Why isnt Reebok apart of the game?

[shanemaddox]

Maybe I'm not TOO dumb.

Adidas bought Reebok in 2006 for 3.8 billion.
Reebok is based in Massachusetts.
Boston College wanted to keep the Reebok name.

Shane

PS. Sorry to monopolize this thread.

[Squeezee12]

yeah Boston College is the only team that comes to mind that still uses Reebok. Prolly others Im sure. I know that New Balance and Russel have their hands on a few teams. But this sport (college football anyways) is dominated by Nike, Adidas and Under Armor.

[ugadawgs29]

Ok, I know I haven't really read the thread, but I think they are trying to focus on gameplay and presentation rather than the brand that makes the stuff.

[Squeezee12]

Quote: Originally Posted by ugadawgs29

Ok, I know I haven't really read the thread, but I think they are trying to focus on gameplay and presentation rather than the brand that makes the stuff.

yeah if it is only a few schools that use Reebok then it wouldnt bother me if the brand never made it in. But a lot of people are very much into getting the details right for their team (understandably so).

[da ThRONe]

I think the question here is why isnt Reebok the only maker of NFL jerseys and EA the only game maker of the NFL not have some kinda deal. And that deal should also make its way down to NCAA for the few teams that have there deal with Reebok.