Home

EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

This is a discussion on EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart within the Madden NFL Old Gen forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Old Gen
A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2009, 01:18 PM   #9
Banned
 
OVR: 10
Join Date: Jun 2009
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obelysk
I was always under the impression that the NT plays the A gap between the RG and C while the 3 technique plays on top of the LG. Just looking at this article to me it seems that way at least:

http://www.trojanfootballanalysis.co...z_schemes.html
That would make sense as teams usually like to run to the strong side of the formation. The RT is more physical, where as the LT is more atheletic and a better pass blocker. TEs usually lines up on the right side of the formation; it makes more sense for the NT, the most physical DT, to line up between the C and RG.
Dmacho is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:21 PM   #10
MVP
 
mattlanta's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,398
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmacho
That would make sense as teams usually like to run to the strong side of the formation. The RT is more physical, where as the LT is more atheletic and a better pass blocker. TEs usually lines up on the right side of the formation; it makes more sense for the NT, the most physical DT, to line up between the C and RG.
That makes sense ... but that's not usually the case. Most NFL teams have their weaker but better pass rusher lining up between the C and the RG (under tackle) while their nose tackles are lining up between the C and the LG (nose tackle).
mattlanta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:28 PM   #11
Banned
 
OVR: 10
Join Date: Jun 2009
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

Quote:
Originally Posted by AboveTheRim
Defensive Tackles are useless in Madden, sometime and I mean sometimes I can get off a tackle and stuff someone running the ball. We need real blocking and DL
There's never any push whether it's the DT getting pushed back by the olineman, or the DT pushing the Olineman into the backfield. DT's as well as Olineman are irrelevant in Madden 10.
Dmacho is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 11-07-2009, 02:34 PM   #12
Rookie
 
mjacks10's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Memphis,TN
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattlanta
That makes sense ... but that's not usually the case. Most NFL teams have their weaker but better pass rusher lining up between the C and the RG (under tackle) while their nose tackles are lining up between the C and the LG (nose tackle).
I agree with this. So does Ross Tucker.

Quote:
Without question the most difficult of the interior line positions, right guards are most likely to be left one-on-one with an elite inside rusher. The predominance of teams to slide their center to the left to protect the quarterback's blind side creates a greater value for the right guard position.
On LGs:
Quote:
All of these players are considered upper echelon and likely grade out among the highest linemen on their respective teams. Part of that is because they are good players, but a lot of it has to do with the fact they are much more likely to receive help from the center and thus less likely to create a negative play. The formula is simple: Less one-on-ones against defensive linemen means less chances to give up a sack or pressure.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ankings/1.html

Generally your two gap DT lines up against the LG, and your pass rusher is on the RG. It doesn't really matter as far as the game goes, but I tend to set my depth chart based on the insight I gained from this article among others.

Last edited by mjacks10; 11-07-2009 at 02:36 PM.
mjacks10 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 04:05 PM   #13
Banned
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Sep 2009
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

I am a firm believer that there is actually very little football logic used in the programming of defensive front seven. Linebackers don't scrape to the ball, and no one maintains any sense of gap control defense.

So I haven't tested what ur talking about in your original post but it wouldn't surprise me. There are four distinct positions on the DL. Why madden devs don't incorporate into the game is a mystery.
marcus82 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 05:29 PM   #14
MVP
 
Palo20's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Dec 2006
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

I agree the OP other than the fact that there is no strong and weak side in Madden so it doesn't really matter. Teams that use a true NT will have him on the center and then the UT on the strong side of the formation.

Then many teams will have strong and weak DEs: better pass rusher on the weak side.

Until Madden recognizes strong and weak side it pretty much won't matter.
Palo20 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 06:59 PM   #15
Rookie
 
z ROCKnROLLA z's Arena
 
OVR: 13
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tampico, Mexico, I love PUGS!!!
Blog Entries: 5
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

ok so the result its to put ur #1 DT at #2.

My understanding is that the NT lines up next to the RE.

check the link out its quiet clear here!!!

http://football.calsci.com/DefensiveLine.html
__________________
Madden IQ 800
My Myspace - http://www.myspace.com/zrocknrollaz

z ROCKnROLLA z is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 11-07-2009, 07:41 PM   #16
MVP
 
OVR: 23
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, England
Blog Entries: 7
Re: EA's misunderstanding of the DT's in a depth chart

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hootiefish
Madden needs to get rid of their archaic position system as a whole.

WR1, WR2, RB1, ROLB, LOLB ... none of these positions actually exist!

We need positions based off of the specific offense, we need D-Line rotations, LB rotations, etc.

And we've needed it for a long time.
Agreed. Madden seems to do it in the least logical way you can think of.
Cryolemon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Old Gen »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM.
Top -