I refrained from talking to anybody about this after the film because I knew I wouldn't be able to on OS. I didn't want to even begin the discussion in my mind.
I didn't really feel like the film was too long. I did, however, feel that the excruciating exposition in the beginning of the film was way too long. So, maybe the film could have been shorter if the beginning was cut tighter.
And so people don't think I'm just down on the film, I will say that the actions sequences were nice and very well done. The CGI of the natives was impressive. The color palette in relation to real shots seemed a bit off in my mind, but I still haven't decided if that was done on purpose to show us the difference in "worlds" and people or if it's just my mind trying to tell me that it's CGI and not accepting the life-like capturing.
I'll admit that I was under the impression that the 3D would blow my mind away. I kept hearing/reading things like "you feel immersed" and I guess I expected something different. It honestly felt like another 3D movie to me. Was it a well-done 3D movie? Oh yea. It's not anything like the cheesy stuff from when I was a kid. But, I don't see the difference between this new camera and the regular IMAX 3D camera. As I said, Alice in Wonderland looked more impressive and even the Space Documentary using IMAX 3D was just as impressive.


Comment