Skyboxer's Player Lock (and not) Sliders

[grisch44]

Quote: Originally Posted by Skyboxer

Oregon ran over me with the new set... If not working for you .........other than totally lowering user Rush D all the way down the only step is hope for the online tuning to work or go to Heisman which I'm not doing. So far the new set is working for me. Sorry Nolefan

Skyboxer, who do you play with on D? I like to player lock on a DE but I'm having trouble getting realistic OL/DL interactions with any of the slider sets I've tried so far. I'll give yours a shot.

[Skyboxer]

Quote: Originally Posted by grisch44

Skyboxer, who do you play with on D? I like to player lock on a DE but I'm having trouble getting realistic OL/DL interactions with any of the slider sets I've tried so far. I'll give yours a shot.

CB or a SS

[Skyboxer]

Quote: Originally Posted by NoleFan

Oh no Skyboxer, these are working great for me. I just need to start a dynasty instead of playing all these daggum "Play Now" games. lol

Aaaaah gotcha. Yeah they are working for me and while I'm not totally satisfied with CPU running it's playable and a whole lot of fun! I'm getting ready to play my second game with zero for rush D for user....

[Skyboxer]

Ok Stats with 0 User Rush D

Fl St
21 Points
35 rushes for 165 yards
19 Completions out of 33 attempts for 273 yards and 3 TD's

Started:
Ty Jones 20 Carries for 135 Yards 6.7 average with a long of 38


WVU 26 points (Thanks to a pick 6)
32 Rushes for 135 yards (I player locked on QB)
17 Completions of 29 attempts for 199 yards and 1 TD


Started:
Noel Devine 18 Carries for 106 yards 5.8 average with a long of 14 yards


Updated first post

I'm done...Yeah I know I said it before and in all seriousness...just tweak the running for CPU to suit your needs as this is about as good IMO as you're going to get with player lock. The Fl State game was really fun as I had to start to worry about then running the ball also. And That was refreshing

HAVE FUN AND FADE TO BLACK>>>>>>>>.

.............................................

..............................The End

[grisch44]

Played with your latest set in an Ohio State dynasty game. Here were the results. I player locked on QB on O and DE on D:

PSU 28 at OSU (me) 31
14 First Downs 15
337 Total O 383
31-111-2 Rush-Yds-TD 23-120-3
13-18-2 Comp-Att-TD 16-27-1
226 Passing Yds 263
4-8 3rd down conv 2-8
1 turnover each and TOP was close to even

Overall, felt pretty good. I did feel like there was quite a bit of "suction blocking" going on with the CPU run game but not sure how to avoid that and still get the CPU appropriate YPC. It was odd that my DT who I don't control had 8 tackles and led the team. I run a 3-4 D and typically one of my inside LB's is the leading tackler.

[Skyboxer]

Quote: Originally Posted by grisch44

Played with your latest set in an Ohio State dynasty game. Here were the results. I player locked on QB on O and DE on D: PSU 28 at OSU (me) 31 14 First Downs 15 337 Total O 383 31-111-2 Rush-Yds-TD 23-120-3 13-18-2 Comp-Att-TD 16-27-1 226 Passing Yds 263 4-8 3rd down conv 2-8 1 turnover each and TOP was close to even Overall, felt pretty good. I did feel like there was quite a bit of "suction blocking" going on with the CPU run game but not sure how to avoid that and still get the CPU appropriate YPC. It was odd that my DT who I don't control had 8 tackles and led the team. I run a 3-4 D and typically one of my inside LB's is the leading tackler.

I haven't really notice a big amount of suction blocking EXCEPT on FG Block and Punt block where it's pretty bad...

[Skyboxer]

1-1 in my USM dynasty...
Was feeling pretty good until Va Tech came to town.
They scored 31 unanswered points in the 2nd half to erase a 4 point lead by us...
It was an trouncing , yet enjoyable, game.

[DJ]

Man, the CPU is definitely dangerous running the ball now. Wake Forest had a pair of backs that were tough for my FSU defenders to contain, and even the QB scrambled for a couple of nice gains. I still won 31-14 but it was nice to see the CPU run for well over 100 yards.