This was said by someone on reddit. Sounds like he knows what he's talking about. But of course you never know.
So, that said, math itself cannot be patented ... period. Only a specific implementation of it qualifies as an invention even in the US. Since it's extremely unlikely Sean used their exact engine which is actually patented, this is all just a bunch of bull**** to garner some PR and a possible "go the f--- away" payday.
US citation: "In addition to the terms "laws of nature," "natural phenomena," and "abstract ideas," judicially recognized exceptions have been described using various other terms, including "physical phenomena," "scientific principles," "systems that depend on human intelligence alone," "disembodied concepts," "mental processes" and "disembodied mathematical algorithms and formulas," for example."
EU citation:"(2) The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1: (a) discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods;"
So even while in the US, recent SCOTUS decisions have clarified this, in the EU it is enshrined in absolute terms in the statute itself that mathematical methods, whether they be complex or not, do not qualify for patent protection.
What does this mean for the game? Hopefully Sean sticks with the NewEgg model of patent troll defense: fight to the end and never settle. This has proven extremely effective for them and considering the apparent strength of their defense against this spurious accusation, it seems the proper course.
I, for one, have sent an email already offering my financial support (separate from my pre-purchase of three copies for myself and my kids), such as it is, for any fight against this garbage. I urge everyone else to likewise stand up, metaphorically speaking, against a bunch of goons who simply want a quick payday on the back of a successful young game company.
Edited to complete a sentence I left incomplete. Funny thing is I am on pain meds now and wasn't then. Go figure ...
Comment