2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

[Scottdau]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Hmm another Sharks fan with blinders on. Anybody notice how the fans of teams with no rooting interest in this series like Realm are saying the officiating aided the Sharks? I wonder why that is.

On what planet does a 10-4 in PP's not help a team win a game?

Because he hate the Sharks. And Joe T.

[mgoblue678]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

also you wanna talk about dives or bad penalties? How bout Howard's laughable dive? or how about Heatley getting called for goalie interference after he got pushed on to Howard? The refs called a tight game and the Wings got out worked in the 3rd and lost, deal with it.

You realize Realm isn't even a Wings fan right? You mean the laughable dive where he took a stick to the face that wasn't called on the Sharks like the barely there contact on Nabby's two dives where a penalty was actually called on the Wings. Congratulations you just pointed out one of the instances of the double standards in this game.

[LGO]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

You realize Realm isn't even a Wings fan right? You mean the laughable dive where he took a stick to the face that wasn't called on the Sharks like the barely there contact on Nabby's two dives where a penalty was actually called on the Wings. Congratulations you just pointed out one of the instances of the double standards in this game.

You being mad isn't going to change any of these games, Sharks have won 2, Wings have won 0, deal with it

[mgoblue678]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Of course the penalties helped the Sharks, but their was BS penalties for both sides, the boarding minor on Pat at the end of the first, Heatley's goal tender interference, the bad calls evened out and the Wings played a sloppy period, quit blaming the refs, the Wings gave up 45 shots, blame the lose on that.

You are seriously delusional if you think the bs penalties were even on both sides. There were at least 4 or 5 on the Wings and I counted those 2 on the Sharks. They gave up 45 shots because they were on the penalty kill for 20 minutes of the game. I fail to see how giving up 45 shots on that many PK'S is terrible including a 5 on 3. They easily could have give up more than 45 shots.

Whatever, I am done responding to Sharks fans in this thread who are clearly allowing their blinders to interfere with their logic . Keep claiming 10-4 in PP's is even officiating though. Like I said enjoy the calls the Sharks got in this game and dives they got away with because that sure as hell isn't happening at the Joe.

Of course what would I expect from Sharks fans considering Scott didn't even understand what diving was before I posted the definition from the rulebook.

[LGO]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

'
You are seriously delusional if you think the bs penalties were even on both sides. There were at least 4 or 5 on the Wings and I counted those 2 on the Sharks. They gave up 45 shots because they were on the penalty kill for 20 minutes of the game. I fail to see how giving up 45 shots on that many PK'S is terrible including a 5 on 3. They easily could have give up more than 45 shots.

Whatever, I am done responding to Sharks fans in this thread who are clearly allowing their blinders to interfere with their logic you included. Like I said enjoy the calls the Sharks got in this game and dives they got away with because that sure as hell isn't happening at the Joe.

C'mon blaming the refs makes you sound like a butthurt tin foil wearing NBA fan. the Wings couldn't stop Pavelski and they blew the lead, you lost, it's just a hockey game, why you gotta be so mad?

[Scottdau]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

'
You are seriously delusional if you think the bs penalties were even on both sides. There were at least 4 or 5 on the Wings and I counted those 2 on the Sharks. They gave up 45 shots because they were on the penalty kill for 20 minutes of the game. I fail to see how giving up 45 shots on that many PK'S is terrible including a 5 on 3. They easily could have give up more than 45 shots.

Whatever, I am done responding to Sharks fans in this thread who are clearly allowing their blinders to interfere with their logic you included. Like I said enjoy the calls the Sharks got in this game and dives they got away with because that sure as hell isn't happening at the Joe.

Blinders. Come on now. The same can be said about your blinders. You would stick up for your team too. Give me a break on these blinders crap. The bottom line is I am going to stick up for my team just like you are going to stick up for your team. I have seen you stick up for some of the Wings crap before. But that is natural it is your team. The Sharks will be ready for the next game. They haven't even hit their stride yet. should be a fun series and the Joe will be rocking and so will both Joe's of the Sharks.

[Scottdau]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

You are seriously delusional if you think the bs penalties were even on both sides. There were at least 4 or 5 on the Wings and I counted those 2 on the Sharks. They gave up 45 shots because they were on the penalty kill for 20 minutes of the game. I fail to see how giving up 45 shots on that many PK'S is terrible including a 5 on 3. They easily could have give up more than 45 shots.

Whatever, I am done responding to Sharks fans in this thread who are clearly allowing their blinders to interfere with their logic . Keep claiming 10-4 in PP's is even officiating though. Like I said enjoy the calls the Sharks got in this game and dives they got away with because that sure as hell isn't happening at the Joe.

Of course what would I expect from Sharks fans considering Scott didn't even understand what diving was before I posted the definition from the rulebook.

Wow, nice remark. Oh well I am not going to get in a pissing match with you I am too old for that. We will just agree to disagree bro.

[mgoblue678]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

C'mon blaming the refs makes you sound like a butthurt tin foil wearing NBA fan. the Wings couldn't stop Pavelski and they blew the lead, you lost, it's just a hockey game, why you gotta be so mad?

Hmm maybe because I am a big Wings fans and just saw them get screwed. That may upset a fan of a team slightly. I wonder what Sharks fans would be saying if the situation was reversed, probably the exact same thing.

Don't you find it odd Sharks fans are the only ones defending the officiating?

Like I said, I really don't have any incentive to discuss this with Shark fans any further. I don't most of them even understand the game that well.

[LGO]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Hmm maybe because I am a big Wings fans and just saw them get screwed. That may upset a fan of a team slightly. I wonder what Sharks fans would be saying if the situation was reversed, probably the exact same thing.

Don't you find it odd Sharks fans are the only ones defending the officiating?

Like I said, I really don't have any incentive to discuss this with Shark fans any further. I don't most of them even understand the game that well.

Here's what really matters
Sharks:4
Wings:3

Sharks:2
Wings:0

haters gonna hate

[Scottdau]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Hmm maybe because I am a big Wings fans and just saw them get screwed. That may upset a fan of a team slightly. I wonder what Sharks fans would be saying if the situation was reversed, probably the exact same thing.

Don't you find it odd Sharks fans are the only ones defending the officiating?

Like I said, I really don't have any incentive to discuss this with Shark fans any further. I don't most of them even understand the game that well.

To be honest I wouldn't be complaining about the Refs. I have never complained about the refs in any sports I watch. It is a part of the game. To be honest I wouldn't even be mad if the Sharks lost this round. As long as they play good and gave it all they had that is all I care about. That is why I was not all mad about last year. The Ducks were better and it showed. This year the Sharks are different. They have that come back in them this and that was lacking for so many years.

[pietasterp]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Of course the penalties helped the Sharks, but their was BS penalties for both sides, the boarding minor on Pat at the end of the first, Heatley's goal tender interference, the bad calls evened out and the Wings played a sloppy period, quit blaming the refs, the Wings gave up 45 shots, blame the lose on that.

Right, but the point is that there were not the same NUMBER of BS calls on both sides. Can anyone here honestly justify the 10-4 (really 10-3) Power Play disparity in this game? Okay, bad calls get made both ways, but more than twice as often favoring one team?

I know blaming the refs is the ultimate sore loser thing to do, and I almost never resort to it if my team loses. But this was really egregious - you are forced to mention it if you are talking about the game. There are times, believe it or not, when the refs decide the outcome of a game. Does anyone think Sacramento Kings fans are sore losers for complaining about the refs in the 2002 Western Conference Finals? Whether it was intentional or not, the refs have basically put the Wings on the brink - there's really no way around it. I think the team, the game, and the league deserved better.

[mgoblue678]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Blinders. Come on now. The same can be said about your blinders. You would stick up for your team too. Give me a break on these blinders crap. The bottom line is I am going to stick up for my team just like you are going to stick up for your team. I have seen you stick up for some of the Wings crap before. But that is natural it is your team. The Sharks will be ready for the next game. They haven't even hit their stride yet. should be a fun series and the Joe will be rocking and so will both Joe's of the Sharks.

Really? You want to show/post some examples to prove that point.

And here is where your logic of it's only Wings fans complaining about the officiating is incorrect. Do you not see fans of other teams like Boston and the Wild in this thread saying the same thing that Wings fans are saying? The only ones saying the opposite are Sharks fans.

[Scottdau]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Hmm maybe because I am a big Wings fans and just saw them get screwed. That may upset a fan of a team slightly. I wonder what Sharks fans would be saying if the situation was reversed, probably the exact same thing.

Don't you find it odd Sharks fans are the only ones defending the officiating?

Like I said, I really don't have any incentive to discuss this with Shark fans any further. I don't most of them even understand the game that well.

Wow another nice dig on the Sharks fans. You should hook up with Hank(money99) and write a joke book.

[RealmK]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Hmm another Sharks fan with blinders on. Anybody notice how the fans of teams with no rooting interest in this series like Realm are saying the officiating aided the Sharks? I wonder why that is.

On what planet does a 10-4 in PP's not help a team win a game?

Fosho. I'm a Bruins fan and hell I didn't need the refs to tell me what a dive is to know what I saw all night long, I've watched hockey for enough years to be able to tell with my very own eyes what a dive is or is not. I love the "They called Heatly wrongly for interference once!" somehow means the game was called down the middle.. The logic, or lack their of with some people is nothing short of astounding.

[Scottdau]

Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Really? You want to show/post some examples to prove that point.

And here is where your logic of it's only Wings fans complaining about the officiating is incorrect. Do you not see fans of other teams like Boston and the Wild in this thread saying the same thing that Wings fans are saying? The only ones saying the opposite are Sharks fans.

What ever. I am done. We will just agree to disagree. I swear I have seen you stick up for some bogus plays for the Wings. I am not going to do a search, if you say you never had then I will take your word for it. I am not saying the game was called great at all. But I will never blame the refs for a lost, never. Even if they cause the Sharks to lose game 7. I will never blame the refs.