Are you kidding me?

[Krodis]

Quote: Originally Posted by stux

How much College experience did Matt Jones have?

Matt Jones ran a 4.4, had a 40+" vertical, and was 6'4".

Pat White ran a 4.5 and is 6 feet tall.

[SHO]

That's perfect for Pat.

[AC IS ART]

Quote: Originally Posted by da ThRONe

Those look pretty much the same to me.

This.

[sooners52794]

Quote: Originally Posted by Krodis

Matt Jones ran a 4.4, had a 40+" vertical, and was 6'4". Pat White ran a 4.5 and is 6 feet tall.

they have yet to make height and weight factor into ratings yet, and weight means almost nothing when actually playing the game also so...

[Krodis]

Quote: Originally Posted by sooners52794

they have yet to make height and weight factor into ratings yet, and weight means almost nothing when actually playing the game also so...

I was responding to the person who threw out Matt Jones when I said it doesn't make sense to pick Pat White solely as a receiver where he was picked.

[stux]

Quote: Originally Posted by Krodis

Matt Jones ran a 4.4, had a 40+" vertical, and was 6'4". Pat White ran a 4.5 and is 6 feet tall.

Matt Jones played QB in college and started as a WR in the NFL.

Pat White played QB in college and will more then likely be tossed in as a wildcat QB and sometimes play WR. He could be listed as WR or a QB on the roster.

[kcarr]

Quote: Originally Posted by sooners52794

Yes my friend, you nailed it perfectly. ill bet if he was white people on here would give him more credit that is more than due, and dont deny it. hes much better than troy smith, VY, and Dixon IMO, because hes not that type of qb, and thats where i think some of you fail. i never thought VY would be a very good player, and trust me, he wont. this guy is a legit nfl qb, not some super fast freak of nature who was taught how to throw,and deserves a 71, because he has more than proven himself. but anyone with brains knows that these new ratings are a joke, i mean cmon. they got a lot of work to do. get serious...if any other second round picks were in the 60's, which would be accurate by ians logic (for a rookie), id be fine but hes clearly the outlier in all of the first day picks. but cmon, im pretty sure he said crabtree would be a 79 in the new logic, but these would prolly be the exact same if this was madden 08, except white would prolly be high 60's. i was actually thinking i made a good decision getting a 360 over a ps3, despite having to play the show on my ps2. i was just thinking "damn, i want some high definition ryan howard! but o sht, madden is gonna b sweet this year." but no, i come on here and see this pitiful bs. i hope my 360 rrod's so i can get a ps3 and play the best sports game ever made, and say next year yet again to madden...

There were 4 other 2nd round picks rated in the lower part of the 60s. Also there were 3 that were not rated.

As for that part that he has proven himself, he has shown that he can run a spread offense. We have seen how well that proves a players ability to pass in an NFL style offense.

[sooners52794]

Quote: Originally Posted by Krodis

I was responding to the person who threw out Matt Jones when I said it doesn't make sense to pick Pat White solely as a receiver where he was picked.

oh then i agree...i dont think pat white liked the idea of not being a qb in the nfl, so he wasnt gonna be a pure wr anyways