So who do we believe when it comes to the GameChanger program?

[ForUntoOblivionSoar∞]

Quote: Originally Posted by GiantBlue76

Chris, I agree with you here. I do not feel EA is a terrible company like most do here. I buy some games published by EA that are outstanding games. I feel the majority of weakness is at Tiburon. That doesn't mean ALL of EA's studios follow this pattern. Tiburon struggles with football and basketball and it seems that no matter how much time or whatever excuse of the week it is can rectify it. I also agree with you 100% about the "gamechangers" program. It's worthless, and we all know what it's really about.

The problem with Tiburon, I suspect, is that they are gamers first and NFL fans second (look at their online job application: being a gamer is a requirement, being an NFL fan, not so much).

If it were FOOTBALL PEOPLE leading, we'd get something great (remember that game from 2004-05 of which we may not speak?). But it's VIDEO GAME PEOPLE leading, or rather, video game people chained by dollar people.

[NDAlum]

Quote: Originally Posted by roadman

There are some GGer's that are worth the cause, though. I just wish more GCer's were more sim in nature vs tourney. Please take a look at the last post in the Vidoegraphy thread in this forum. The thread is stickied at the top and it's post #171. There needs to be a toggle switch for tourney mode and sim mode. That way, you can have all the tourney players play "perfect football, no bad snaps over the center or punter, no penalties, no wind direction, and winner take all 200 grand prizes. Sim mode for all the folks who have needs for penalties and bad snaps in the game. Here is the link, Sim does a nice job of pointing out the bad and the good. http://www.operationsports.com/forum...ox-one-18.html

Couldn't agree more man, well said.




Sent from my iPhone 5