Home

EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)

This is a discussion on EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku) within the Madden NFL Old Gen forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Old Gen
A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-22-2012, 12:08 PM   #1
Editor-in-Chief
 
Steve_OS's Arena
 
OVR: 77
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: OS Eastern Office
Posts: 32,315
Blog Entries: 556
EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)


Kotaku's Owen Good has posted an article detailing his thoughts on how EA's "Military Helicopter" lawsuit affects the Madden license.

Quote:
Of all ironies, it's Electronic Arts now asking a judge to rule that some video game depictions of real-life names and symbols and products don't need a license.

The video games publisher is suing the maker of a military helicopter, plainly hoping to establish a precedent that expands creative freedom for all video game developers. But if EA's notorious for anything involving licenses, it's the ones it holds that prevent others from building similar games.

So is EA going to kill its own golden goose, which makes Madden the sole NFL football game, and Need for Speed the only place where you'll find Porsche? That seems doubtful, even if they win out all the way to the Supreme Court.
Platform: Xbox 360 / PS3
__________________
Steve Noah
Editor-in-Chief
http://www.operationsports.com
Follow me on Twitter
Steve_OS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 01-22-2012, 04:15 PM   #2
MVP
 
kjcheezhead's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: May 2009
Blog Entries: 1
Re: EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)

Quote:
That doesn't mean it's open season for anyone to make a sports video game without league permission. My guess is if Tecmo were to do today what it did in 1989, it could expect a lawsuit from the NFL, if not on legal principle then at least to defend the value of the league's exclusive license. Anyone doing this kind of thing also risks a court order prohibiting even the game's development as the matter is tried.
Further, to build a game without a license would be an act of war that ended not only any hope of future cooperation with the NFL and the NFLPA, but many other sports leagues and unions would likely refuse, too. If not out of solidarity or legal principle, why do business with someone who'd otherwise turn around and use your likenesses, maybe with a few fig-leaf alterations, for free?
That explains why 2k and SCEA haven't made a generic game to all those who are always asking.

Quote:
But that's not to say that these licenses couldn't become less expensive if another developer actually builds a game with no league permission. It wouldn't have to be a full console disc, either, it could just simply be an independent game that, if the NFL doesn't or can't stop it, diminishes the premium EA Sports pays for exclusivity.
I think Tecmo Throwback missed their chance on this one. If they had used the correct team colors and current player likenesses with fake names, it might have set a precedent.



I still think the lack of a competitor waiting to jump in if EA drops the ball diminishes the value of exclusivity but it doesn't matter if EA contiues to pay it I guess.
kjcheezhead is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 04:42 PM   #3
Banned
 
OVR: 10
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland
Yea but even if they pay for the license, if they are constantly losing revenue every year, then it's not worth the price and they have too 1) ask for reducing the price 2) improve the game to simulation and less casual 3) not extend the license. I think from a business standpoint they renew the license, but they have too totally change there culture if the sales are going too improve.
adfletch71 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:45 PM   #4
Banned
 
OVR: 28
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,301
Blog Entries: 2
Re: EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)

There will never be another NFL game made. There is no sense in worrying about it. EA has already succeeded in ruining video game football. Madden has been a terrible and total fail. The football gameplay is just short of atrocious and it's missing the majority of the things that make NFL football what it is. Every year, we go through this discussion. It's pointless. The only thing you can hope for is that someday EA can get it right, but that's been a lost cause too. EA will spend their last dollar on that license if they have to.

Forget about another football game, forget about the end of the exclusive. If I was 2k, I would make a great generic football game that's 100% customizable. Create an amazing franchise mode that works online and offline and it would be successful. Like Chase said in his review on here, Madden is not a good simulation of the real NFL. It's an ok game that's fun to play for a while, but it falls way short of simulating the NFL. It lacks polish, innovation and is missing too much of the real NFL elements. Nothing will change this generation, the team put in place is mainly for the next generation of consoles. EA has a chance to get it right here, but their track record speaks otherwise. Maybe some day we will see football get to the level of the other sports genres.
GiantBlue76 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:52 PM   #5
Resident film pundit
 
Blzer's Arena
 
OVR: 55
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 42,391
Blog Entries: 8
Re: EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)

What about that thing a year or two back that said the NFLPA is really a union comprised of 32 separate entities? Was that just a rumor?
__________________
Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60
Blzer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 01-24-2012, 12:24 AM   #6
Banned
 
dfos81's Arena
 
OVR: 16
Join Date: Jun 2009
Re: EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)

Come on 2k, Natural Motion, and whoever else wants to get in on this creating a football sim and leaving the little details out to keep EA from crying foul, although they would still cry foul anyway.
dfos81 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 12:53 AM   #7
Pro
 
OVR: 3
Join Date: Dec 2009
Re: EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)

Oh boy, not again "sighs"
scoonie05 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 01:22 AM   #8
Banned
 
dfos81's Arena
 
OVR: 16
Join Date: Jun 2009
Re: EA Lawsuit Doesn’t Mean Madden’s Exclusive is a License to be Killed (Kotaku)

Remember EA fanboys lol! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...ajPL3Kna4&NR=1

Last edited by dfos81; 01-24-2012 at 01:31 AM. Reason: Updated video quality
dfos81 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Old Gen »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.
Top -