First review(funny)

[celtics6]

http://blogs.thescore.com/mlb/2013/0...+Blanked+(Blog))

It's the same game! Kind of disapointed myself. This series was looking up imo with last years game. But at least it's a sort of good review.

[malky]

Lol you knew it was going to happen .... The snark will more than likely get louder as more video game sites review

[econoodle]

i disagree, its NOT the same game.
but to each his/her own.

[celtics6]

Quote: Originally Posted by econoodle

i disagree, its NOT the same game. but to each his/her own.

I'm not saying you are wrong but I'd like some proof of this. I've watched tons of videos of 2k12 and 2k13 in HD qualtiy over the past few days and if there are differences it's very subtle. Extremely. I've watched the same teams head to head and I can't notice anything different. I guess i see what people are saying about possibly the faces being touched up a bit and having better attention to detail this year but that stuff could all be in my head.

If anyone wants to bring video proof to the table that the games are different by all means. The colors are definately adjusted slightly. That's been proven. New commentary. New rosters. 2k12 with patch version 1.2 was very solid though.

If someone wants to prove gameplay was touched by all means. I've been studying tape looking for hope of some changes. I'll buy it and spend the $60 if that's the case.

I've noticed the catchers seem to be touched up a bit. Their padding is more detailed and their motions seem smoother.

[bluejrdn5]

I pre ordered the game after trading in at GameStop and getting an extra 50% on trades.
I agree it is very similar to 2k12 , but there some improvements.
I noticed today while playing offline , when the ball gets by my catcher , the AI actually went to the next base.
Never did that in 2k12.
Noticed a few more little things.
Also , the computer seemed to handle the bullpen a lot better on default settings.
All in all , I really like it.

[pistolpete]

Not having played the game I do have to say that review was pretty funny.

Had 2k bothered to promote the game and made up some bogus new stuff, like a new bat-ball physics or smarter AI we'd probably consider it truth and the reviews would be more positive.

At least feed us some placebo people!

[SevenTwentyNine]

Now that's funny.

[Hockeynut99]

Quote: Originally Posted by celtics6

I'm not saying you are wrong but I'd like some proof of this. I've watched tons of videos of 2k12 and 2k13 in HD qualtiy over the past few days and if there are differences it's very subtle. Extremely. I've watched the same teams head to head and I can't notice anything different. I guess i see what people are saying about possibly the faces being touched up a bit and having better attention to detail this year but that stuff could all be in my head. If anyone wants to bring video proof to the table that the games are different by all means. The colors are definately adjusted slightly. That's been proven. New commentary. New rosters. 2k12 with patch version 1.2 was very solid though. If someone wants to prove gameplay was touched by all means. I've been studying tape looking for hope of some changes. I'll buy it and spend the $60 if that's the case. I've noticed the catchers seem to be touched up a bit. Their padding is more detailed and their motions seem smoother.

I will just say this. This game is what 2K12 should have been. More refined.