Big Three changes need to start at the top

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BrianFifaFan
    Semi-retired
    • Oct 2003
    • 4137

    #61
    Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

    I normally try to stay out of such heated deals as they tend to go south in a hurry. But, alas, I'm in fact a Union Worker at DMAX Ltd. that makes engines for GM. I make a little over $18 an hour after 8 years. I worked 66 hours a week in various capacities for over 6 years and it was hardly about entitlement. It was about hard work and long hours. As I gained seniority and was viewed as having potential I was selected for Team Leader and that brought even longer hours and more responsibility for a whole extra .75 an hour. Our company grew in leaps and bounds by the efforts of persons like myself. There are roughly 200 of the "old school" "life-time deal" types in my plant. And the simple truth is that there are less and less.

    Now what the critics on here don't understand is that since 95 the deals have gotten less and less sweet. The worker of today is living in the new reality, we're day workers. Generous Motors is gone. And we don't complain. You guys really need to get away from the stereotypes. First of all, many persons, like myself, have either college degrees or some college. We're not, as I like to put it, "Monkeys with a Wrench." Most of our local Union Leaders are also availing themselves of College Tutition Reimbursment programs the company makes available. And they are sent to college courses to learn their trade as a Labor Rep. My company doesn't hire anyone who doesn't have at least a High School Diploma or GED.

    Why is this relevant? Because the prevailing stereotype is that we are dumb, fat and lazy. Most of us feel blessed to have these type of jobs. Our shop really isn't the old nepotistic union shop of days gone by. And while we have our problems with the International Union at times, widespread corruption is another grossly exaggerated stereotype, normally perpetuated by persons who heard stories from others and never worked a day in their life in said factories. Is it the best job? Could we do more with our lives? That's open to conjecture. But here's the rub... I'm proud of being a factory worker and find my experience to have been deeply meaningful. So please don't demean me or some of my fellow union brothers and sisters.

    Now you want to know what's really wrong? Legacy costs are crippling. We have a smaller work force that is trying to prop up the larger number of retirees that have lifetime benefits. We have health care costs that have skyrocketed from the time those contracts were made in good faith by BOTH parties. The UAW is in the process of trying to modify these crippling situations in conjunction with the Big Three. We have poor management that has hidden the profit train for too long building SUV's until the market collapsed underneath them. They sold forever and all three built them like they were going out of style with no thought for the future. Now this is what burns my britches. I don't design, market or sell anything. I just build it and try to do it well. Rick and the other two make the Big Boy decisions and I might add get paid quite handsomely for their troubles. And then they get paid when they blow it, too. But then I read how it's our fault. Please! All I'm hearing is Eliteism and Social Darwinism. And persons spewing tired stereotypes.

    Now whether you agree or not with the bailout, cool. But this is the truth. We outsource more and more work everyday in the name of profit. We deal in intangibles as our new frontier of job creation. Service sector jobs. Or Information Tech or even something as hot as the Nursing field is right now. We have Wright State that pumps out Doctors at a ridiculous rate. Who do you think uses all of those things? The very working class that is quickly becoming expendable. I'll be the first to agree that in my situations a lot of very critical, long overdue decisions have to made rightly and quickly. But the importance of action being taken to help stop the failure of the single largest remaining manufacturing sector we have left domestically is not to be taken lightly. And not to be fodder for armchair QB's who really, in truth, pay a miniscule amount of money per person.

    I'm not really trying to sound "preachy" or like a jerk. And I'd like to send out some Fraternal Love to Dave374. Ironic,huh? But at the end of the day, I'd just ask that some guys on here would keep from bashing the Union Worker in generalities and tired sterotypes. I'm one and I can assure you I work for my money and am proud of what I do to support my family. You might not think highly of my line of worker and my union, but I'll leave you with this. Be it reporter, steelworker, factory worker or Pro Athlete, Unions have done more good than not. Just like the crooks that hung out in the big finanical houses, we have our own bad apples too. There are lazy persons in everywhere from the Assembly Line to the Boardroom. Eventually they don't make it. And here's my proof. My company has fired both Union and Management who broke the rules. We have made over a Million Duramax engines in 8 years. So obviously we weren't all sitting around doing nothing for all that time.

    Could better decisions have been made and a better, more efficient (profitable) processes and habits been adopted by both parties? You bet'cha. But please don't cast stones blindly at persons that you only know in movies and stereotypes. The fact is my employer is seeking help.Hopefully, from my perspective, it'll come. And hopefully it won't just be wasted, but the start of a new age where the Company and Union together can forge out a smart plan to help American workers reclaim the legacy of when they helped build the Middle Class. If they can't get it done, it'll be a sad day for America. Sad truth is America is really losing it's edge as an innovator and creator. Hopefully the Big Three will get that spirit back after this wake up call and invent the future of transportation when their bruised egos heal. Not Japan, China or India.....

    P.S. Dave374, I liked everything you said. It was almost "God-like." That was a joke. BTW, no hard feelings about the other stuff. It's water under the bridge with me. But I'll have to correct you about one thing. I didn't get beat up much.
    Last edited by BrianFifaFan; 11-21-2008, 08:16 PM.
    Note to Tiburon Marketing:

    A great product sells itself, no "back of the box" features required! (See Fifa...)

    Comment

    • BrianFifaFan
      Semi-retired
      • Oct 2003
      • 4137

      #62
      Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

      Glad you put that up. That gets thrown in the Unions face all the time, especially during the American Axle stuff. Truth is that GM and Dick Dauch used that without explaining how much of that is actually Legacy costs. Over half. Now do you renig on deals made? What we really need to chart out is how even ten years ago the deals were doable. Let's talk Health Care costs. I could give you guys all kinds of great data on that. I know exactly how much that costs for each person on our payroll. And we've tried hard to control it. But hey, if the market will bear it... How about we try to fight where the benefits can be paid and either the company or the UAW can continue to afford it? Not I've gotta move offshore to be able to make money or you take massive cuts and not be able to afford the house that you bought in good faith through the sweat of you brow doing some pretty hard work. Isn't that the American Way? Work hard, find your American Dream? Oh now it's you're doing work that has become far less valuable than it was when you sarted down the path.

      I'm not directing any of this at you. I'm really glad you posted that. It just makes me seeth at how this country has become so Darwinistic and so appologetic in the name of "Free Market Principles." They did that at the beginning of the 20th Century in the days of the Tycoons. Sweatshops and all. That's how my kind (Unions) came into being. Maybe we need this all to happen again. I'm feeling pretty good that public sentiment is headed in my direction.
      Note to Tiburon Marketing:

      A great product sells itself, no "back of the box" features required! (See Fifa...)

      Comment

      • fistofrage
        Hall Of Fame
        • Aug 2002
        • 13682

        #63
        Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

        Originally posted by BrianFifaFan
        Glad you put that up. That gets thrown in the Unions face all the time, especially during the American Axle stuff. Truth is that GM and Dick Dauch used that without explaining how much of that is actually Legacy costs. Over half. Now do you renig on deals made? What we really need to chart out is how even ten years ago the deals were doable. Let's talk Health Care costs. I could give you guys all kinds of great data on that. I know exactly how much that costs for each person on our payroll. And we've tried hard to control it. But hey, if the market will bear it... How about we try to fight where the benefits can be paid and either the company or the UAW can continue to afford it? Not I've gotta move offshore to be able to make money or you take massive cuts and not be able to afford the house that you bought in good faith through the sweat of you brow doing some pretty hard work. Isn't that the American Way? Work hard, find your American Dream? Oh now it's you're doing work that has become far less valuable than it was when you sarted down the path.

        I'm not directing any of this at you. I'm really glad you posted that. It just makes me seeth at how this country has become so Darwinistic and so appologetic in the name of "Free Market Principles." They did that at the beginning of the 20th Century in the days of the Tycoons. Sweatshops and all. That's how my kind (Unions) came into being. Maybe we need this all to happen again. I'm feeling pretty good that public sentiment is headed in my direction.
        Thats what I've been saying. Bad business decisions have led the big 3 to where they are. I know the deals have gotten less sweet, but fact of the matter is that this bailout money is needed because people were over paid, retirees packages were too lucrative, and both the union and upper management were greedy and wanted money in their pockets today, damn the future.

        But it still boils down to the fact that these business were ill run by nearly everyone involved and they need to be let to fail if they are going to fail, just like small business X will be left to fail if they overpay their workers both at the top and the bottom and make numerous other terrible business decisions along the way.
        Chalepa Ta Kala.....

        Comment

        • dave374
          Banned
          • Feb 2003
          • 1928

          #64
          Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

          What I find funny about this entire situation is how fast Paulson and his boys were willing to bail out banks (who were borderline criminal for how they dealt with the subprime fiasco), yet are aghast at helping three companies, because they've made some bad (but not illegal or immoral) decisions in the past.

          Brianfifafan made real world comments about unions ... something many have no clue about. Unless you've been in a union, been a manager whose dealt with a union directly, been a part of a labour deal, etc... I doubt you have a deep enough knowledge to bash or support the trade union movement.
          Some people bash unions based entirely on third-hand knowledge.

          As a unit chairman for my local, I saw first-hand the give and take where union/management are concerned. I also took part in a week of contract negotiations.

          Trust me, not all union workers make $25 an hour, have in-ground pools and six weeks of vacation.

          In 17 years at my job, I've had two sick days ... hardly the stuff of union legend.
          Last edited by dave374; 11-21-2008, 09:23 PM.

          Comment

          • Cebby
            Banned
            • Apr 2005
            • 22327

            #65
            Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

            Originally posted by BrianFifaFan
            Glad you put that up. That gets thrown in the Unions face all the time, especially during the American Axle stuff. Truth is that GM and Dick Dauch used that without explaining how much of that is actually Legacy costs. Over half.
            Everyone knows that the majority of those figures are for pensions and healthcare. But passing the buck like that doesn't work, since the current people will be receiving the healthcare and pensions. If not for paying for the old folks, you'd be getting more money now.

            Now do you renig on deals made?
            Given that everyone on the pension plan will essentially be the old white man version of welfare queens, yes you do.

            Oh now it's you're doing work that has become far less valuable than it was when you sarted down the path.
            That's always been the American way. That's pretty much the basis of capitalism. The lowest skill level and easiest to fill jobs will be paid the least and the workers will be most expendable. UAW's problem was making those jobs worth mid level money, while not being that valuable.

            That's how my kind (Unions) came into being.
            And then you took a bit too much ground and priced yourself right out of the picture.

            I'm feeling pretty good that public sentiment is headed in my direction.
            Outside of Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and Minnesota, there isn't a ton of support for the auto bailout. It'll get passed next session, but only because of UAW's PAC contributions.

            Comment

            • Knight165
              *ll St*r
              • Feb 2003
              • 24964

              #66
              Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

              Originally posted by yamabushi


              I dont have the exact Barney Frank quote from the other day but he basically said a bail-out for the '3' is really a bail-out for the Unions.
              Would this be the same Barney Frank(and some others who are "just like him":wink that continually and REPEATEDLY said that "nothing is wrong"...."you're trying to reign in the subprime lending because of XXXX(can't bring it up on O.S.) everytime someone in Congress tried to put forth that we needed more regulation in the lending markets?
              I'm gonna listen to THAT jerk-off?....NO THANK YOU.

              People....I'm not for the bailout, but if you don't see that losing even ONE of those companies would be a DISASTER on the workforce....you're blind.
              ....and according to Car and Driver GM has 3 of the top ten cars for 2008. MORE than any other company on the list

              10Best Cars

              Price cap: $72,000

              It should be noted that Car and Driver considers the Porsche Boxster and Cayman to be the same car.
              Model Times on List
              BMW 3-Series 17
              Cadillac CTS 1
              Chevrolet Corvette 14
              Chevrolet Malibu 1
              Honda Accord 22
              Honda Fit 2
              Mazda MX-5 9
              Mazdaspeed3 2
              Porsche Boxster 9
              Porsche Cayman 2
              Volkswagen GTI 5

              .....but I'm sure thanks to some stigma(maybe deservedly somewhat)....people will avoid any upward movement from these American companies for quite some time.

              The idea of "free trade" is B.S.
              No other nation imports the goods that the U.S. does and nowhere else allows such free access to foreign companies selling goods as the U.S., and now we are paying the price for that.
              Sure GM and the others decided to go status quo(not as far back ans the 40's though as someone alluded to) and that was a big contributor....but so has the ONE WAY "free trade".
              We're moving into some dangerous territory as far as O.S. TOS...so I'll leave it lay, but the whole "American car companies suck...the foreign companies do it better" chant is not as nearly true as people believe. The hype is WAY past the truth, but most just won't hear it....
              They(the Big 3) have a long hill to climb, mostly to do with themselves...partly because of some bad press.....partly because of some bad hype now......let's hope they can make it. The alternative WILL NOT be pretty for the economy.

              M.K.
              Knight165

              M.K.
              Knight165
              All gave some. Some gave all. 343

              Comment

              • The C
                Banned
                • Apr 2005
                • 7538

                #67
                Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                Comment

                • Cebby
                  Banned
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 22327

                  #68
                  Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                  Originally posted by Knight165
                  I'm gonna listen to THAT jerk-off?....NO THANK YOU.
                  Barney is for the bailout.

                  The idea of "free trade" is B.S.
                  Free trade has allowed us to exploit other countries at a level not attained since the colonization of the Americas.

                  Comment

                  • Knight165
                    *ll St*r
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 24964

                    #69
                    Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                    Originally posted by Cebby
                    Barney is for the bailout.



                    Free trade has allowed us to exploit other countries at a level not attained since the colonization of the Americas.

                    1. Frank may be for it...but as I stated.....I AM NOT for the bailout, so I'm not sure why you made this statement.

                    2.When you say "us" who do you mean? Companies? Your mom, my pop, his sister? Macy's? Sears? Martha?
                    If I'm understanding what you are getting at....sure....there was exploitation.....but I'm not sure what me saying "free trade is B.S." has to do with it. It's basically reinforcing what I'm saying. The "free trade" was a ONE WAY STREET and yes companies took advantage of workers as much as the governments of those countries let them by barring unions and decent working conditions and wages.
                    Yes...it's much more complicated than just that....but please....the whole "America is the bad guy" mantra is getting a bit stale. A LOT of people and a lot of countries have reaped in the exploitation.
                    But you guys are right let's get rid of unions......
                    Sure unions have gotten a little too strong in some cases...but it has a way of correcting itself as the market goes one way or another. A lot of unions are going to have to make some HUGE concessions in the very near future.

                    M.K.
                    Knight165
                    All gave some. Some gave all. 343

                    Comment

                    • Cebby
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2005
                      • 22327

                      #70
                      Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                      Originally posted by Knight165
                      2.When you say "us" who do you mean? Companies? Your mom, my pop, his sister? Macy's? Sears? Martha?
                      The state of America.

                      If I'm understanding what you are getting at....sure....there was exploitation.....but I'm not sure what me saying "free trade is B.S." has to do with it. It's basically reinforcing what I'm saying.
                      Free trade is not BS. The only people who lose with free trade are the unskilled workers of developed states.

                      Yes...it's much more complicated than just that....but please....the whole "America is the bad guy" mantra is getting a bit stale. A LOT of people and a lot of countries have reaped in the exploitation.
                      I'm not Lenin; I think exploitation is a pretty good thing.

                      but it has a way of correcting itself as the market goes one way or another.
                      And the market has corrected itself.

                      Union auto companies are crying for bailouts. Non-union auto companies are not.

                      Comment

                      • BrianFifaFan
                        Semi-retired
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 4137

                        #71
                        Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                        Originally posted by Cebby
                        Everyone knows that the majority of those figures are for pensions and healthcare. But passing the buck like that doesn't work, since the current people will be receiving the healthcare and pensions. If not for paying for the old folks, you'd be getting more money now.

                        Given that everyone on the pension plan will essentially be the old white man version of welfare queens, yes you do.

                        That's always been the American way. That's pretty much the basis of capitalism. The lowest skill level and easiest to fill jobs will be paid the least and the workers will be most expendable. UAW's problem was making those jobs worth mid level money, while not being that valuable.

                        And then you took a bit too much ground and priced yourself right out of the picture.

                        Outside of Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and Minnesota, there isn't a ton of support for the auto bailout. It'll get passed next session, but only because of UAW's PAC contributions.

                        To conjecture back and forth with you would be arguing with a brick wall. But here's a few statements where you seem to not want to read the truth and listen to too much Fox News. They haven't made any of those "golden" contracts since the mid 90's around GM with the lifetime benefits. They brought out the Living Agreement then and started the 3rd Tier. The persons up to that point got the classic GM deal. At the time there was a funding plan for all of it. A lot of that was tied to sales projections. Funny thing happened on the way to the Forum. They started losing marketshare. To whom? Foreign competitors. Not on price as much as bad planning and a stubborn refusal to be forward thinking and progressive, not willing to assume risk in setting the market and grasping opportunites, but putting out the same tired old stuff. Prius, anyone?

                        In all fairness they did decide to dominate the Truck and SUV market as opposed to the small car market at which the foreign competitors were clearly superior. But they had no plan B for if and when the market dried up. Now the Volt is full speed ahead.... Kinda late to the party. But now the Suits are finally willing to take that risk. God, I wish I was as smart and daring as them. Thomas Edison and Henry Ford would be so proud! Capitalism isn't what we do here. Trust me, look it up. We practice the PT Barnum philosophy. But like I said earlier, The Moneyloving types are about to have a rude awakening. Problem is more and more folk everyday, including Union and non-Union both, are getting the feeling that they've been used to fund huge CEO salaries and bad investments by those who sold themselves as trustworthy and wise. All they did was make a lot of folk believe in stuff that was fantasy. And "don't look at the man behind the curtain" ain't gonna cut it anymore. That why CEO's are getting bashed so hard on the Hill. It's popular and plays real well in Peoria. That's gonna be the new reality. So bash the Union folks all you want. We'll be here when all of the fake wealth is gone ( I mean Market-corrected) and when we're ready to make something that's real. We'll do what our forefathers did, we'll roll up our sleeves and build it. Not strain our brains and believe that somehow that makes us worth planeloads of money. The overly arrogant and prideful will always come to their fall.

                        Oh and as to pricing ourselves out of jobs? The South is just enjoying a little while until the cost of living catches up. Funny thing is, us factory types don't really get ahead. All the smarter folks figure out how to take that little money we've somehow managed to earn. Prices on everything go up after a while. Then you'll need that 18 dollars an hour to keep up your standard of living. And then Toyota is mad and wants to close up shop, just like GM. How about helping keep it where we can keep things the same or maybe just a little better than OK? That's all I want. But we're back at attacking the heart of Capitalism. I guess I just need to become more assertive and not do things to try and make the world a better place, but to make a bunch of money! God would be so proud!
                        Note to Tiburon Marketing:

                        A great product sells itself, no "back of the box" features required! (See Fifa...)

                        Comment

                        • Knight165
                          *ll St*r
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 24964

                          #72
                          Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                          Originally posted by Cebby
                          The state of America.



                          Free trade is not BS. The only people who lose with free trade are the unskilled workers of developed states.



                          I'm not Lenin; I think exploitation is a pretty good thing.



                          And the market has corrected itself.

                          Union auto companies are crying for bailouts. Non-union auto companies are not.

                          1. That's a pretty blanket statement.....that's why I asked you to be a bit more specific. I don't remember getting an "exploitation of other countries labor force check" in the mail....and no...getting a cheap sweater or cheaper electronics does not count.

                          2. Once again....not reading(or I'm not being clear enough)....I'M not saying that free trade is B.S.
                          I'm saying that what people CALL free trade is B.S. WE(the United States) are the consumers....the world lives off our free trade.
                          I'm not blaming anyone in particular for this....but like I stated, it's not really "free trade"(and what I'm really getting at is I would like to see much more taxes on companies that ship goods here...)

                          3. Not sure if you're kidding....doesn't really matter.

                          4. Not quite. There are quite a few shipping yards piling up with Toyota, Honda and the like vehicles. The adjustment is just starting......and if you are seriously trying to lay blame on just the unions for all of this....then I just don't know what else to say. Your "non-union" companies will be crying the blues soon also if 1,000,000 + MORE Americans are looking for work....looking for new towns to live in(the ripple effect of one of the big 3 closing will be devastating) and wondering where their next meal will be for the kids.
                          They won't be looking to buy a Toyota or Hundai anytime soon.
                          ....and like I showed you in the C&D report...it doesn't seem to matter that GM is building better cars....people just keep boosting the hype that they are total crap.

                          M.K.
                          Knight165
                          All gave some. Some gave all. 343

                          Comment

                          • BrianFifaFan
                            Semi-retired
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 4137

                            #73
                            Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                            Oh yeah, one other epiphany before I stop dwelling on this. Funny thing, GM became the nation's largest employer while it was a union company. And was so big that they said that when Gm has a sniffle, the Economy gets a cold. Maybe they were able to do it in spite of the Evil Unions best efforts to undermine them. Read up on the history of Unions in America, not just listen to the Propoganda of the Business Class.... But we'll see if the Employee Free Choice Act gets passed. Then we'll see how people really feel about Unions. I have a feeling our numbers will swell again. Now I just pray that we don't screw it up again.

                            BTW Knight, do you know why Mexico is such a favorite place for plants to be built? You can't have Unions, it's against the law. Sad thing is that WalMart had to allow Unions in China. It's the law in their country. Go figure, the most repressive country in the world has unions.....
                            Note to Tiburon Marketing:

                            A great product sells itself, no "back of the box" features required! (See Fifa...)

                            Comment

                            • Cebby
                              Banned
                              • Apr 2005
                              • 22327

                              #74
                              Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                              Originally posted by Knight165
                              1. That's a pretty blanket statement.....that's why I asked you to be a bit more specific. I don't remember getting an "exploitation of other countries labor force check" in the mail....and no...getting a cheap sweater or cheaper electronics does not count.
                              It does count. MNCs don't exist because they want to help the community. They outsource to Mexico and Pacific rim countries for fun; they do it because they can avoid unions and get cheap labor.

                              and what I'm really getting at is I would like to see much more taxes on companies that ship goods here...
                              Those would be tariffs. That's the exact opposite of free trade.

                              looking for new towns to live in(the ripple effect of one of the big 3 closing will be devastating
                              And they'll be finding those towns in Alabama, Tennessee, and Mississippi. Not quite as bombed out as the mid west and just as broke, but the people are a lot nicer.

                              it doesn't seem to matter that GM is building better cars....people just keep boosting the hype that they are total crap.
                              Sales aren't GM's problem. They sell more cars than any company in the world.

                              Funny thing, GM became the nation's largest employer while it was a union company.
                              And Wal-Mart IS the largest employer and the biggest fighter of unions in the world.

                              But we'll see if the Employee Free Choice Act gets passed.
                              Looking at Union PACs and the ruling party in congress in the 111th, it's pretty obvious that it will.

                              Then we'll see how people really feel about Unions
                              No we won't. The EFCA is pretty much the exact opposite of what it says it is. Unless you like employee intimidation.

                              Go figure, the most repressive country in the world has unions.....
                              All communist/socialist states have unions. They're pretty much based off unions. Granted, China isn't commie anymore, but they won't admit it yet.

                              And China isn't the most repressive country in the world.

                              Comment

                              • dave374
                                Banned
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 1928

                                #75
                                Re: Big Three changes need to start at the top

                                Originally posted by Cebby
                                And Wal-Mart IS the largest employer and the biggest fighter of unions in the world.
                                That's certainly worked out for their employees .... errr associates.

                                Comment

                                Working...