Which Dynasty Way Offers You Most Fun & Satisfaction?

[Collegefbfan]

Just curious which of these provides you with the most fun and satisfaction.
Coaching up a very low level team to a powerhouse.
Coaching up your favorite team to maintain powerhouse status if they already are or build them up to one if they aren’t.
Coaching up a mid level team to powerhouse status.
Any other idea you have.

[steve_studnuts]

I like taking Ohio State and making them the worst team in the country.

[canes21]

As long as I can get what I perceive as an authentic challenge then the tier of school doesn't really matter. What bores me is winning beyond what I feel is true to a team's capability. Going 11-1 with a good team and having only 2-3 challenging games vs the only other quality teams I play is fine with me. Going 4-8 and struggling in every game with a bad team is equally as fun for me.

Even getting hot with a good team and getting great results over a short span can be fun. It is only when I do something like take Kennesaw State and have them as a title contender in year 2 that I begin to lose interest and quickly.

Simply put, I want a dynasty experience that I personally find believable.

[Ghost Of The Year]

I like to take a MAC team, almost any MAC team, and build them into a bonafide dynasty.

I also like to do the same with Syracuse.

Quote: Originally Posted by steve_studnuts

I like taking Ohio State and making them the worst team in the country.

This is what I'm talking about. I did the same thing to Rutgers. By the time they fired me, they were garbage,
fit right in with the rest of the Garbage State.