JOHN WALL, MARTELL WEBSTER, BRADLEY BEAL AND NENE

[TroinIggs]

Quote: Originally Posted by Paul Pierce_OS

In the Eastern Conference I see them getting a 6th or 7th seed if healthy. They still need that #2 or #3 if Beal is looking to be the second option.

Well the point of what he was saying is if Wall was never injured, that's fine but what about if Rondo didn't get injured or stoudemire? We can play what ifs all we want but the fact is they are not contending for the playoffs right now. They could probably sneak into the 8 th seed over the bucks, but even that's doubtful.

[Paul Pierce_OS]

Quote: Originally Posted by TroinIggs

Well the point of what he was saying is if Wall was never injured, that's fine but what about if Rondo didn't get injured or stoudemire? We can play what ifs all we want but the fact is they are not contending for the playoffs right now. They could probably sneak into the 8 th seed over the bucks, but even that's doubtful.

1. Actually the Knicks are WAY better without Stoudimire this year.
2. I'm not even advocating a rating increase, I was just talking basketball.
3. I do think their slightly better then the Bucks, If you look at their roster it's not as bad as you think it is.

[LoSoisNiCEx414]

These Ratings are funny, So the Wizards deserve 4 players in the 80s? Lmao Wall could use a slight bump, but thats it imo. & give webster like corner specialist sig skill.

[TroinIggs]

Quote: Originally Posted by Paul Pierce_OS

1. Actually the Knicks are WAY better without Stoudimire this year. 2. I'm not even advocating a rating increase, I was just talking basketball. 3. I do think their slightly better then the Bucks, If you look at their roster it's not as bad as you think it is.

That's debatable, I'd much rather have Amare off the bench as center than that old fool Camby. They are not better without him off the bench, 14 more points off the bench rather than the 2 Camby or Kurt Thomas provide is worth it. I could deal with the defense.

They wouldn't beat the bucks in a playoffs series, Bucks have a pretty solid roster despite their record. Wizards have wall, beal, nene and a bunch of 3 pt shooters. Not a great roster.

[Paul Pierce_OS]

Quote: Originally Posted by TroinIggs

That's debatable, I'd much rather have Amare off the bench as center than that old fool Camby. They are not better without him off the bench, 14 more points off the bench rather than the 2 Camby or Kurt Thomas provide is worth it. I could deal with the defense. They wouldn't beat the bucks in a playoffs series, Bucks have a pretty solid roster despite their record. Wizards have wall, beal, nene and a bunch of 3 pt shooters. Not a great roster.

Their 16-13 when he plays.... That's nearly a .500 record and 28-13 without him. He clogs up the paint too much if you have him and Chandler out their to run that type of offense.

If they were completely healthy for the whole year they have a shot, Their still one or two pieces away IMO. I would move Okafor though and let Serphin start.

[steelers99_58_36]

Quote: Originally Posted by TroinIggs

Just one more point, you want Nene over 80? Chris Bosh is an 82 and Amare Stoudemire is an 83. Is Nene better than them? An 80 in this game represents a borderline star (JR Smith, Paul Gasol, Steph Curry who is a star). Why should Webster who no one has heard of be an 80? Ill admit he has a good shooting percentage, but so does Steve Novak, should he be an 80? Btw one time I saw Trevor Ariza make a 3 pointer, lets give him a 99 3 pt rating!!!!!

was anybody else laughing their a** off btw i completely agree

[Rockie_Fresh88]

I think there good where they are at. Wizards aren't a bad team since Wall returned they've been winning. But nobody needs an increase . They all play like themselves.

But Lakers do not play old and tired at all in this game .

[zten11]

I have John Wall at an 81. Beal is still a rookie so he should be mid 70's. Nene isn't that good anymore. He should be high 70's. Webster low to mid 70's.