My Jags are getting no love!!

[bmike904]

Quote: Originally Posted by tmart14

Correct me if I'm wrong... You can edit anything at anytime now right? So why does it matter? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes and I will be making some edits in CFM (not just Jaguars) but this matters in online CFM and head 2 head online. It's all good though

[raiderphantom]

Quote: Originally Posted by bmike904

I would say yes. But the one thing everyone has agreed on is that Telvin Smith is without a doubt above an 80 overall. And yes I pay attention to overall because it is supposed to be just that, how good is he "overall" haha. I'm just trying to give the good players on the Jags some shine as they seem to be over looked often times.

Telvin is an awful run defender. Sounds about right to me.

[bmike904]

Quote: Originally Posted by raiderphantom

Telvin is an awful run defender. Sounds about right to me.

Definitely not. Look at his tackles I'm willing to bet a lot of those were vs the run. I've watched almost every game of his at FSU and in Jax. It's all good though I can edit a little bit.

[bucky60]

Quote: Originally Posted by Brian3113

If you are that worried about OVR, and not looking at individual category numbers for how you play the game, you are playing Madden wrong.

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

Best post of the thread.

Quote: Originally Posted by tmart14

Correct me if I'm wrong... You can edit anything at anytime now right? So why does it matter?

The only reason I'm concerned with overall and it's accuracy is how it effects CFM AI depth charts, both AI and user contract negotiations, trade value, etc. It makes a big difference in a franchise. So it is important.

[scooterperpetual]

Quote: Originally Posted by bmike904

I know 88 is definitely good but I'm just saying with those stats at his age he would be higher on a lot of other teams. Deandre Hopkins is good example -- he had a breakout year and he is a top 5 WR now. Josh Norman is the best in the game after one great year. I personally think Josh Norman will be exposed playing in Washington vs the great Carolina defense Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DeAndre Hopkins had a very solid 2014 where as Robinson had a mediocre 2014. Robinson's rating is close to what Hopkins was last year coming a slightly better year (2013) than Robinsons 2014. Rated completely fairly IMO. Matter of fact with the new rating scale he is rated even better, and he had a worse year.

As others have mentioned though edit away.

[tmart14]

Quote: Originally Posted by bucky60

The only reason I'm concerned with overall and it's accuracy is how it effects CFM AI depth charts, both AI and user contract negotiations, trade value, etc. It makes a big difference in a franchise. So it is important.

Those are good points.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JoshC1977]

Quote: Originally Posted by bucky60

The only reason I'm concerned with overall and it's accuracy is how it effects CFM AI depth charts, both AI and user contract negotiations, trade value, etc. It makes a big difference in a franchise. So it is important.

You're right....BUT it is all relative. Also, don't forget the importance of scheme fit....another critical piece here.

[Senor Tortilla]

Before you go bashing Deandre Hopkins, remember that he put up a 1,200 yd 6 TD season with Ryan Fitzpatrick, and then a 1,500 yd 11 TD season with Brian Hoyer. Not saying Robinson doesn't deserve love, but Hopkins has put up good numbers for 2 years now with a much less than desireable situation under center.

As for Edelman, one of the best route runners in the game, but such a system guy. If he's on any other team, not sure he would produce nearly as much. I don't think the same argument could be made about Jones, Bryant, Brown, Beckham Jr. and some others who could succeed in other systems.