Good idea or bad?

[cardinalbird5]

I agree with tessi. Players do not get an artificial inflation to their attributes for playing at Coors but the ball does travel further there in the game, so indirectly Rockies hitters will hit better there on top of their current attributes.

This goes for other parks too like AT&T and PETCO. Players like Upton would have had better numbers if they played at Coors or in Chase field IRL.

I think it would be cool to see the attributes adjusted by their park and the quality of pitchers they face.

I am mainly an online player, so to me it does not feel right when I use Colorado on the road in an online game and I have the best lineup in the game. The same goes for Diamond Dynasty....

I am not complaining but I just think ballparks have a drastic effect on how players hit, so why not adjust them for the ratings?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[cardinalbird5]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

I just don't know how else to explain this to you. Attributes don't change in real life based on where you are playing, only ballpark affects do and that's accurately represented in the show. Dickerson doesn't have higher attributes playing in CO than he does anywhere else. The ballpark affect is what gives him better numbers. Thusly, when he changes teams, his attributes are still accurately represented.

The only MLB stadiums that have a stadium factor built in the game is Chase and Coors. Dickerson should not have 80 power at sea level and 5000 ft above sea level imo. If each ballpark had the elevation factor built in then I would agree.

With the current rosters, Colorado has the best lineup home or away. We all know Colorado is a mediocre offense on the road.

Again, I mainly play online...so Dickerson changing teams is irrelevant to the online community.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Will I Am]

Quote: Originally Posted by cardinalbird7

The only MLB stadiums that have a stadium factor built in the game is Chase and Coors. Dickerson should not have 80 power at sea level and 5000 ft above sea level imo. If each ballpark had the elevation factor built in then I would agree. With the current rosters, Colorado has the best lineup home or away. We all know Colorado is a mediocre offense on the road. Again, I mainly play online...so Dickerson changing teams is irrelevant to the online community. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You know this for fact, speaking of Coors and Chase? It wouldn't be right if a player can hit hrs. as easy in SF as in Cincinnati.

The players in Colorado should have lower power #'s to begin with if their overall power #'s are a result of how they hit in Coors.

[cardinalbird5]

Yes i heard it was Coors Chase and a few ST parks.

Agreed the players attributes should be slightly adjusted to compensate for elevation...I am sure guys like Dickerson and Cargo would be above average if they went to a different team but the splits do not lie.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk