Home

Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

This is a discussion on Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this? within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
From Guaranteed to Never Happening, a College Football 26 Wishlist
2025 Sports Video Game Predictions
The Operation Sports 2024 Game of the Year Is EA Sports College Football 25
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-01-2024, 12:46 AM   #9
MVP
 
PowerofRed25's Arena
 
OVR: 13
Join Date: Jul 2011
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

If this was Cover 4 Palms, then this is technically the way it is supposed to work, but it isn't implemented well. In Palms, the #1 CB and the Safety are combo reading the #2 (Slot) WR. If the #2 WR goes to the flat, the CB will pass the #1 WR to the Safety and pick up the Slot WR. If the #2 WR goes vertical, the #1 CB will stick with the #1 WR and the Nickel and Safety will essentially split the difference on #2 and any crossers.

That is exactly what happened on this play; however, the problem is that the "flat" is considered anywhere from the LOS to 10 yards and the game does not differentiate vertical stems on routes. This looks like it was an 8 to 10 yard out route and so as soon as the #2 WR broke, the #1 CB jumped that and passed the #1 WR to the FS because the programming says "if #2 goes flat, #1 CB takes him."

In real life, everyone would consider this #2 WR to be "vertical" off the line of scrimmage so immediately #1 CB is on #1 WR, Nickel and FS combo the #2 WR. The game makes no effort to differentiate WR releases, so it can only react once a receiver acts. Which is obviously a problem in a situation like this replay where the #1 WR is already 20 yards down the field and well past the safety by the time the flat read triggers.

In game, I tend to only run Palms vs 3x1 and instead use a Cover 6 or Cover 9 with the Quarter-Quarter side of the coverage to the field and Half to the boundary vs 2x2 formations like in this video. It isn't realistic, C4 Palms is a fantastic 2x2 coverage in real life, but it just doesn't work as expected consistently in the game unless you're willing to manually control the FS.
PowerofRed25 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2024, 09:12 AM   #10
Pro
 
Orange Krush's Arena
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Jun 2013
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

This is cover 4 palms and it looks like a cover 2 shell to me. The corner and safety are reading the release of WR2, if he runs out then the coverage plays like cover 2 with the corner taking the out route and the safety taking the deep route. Because WR2 gets collisioned by the apex his break gets delayed, causing the read the be delayed. As soon as he breaks out the corner leaves his man and the safety tries to take the deep route but it’s too late and he’s out of position.
Orange Krush is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2024, 10:43 AM   #11
Pro
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Apr 2013
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

I get burnt in nearly every game in Deep Zone Coverage when I don't direct my DBs to give cushion (Triangle or Y, LS Up). But that did not look like a Cover 4. Even if it was Cover 2, it looked like the CB and FS switched their assignment when the FS was not in position to do so. The CB appeared to start looking back toward the QB before he abandoned the WR coverage, so he blew his coverage if he was supposed to protect a deep zone.


Regardless of the defensive call, the FS did not get the depth he should have if he had deep responsibility. Cover 2 deep responsibility demands the FS and SS stay deeper than the deepest receiver on their half of the field. The FS appeared as if he was playing the slot receiver instead of respecting his deep zone assignment. That is often the way my deep safeties play when I don't instruct them to give cushion. Word of warning, you will likely get lit up underneath if you always give cushion so pick your spots.
sherrane is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 10-01-2024, 11:26 AM   #12
All Star
 
jello1717's Arena
 
OVR: 16
Join Date: Feb 2006
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

I assumed it was cover 4 quarters since I tend to play quarters vs 2x2 and palms vs 3x1, but from the comments it looks like I definitely erroneously called Palms instead. It was also definitely a cover 2 shell as I usually use cover 2 shells to disguise my cover 4s.

Did my cover 2 shell help contribute to this blown coverage? Should I not use shells? I’ve found that using shells helps a LOT with my coverage as they tend to confuse the QB for a bit, forcing him to hold the ball too long so my 4 rushers can get pressure.

Am I understanding it correctly, that if this would’ve been quarters instead of palms, then the CB wouldn’t have left WR#1 and wouldn’t have been burned?

If the slot hadn’t run into my nickel, do you think the FS would’ve gotten to WR1 in time? Did this particular play just have bad luck with the delayed out route, or would this result be pretty common for a streak + out?

I know in my CPB I have plenty of plays where on one or even both sides of the field WR#1 runs a streak while the slot does an out, so it sounds like I need to be extra careful not to use palms if it’s 2x2.

Also completely unrelated, but to show off my coverage reading skillz, that route combo has resulted in me throwing more interceptions than any other combo in the game. Every interception on that combo comes from me thinking the CB is following the streak and I’ve got an easy completion on the out, only to have the CB sit down on the out route and just patiently waiting while I throw the ball right to him….. I’m so bad that I’ve basically just abandoned that read as it’s clear I’ll never get it right.
__________________
Favorite Teams:
College #1: Michigan Wolverines
College #2: Michigan State Spartans (my alma mater)
College #3: North Carolina Tar Heels
NHL: Detroit Redwings
jello1717 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2024, 11:34 AM   #13
MVP
 
UtahUtes32's Arena
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,666
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jello1717
Less than 2 minutes left in the game, I’m up 14 (thankfully) and I call a dime cover 4 match play (I believe quarters, but it could’ve been palms). The 2 flankers runs streaks while the slots run shorter routes.

My CB on the left (deep zone responsibility) runs stride for stride with the streak for 15 yards, and then turns around (leaving his guy wide open and uncovered) to run to the underneath route (looks like it might’ve been an out, but the route was interrupted by running into a defender). The guy he’s running to is already completely covered by my nickel or dime back. So he isn’t even leaving his man to cover an open receiver as the guy he leaves for is smothered by another defender.

Is there anything I can do to prevent this behavior? I know I can’t use coverage adjustments as they’ll cancel out the match overage. Was it a bad play call? I thought maybe my user controlled guy (a LB) was maybe out of position, but even if he was (I don’t think so) it didn’t leave some receiver open to compel my CB to abandon his guy to cover the one I was supposed to.

https://youtu.be/DBRGLVMDHcU?si=sP7dhuyaLoO8WsQ7

That looks like you called cover 4 palms, did you?
UtahUtes32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2024, 11:37 AM   #14
MVP
 
UtahUtes32's Arena
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,666
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jello1717
....but from the comments it looks like I definitely erroneously called Palms instead.....

....Did my cover 2 shell help contribute to this blown coverage? ....

First, while I think that is definitely Palms, it didn't play 100% as it should. My guess is it's because you used a cover 2 shell?


The Outside CB's first read in Palms is the #2 receiver (slot here). If he runs a shallow to the OUTSIDE, then he passes #1 ("flanker") to the safety for deep responsibility.


The whole think looks weird, and I'm guessing it's caused by using a pre-snap shell (cov2?)
UtahUtes32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2024, 11:54 AM   #15
Pro
 
Orange Krush's Arena
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Jun 2013
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jello1717
I assumed it was cover 4 quarters since I tend to play quarters vs 2x2 and palms vs 3x1, but from the comments it looks like I definitely erroneously called Palms instead. It was also definitely a cover 2 shell as I usually use cover 2 shells to disguise my cover 4s.

Did my cover 2 shell help contribute to this blown coverage? Should I not use shells? I’ve found that using shells helps a LOT with my coverage as they tend to confuse the QB for a bit, forcing him to hold the ball too long so my 4 rushers can get pressure.

Am I understanding it correctly, that if this would’ve been quarters instead of palms, then the CB wouldn’t have left WR#1 and wouldn’t have been burned?

If the slot hadn’t run into my nickel, do you think the FS would’ve gotten to WR1 in time? Did this particular play just have bad luck with the delayed out route, or would this result be pretty common for a streak + out?

I know in my CPB I have plenty of plays where on one or even both sides of the field WR#1 runs a streak while the slot does an out, so it sounds like I need to be extra careful not to use palms if it’s 2x2.

Also completely unrelated, but to show off my coverage reading skillz, that route combo has resulted in me throwing more interceptions than any other combo in the game. Every interception on that combo comes from me thinking the CB is following the streak and I’ve got an easy completion on the out, only to have the CB sit down on the out route and just patiently waiting while I throw the ball right to him….. I’m so bad that I’ve basically just abandoned that read as it’s clear I’ll never get it right.
I think the cover 2 shell directly caused this issue. Had you been aligned in the default cover 4 look, I don’t think you would have gotten a collision on WR2 from the apex, which would have given the DBs a more immediate read on his out release, which would have let them switch in time to cover the deep ball. Palms is basically cover 0 man on deep routes, if you misalign the DBs you put yourself in a bad leverage situation.

Had you called quarters, you would have ended up with 2on1 on the fade.

Palms is a great coverage against 2x2 formations, it’s best when those two guys are close so the DBs are in better position for the very/out combo.

Personally, I prefer to run palms vs 2x2 and quarters vs 3x1.
Orange Krush is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 10-01-2024, 11:59 AM   #16
All Star
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Missouri
Re: Is there a way to prevent my guys from completely blowing a coverage like this?

Probably palms but op failed to say what attributes the corner and safety have. Play recognition and zone coverage.

Attributes matter in this game.
__________________
tessl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 AM.
Top -