I'll take your bait.
First, a couple of disclaimers:
- This is only my opinion.
- I did ZERO with Madden this year, it was all NCAA this cycle.
Those out of the way, I don't imagine that my involvement on the NCAA side of things is any different than the involvement of the EA SPORT Game Changers on the Madden side. I'll be the first to tell you that I know for a fact that my involvement has shaped the NCAA Football series.
Have I been able to see everything I hope to see happen occur in one cycle? No. Have I seen many changes happen this cycle? Yes. Many of the changes made at my suggestion you might never know unless you look for it. Examples include; recruiting screen layouts, tuning in Heisman recruiting in dynasty, many balancing adjustments in recruiting, tuning to how players react in situations, etc. If you could have seen the difference in "Total Control Passing" from the first day we saw it until now it would be obvious how our feedback is utilized.
I imagine it is frustrating for the "outsider" to imagine how the Game Changer program works, even though it is possibly the most transparent part of EA SPORTS. I think many don't feel we actually accomplish anything. I know how useful we are because we are constantly the conduit used by EA SPORTS when they want feedback.
To your larger question, what effect (sic) has the Madden community had on change? I think the answer is far more complicated than I can express. Without vocal communities there would have been no interaction from EA. Without that interaction the potential for utilization wouldn't have existed. Without recognizing that potential the Game Changers wouldn't have been born.
I'll say this: my opinion is that the Game Changers collectively are the most powerful influence on the games at Tiburon currently, outside of the team AT Tiburon. There was a time that individual online communities held more sway, but the Game Changers are supposed to reflect the desires of those communities now. That is a responsibility I think about constantly.
In anticipation of your follow up question: Then why is it that you could affect ____ but not ____?
The answer to that has many facets, some things don't change because:
- The development road map dictates the change will occur in the future.
- The underlying implementation makes the change either high risk or difficult.
- It is too late in the cycle to confirm the effects of the change suggested.
- The change is considered lower priority than other items currently being worked on.
- Cost vs Reward is low.
- The design is functioning as EA intends (i.e. my opinion is vetoed by theirs)
- Other Game Changers disagree with my wants.
Shaun