Instead of saying what I want here and violate the TOS, I'll just leave it as don't be condescending. Being an engineer, by profession, training, and at heart, I did my homework here.
The beer in the can isn't going to get hot enough to inject steam into anything. In fact, if you get the beer hot enough to produce steam your bird is charcoal. Contents of the can get to just under 180 by the end of cook time, no matter what cooking temperature I tried, and that's not hot enough to do anything but very slightly raise evaporation point, and you aren't going to leave the bird on for any amount of time to lead to any sort of meaningful evaporation.
You would add more flavor simply by marinating the chicken in beer beforehand. When I did my beer can bird experiments, we used absolutely bare chickens and even went as far as to replace the beer in the can with the most flavorful liquids we could find. Lighter liquids yielded no difference, more flavorful liquids gave a slight hint (and half of those in attendance couldn't even taste that). Simply dipping the birds in their respective liquids before roasting would have given a much more flavorful result.
Moisture I will chock up to placebo. I've done chickens on cans before and it was not any more moist, in fact the outer appendages (legs, wings) were always drier.
Every bird I tried canned took longer, about 20% longer IIRC. Reason being, water is an insulator. Basically you are taking about 30% of the surface area of the bird and exposing it to lower temperatures. That's also 30% of the surface that isn't going to absorb smoke (if using), nor is it going to brown at all (which isn't good).
See above, no steam without boiling.
Having the chicken vertical makes a positive difference, just don't shove a can full of beer up there and take all the negatives, buy a wire rack or just sit the bird up.
Want beer flavor in a chicken? Use it as part of a brine/marinade/injection, it will waste a lot less beer.
So I reiterate, beer can chicken is a waste of beer.
Comment