The Walking Dead

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kanobi
    H*F Cl*ss *f '09
    • Apr 2003
    • 6052

    #346
    Re: The Walking Dead

    Last edited by Beantown; 12-03-2010 at 08:01 AM. Reason: Added the NSFW Spoiler tag around the video due to the tiiiiiiiitties
    .....

    Comment

    • Kanobi
      H*F Cl*ss *f '09
      • Apr 2003
      • 6052

      #347
      Re: The Walking Dead

      Originally posted by dossier
      im sorry but that sucked soo bad. I can't believe any one thought of making that in the first place
      Aw c'mon man!! It's a zombie fighting a shark!!! Find a cooler concept than that, I dare ya!!!

      Comment

      • CaptainZombie
        Brains
        • Jul 2003
        • 37851

        #348
        Re: The Walking Dead

        Originally posted by Kanobi
        BTW - greatest scene from a zombie flick ever....

        Spoiler
        Originally posted by Kanobi
        Aw c'mon man!! It's a zombie fighting a shark!!! Find a cooler concept than that, I dare ya!!!
        That was one of the best scenes in a zombie film and Zombi 2 was a good film.
        HDMovie Room

        Comment

        • jeremym480
          Speak it into existence
          • Oct 2008
          • 18198

          #349
          Re: The Walking Dead

          Zombies, sharks and boobies thats a lethal yet, great combination, IMO.

          My 2K17 Boston Celtics MyLeague

          Alabama Crimson Tide
          Green Bay Packers
          Boston Celtics

          New Orleans Pelicans

          Comment

          • bigfnjoe96
            Hall Of Fame
            • Feb 2004
            • 11410

            #350
            Re: The Walking Dead

            Originally posted by CaptainZombie
            That was one of the best scenes in a zombie film and Zombi 2 was a good film.
            Fulci is Italian horror @ it's finest. Both movies are classics.

            Comment

            • TheCreep
              Banned
              • Nov 2008
              • 1792

              #351
              Re: The Walking Dead

              Why do some still consider the raging humans in the 28 days films zombies? They're most definitely not.

              Comment

              • Fresh Tendrils
                Strike Hard and Fade Away
                • Jul 2002
                • 36131

                #352
                Originally posted by TheCreep
                Why do some still consider the raging humans in the 28 days films zombies? They're most definitely not.
                Because everything else is similar to other great zombie flicks?

                Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk



                Comment

                • dossier
                  Banned
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 2272

                  #353
                  Re: The Walking Dead

                  the only real difference between them is that one's pissed off and runs really fast

                  Comment

                  • jeremym480
                    Speak it into existence
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 18198

                    #354
                    Re: The Walking Dead

                    I agree that I like the slow walking zombies better on the Walking Dead. However, if in real life I would much rather face those walkers than those infected with rage.
                    My 2K17 Boston Celtics MyLeague

                    Alabama Crimson Tide
                    Green Bay Packers
                    Boston Celtics

                    New Orleans Pelicans

                    Comment

                    • gschwendt
                      EA Game Changer
                      • May 2003
                      • 1044

                      #355
                      Re: The Walking Dead

                      That and I consider someone being infected with "rage" more likely in the real world than someone rising from the dead.

                      Comment

                      • DaveDQ
                        13
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 7664

                        #356
                        Re: The Walking Dead

                        About Merle....

                        He was/is way too out of control to the group. I think he proved that when he got cuffed to the top of the building. They went back for him and couldn't get to him. I don't have a problem with them not leaving him a specific note to avoid the camp. I also think his brother, while didn't verbally mention much about Merle, was visibly upset with what they were doing. he's still very upset for Merle and what happened.

                        To me the latest episode was my favorite. It showed me they can keep this story moving. I haven't enjoyed a TV show like this since The Black Donnely's. It's good to know this one will continue next season.
                        Being kind, one to another, never disappoints.

                        Comment

                        • TheCreep
                          Banned
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 1792

                          #357
                          Re: The Walking Dead

                          Originally posted by dossier
                          the only real difference between them is that one's pissed off and runs really fast
                          Nah, the major difference between them is one is dead the other is not. I can see where people would think they're the same though.

                          Comment

                          • Brandwin
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 30621

                            #358
                            Yeah. 28 Days has infected living people.

                            Comment

                            • dossier
                              Banned
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 2272

                              #359
                              Re: The Walking Dead

                              Originally posted by TheCreep
                              Nah, the major difference between them is one is dead the other is not. I can see where people would think they're the same though.
                              o come on, like that detail really matters. I mean you're right, it is a big difference, but that's not the main difference. One can run while being pissed off while the other can walk....

                              Comment

                              • CaptainZombie
                                Brains
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 37851

                                #360
                                Re: The Walking Dead

                                Originally posted by Kanobi
                                I don't consider 28 Days as zombies. They weren't dead or reanimated. Just living humans infected with 'Rage'. So they're track-like, adrenaline fused speed is excusable. but I agree with you on the 'Dawn of the Dead' remake. Rigor mortis makes that type of movement impossible.. I'm also with you in terms of your preference for the slow-moving zombies.
                                I kind of disagree with you here. We learn that the infection spreads via Rage from the monkeys/chimps. Once someone is bitten, they become infected almost like a zombie with Rage. I guess I can also understand where you are coming from with your point of view.

                                Originally posted by Brandon
                                Yeah. 28 Days has infected living people.
                                That is my point too.
                                HDMovie Room

                                Comment

                                Working...