which band do u guys prefer? and why dont u prefer the other? i wanna know ur thoughts
Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
my 2 best friends are going back and forth with this debate about which band is better. my friend is a hardcore rage fan who refuses to admit audioslave is good and my other friend is obsessed with them...guitar work, lyrics and everything. and we all know about rage
which band do u guys prefer? and why dont u prefer the other? i wanna know ur thoughtsTags: None -
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
Originally posted by zeroxray0my friend ... refuses to admit audioslave is good ...
I kid. Well, kinda.
Of the two, I'd probably go with Audioslave simply because Cornell annoys me much less than Zach did. -
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
Originally posted by BGarrett7Good for him.
I kid. Well, kinda.
Of the two, I'd probably go with Audioslave simply because Cornell annoys me much less than Zach did.Listen to some of my covers:
http://profile.ultimate-guitar.com/chiefillinimac/
Currently:
Asilos Magdalena by The Mars Volta
LOST Theme
The Rain Song by Led Zeppelin
Rage Against the Machine Acoustic Medley
Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
If you could somehow combine RATM's music with Audioslave's lyrics, that would be great. Morello was allowed to freelance a lot more in RATM and as a result they had a much less polished, much more raw sound that I liked more than Audioslave. But Audioslave has a little better written, more melodic songs and their lyrics aren't nearly as polarizing and annoying as Zach's used to be.Helen: Everyone's special, Dash.
Dash: [muttering] Which is another way of saying no one is.Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
I would much rather listen to RATM than Audioslave.Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
I would also much rather listen to RATM (although too political) than Audioslave.Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
Wow, I can't believe this is even a debate. Rage EASY, by a long shot. Audioslave is boring, they are good at what they do, but what they do is make decent radio-rock songs that you don't mind hearing, but never get you excited or make you feel passionate about(they remind me alot of the recent Foo Fighters in this way, a solid vetern act, but obviously lacking something). Rage's debut alone has more interesting songs than Audioslave has released so far.
Cornell is amazing, Soundgarden is classic(Rage vs. Soundgarden is a more interesting debate I think) and his solo album was great. He has a great voice and writes great songs. And the boys from Rage are great musicians, but they are constrained by the new band and Cornell sounds like he is too. The Rage guys are stuck playing less aggressive music for modern rock radio while Cornell is stuck between the straight out agressiveness most of Soundgarden showed and the laid back, nothing-to-lose feeling his solo album had.
Rage wins, Audioslave is a good band, but they never make you think they are a great band. Their songs are as forgettable as most radio-rock music out there today, even if the quality is a little higher.Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
Originally posted by pk500Audioslave. Rage is just noise, as all metal-rap fusion is. Plus Audioslave has the best working vocalist in rock today, Chris Cornell. That guy has pipes.
Take care,
PK
EDIT: How could I forget Maynard????? Even if you hate the guy, he has a KILLER set of pipes.
Also, you will ALL be amazed by J. Loren... vocalist of the new band Hurt, debut due out 3/21.... wait until you guys hear that album, I have had the pleasure...Last edited by eXperiment63; 03-15-2006, 07:35 PM.Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
Originally posted by CM1847Wow, I can't believe this is even a debate. Rage EASY, by a long shot. Audioslave is boring, they are good at what they do, but what they do is make decent radio-rock songs that you don't mind hearing, but never get you excited or make you feel passionate about(they remind me alot of the recent Foo Fighters in this way, a solid vetern act, but obviously lacking something). Rage's debut alone has more interesting songs than Audioslave has released so far.
Cornell is amazing, Soundgarden is classic(Rage vs. Soundgarden is a more interesting debate I think) and his solo album was great. He has a great voice and writes great songs. And the boys from Rage are great musicians, but they are constrained by the new band and Cornell sounds like he is too. The Rage guys are stuck playing less aggressive music for modern rock radio while Cornell is stuck between the straight out agressiveness most of Soundgarden showed and the laid back, nothing-to-lose feeling his solo album had.
Rage wins, Audioslave is a good band, but they never make you think they are a great band. Their songs are as forgettable as most radio-rock music out there today, even if the quality is a little higher.
I kind of feel sorry for the ex-Rage members...they went from Total energy to totally boring.Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
Originally posted by pk500Audioslave. Rage is just noise, as all metal-rap fusion is. Plus Audioslave has the best working vocalist in rock today, Chris Cornell. That guy has pipes.
Take care,
PK
Anyway, back to the original topic - Rage Against the Machine hands down. There's really nothing special about the rhythm section, but I thought Brad and Tim were better in RATM with the hip hop element than they are with Audioslave. In Audioslave, since its a rock band, they have the chance to venture out and expand, but I haven't heard any attempts to explore or just let loose.
Tom Morello, like Cornell's vocals, is a shadow of his former self. In RATM, he had much more room to work with and a lot more freedom. Of course he's trying new styles and sounds with Audioslave, but he's restricted to half-*** solos which are not provoking and become dull after a handful of listens.
Then of course Audioslave's whole song structure has me on edge. Verse. Chorus. Verse. Solo. Verse. Chorus. And it never really strays far from that pattern. Their whole sound seems too formulaic, uninspired, and rather cliche IMO. Audioslave is a good radio band, but outside of their singles, they have few songs to offer which are as good/better than their singles.
The lyrics are pretty much a toss up. I find RATM's lyrics more intellectual, more provoking and more passionate than Audioslave's.
So, my vote goes to Rage Against The Machine.
Comment
-
Re: Want your opinion: rage against the machine or audioslave?
As was stated above, I can't believe this is even a real debate, RATM is worlds better than Audioslave. As for RATM's politics and lyrics, I am one of the most conservative people politcally out there (witness my avatar) but good music is still good music, I don't have to agree with all of RATM's lyrics to enjoy listening to it and no one else should let that stop them either.Streaming PC & PS5 games, join me most nights after 6:00pm ET on TwitchTV https://www.twitch.tv/shaunh20
or Tiktok https://www.tiktok.com/@shaunh741
My YouTube Vids: https://www.youtube.com/@OdoggyDogg/videosComment
Comment