09-21-2009, 06:37 PM
|
#6
|
MVP
|
Re: Whats The % Thing Mean Beside Some Plays
Look at your playbook by "formation" (as opposed to by "play type" or "player). You'll see lots of pairs of plays with chain links between them. Those are your linked plays. Call one of them and the other will become X% setup depending on how well you did with the play. The better the gain, the more the linked play will be setup. Once a play is completely "setup" there is a better chance that it'll work than if it is 0-99% setup up. A 99% setup play has the same chance of working as a 0% setup play.
That's why you'd want to avoid a partially setup play until it's fully setup. If I run iso twice and get PA iso 75% setup, PA iso has the same chance of working as when it was at 0%. If I run PA iso, its "setup-ed-ness" will reset so I wasted that 75%. If I run iso 2 more times and get PA iso to be "setup" (it'll be bordered with green and say "setup") and then run PA iso, there's a better chance of it working because the defense is expecting the play to be an iso play instead.
If you care, you get +8 strategy points if you get a 1st down or TD by using a setup play. PA setup plays are much, much more effective than setup running plays. The linking goes both ways (IE. iso setups up PA iso, but PA iso also sets up iso) but I haven't had much more success running a setup running play than running a non-setup running play.
EDIT:
I should also add that running a non-setup play is not a disadvantage. They aren't reduced in effectiveness. They are normal. Fully setup plays are boosted above normal. You could never run a fully setup play and be just fine. Since I like to use most of my playbook, my non-flexbone teams rarely run any setup plays since I don't call the same play often enough to setup its linked play.
__________________
Favorite Teams:
College #1: Michigan Wolverines
College #2: Michigan State Spartans (my alma mater)
College #3: North Carolina Tar Heels
NHL: Detroit Redwings
Last edited by jello1717; 09-21-2009 at 06:40 PM.
|
|
|