WWE Off-Topic

[cima]

Yeah there was a brand split PPV schedule released last month, Clash of Champions is gonna be a RAW PPV

-WWE Battleground: July 24 in Brooklyn, 8pm EST start time, both brands

-WWE SummerSlam: August 21st in Brooklyn, 7pm EST start time, both brands

-WWE Backlash: September 11th in Richmond, 8pm EST start time, SmackDown event, WWE Network exclusive

-WWE Clash of the Champions: September 25th in Indianapolis, 8pm EST start time, RAW event

-WWE No Mercy: October 9th in Sacramento, 8pm EST start time, SmackDown event

-WWE Hell In a Cell: October 30th in Boston, 8pm EST start time, RAW event

-WWE Survivor Series: November 20th in Toronto, 7pm EST start time, both brands

-WWE TLC: December 4th in Dallas, 8pm EST start time, SmackDown event

-WWE Roadblock, December 18th in Pittsburgh, 8pm EST start time, RAW event


Read more at http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/7221...7jkVBt4y4bw.99

[IndianBird]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mercury112491

What's the difference? Or is it just cool because it's a nod back to the old PPV name? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, the nod is cool.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

#WolvesUp

[dubcity]

You'd think with smaller rosters on each show they'd realize that maybe they don't need a PPV for each brand every month, but oh well.

It's not like it's a necessity just to ensure the champions defend once a month, since they have no problem booking title matches on TV with little or no notice. They could do a Super Raw or Smackdown on the months that each brand doesn't have a PPV.

[SPTO]

I would LOVE to see just 4 PPV per brand and 4 megashows (WM, SummerSlam, Royal Rumble, Survivor Series)

Dunno what you'd do with Royal Rumble though.

[dubcity]

Quote: Originally Posted by SPTO

I would LOVE to see just 4 PPV per brand and 4 megashows (WM, SummerSlam, Royal Rumble, Survivor Series) Dunno what you'd do with Royal Rumble though.

I would have zero PPVs between RR and WM, but I'm crazy like that.

[redsox4evur]

Quote: Originally Posted by dubcity

I would have zero PPVs between RR and WM, but I'm crazy like that.

I mean it's only a month or so between the two so it could work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Majingir]

I'd have a PPV before WM, but make it brand specific. Whichever brand the rumble winner DOESN'T choose to challenge their champion, gets that PPV, and main event of the PPV is the #1 contenders match to see who faces that brands champion at WM.

[Jm0ney2001]

I like the two ppvs a month. If they truly are going to compete that's a big part of why the last brand extension failed. The two month gap was impossible for the writers to book for. So then they went back to combo shows every month. Now it's just another bonus for having the wwe network too. I really think they are trying their best to recreate what made wrestling so popular in the Monday night wars. It's a great time to be a wrestling fan imo