Why hang when dunking two handed? Because I always thought it looked awesome when Chuck Barkley would do it and in fact, if feels awesome. I also used to watch that famous lob to Kemp against the Warriors in the playoffs, where he dunked, hung, and swung into the baseline camera. I always thought that was so legit. Maybe I'm just easily amused, but it's tough to beat a vicious throw down and wild swing. I suppose at its core it's a style thing. If I cared nothing of style and doing things that felt neat, I'd probably never try to dunk in the first place.
Nathan says he does it for safety, but I'm the complete opposite. I'm only two-hand, one-foot dunking with a hang if I know there's no one behind me because I know all it takes is one small nudge and we have an Andrew Bogut situation on our hands (I'll refrain from posting that clip here).
To me, there's just something inherently more awesome about the right amount of hang on a two-hand, one-footer. There's more authority, more power, and one can bask in the awesomeness for a moment. I find quick, two-hand, no-hang dunks to be anti-climatic. Richard Hamilton specialized in the two-hand zero hangs. I respected it, because a bucket's a bucket, but it wasn't as fun as the alternative.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UWldMhxzvdM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JLyJx062bUs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I feel in both instances, had the dunks been mere throw downs with no grabbing or hanging of the rim, they wouldn't have been nearly as awesome or memorable (and probably not as fun for the players performing the acts).
Comment