|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by acarrero |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fight Night should be the better game. First, it has better athletes than Undisputed. You just can't compare a game with athletes like Ali, Tyson, and Frazier, Pacquiao, Cotto to one with Spider Silva, and whoever else is good in MMA. Obviously I'm not a big MMA fan, but lets face it, it's not the big leagues of fighting - the real money and the really good athletes are in boxing. The tradition also counts for something.
That being said, MVP 06: NCAA Baseball was a better baseball game than any MLB game released that year despite inferior athletes being featured, so Undisputed could be the better video game. I just think with the amount of time and money EA has spent on Fight Night, plus all the intangibles that boxing has over a new sport like MMA, it's expected that Fight Night will be the bigger, better game. But I must admit I'm intrigued by the MMA demo. I might just download it. Even people who don't like MMA are raving about it, so this is certainly a good question you bring up. It's possible MMA lends itself better to video games than boxing, but that's hard to believe considering the rules of each sport and how MMA features both wrestling and boxing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOW...It is amazing how LITTLE you actual know about MMA. A str8 up boxer, even the likes of Tyson and ALi would never last 2 minutes in a cage with ANY of the current or PAST MMA greats. Would love to see what Tyson would do when he is on his back, would be amusing to say the least.
Boxers train and train hard. They focus on a couple of aspects. MMA fighters have to prepare for 5 times as many potential situations since their oponents are SKLIIED in several different areas.
No offense, but boxers are babies compared to most MMA fighters.
MOST boxers fight for HUGE money. MMA fighters do it to put the hurt on an oponent then worry about the money.
That being said..."MMA fighters are not the best athletes".
OK.
Watch a few fights and then share your opinion.