Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

[ReservoirDog76]

Quote: Originally Posted by Blueblood53

Dude stop acting like you know everything. I'd like to know how these rosters are funny, and I'd also like to know why you have to be a prick, when everybody is concerned about these rosters, but oh know not the mighty ReservoirDog, he knows everything.

When did I say the rosters are funny? I don't know everything, but I do know EA's track record, which everyone else seems to be neglecting. But get pissed at me go 'head I don't care.

[Luca Brasi]

Wow Colorado's rosters are a complete mess. No freshmen,terrible ratings,no depth at certain positions. Yikes. Oh well,i guess i'll be busy editing...

[Palo20]

A simple answer to this would really help.

[Lava]

I'm pretty sure these rosters are final guys. There's absolutely no reason an EA rep (OMT, Russ, whoever) wouldn't squash this rumor as soon as it came out if it weren't true. This is nothing but negative press for the game, and it's not like it'd be some big secret that these weren't the rosters, as accurate rosters are an expectation. It's not like a feature rumor, where they would hesitate to confirm/deny it for fear of leaking info.

It would have been squashed, if it were false, as the longer this is out there without comment from EA the more people who start to believe it, and that could have quite an effect on sales.

Just my two cents.

[prowler]

Quote: Originally Posted by ReservoirDog76

When did I say the rosters are funny? I don't know everything, but I do know EA's track record, which everyone else seems to be neglecting. But get pissed at me go 'head I don't care.

Obviously you don't know EA's track record. When was the last time they released a game with rosters this incomplete? If anything their roster track record is a cause for optimism.

[Herky]

Quote: Originally Posted by prowler

Obviously you don't know EA's track record. When was the last time they released a game with rosters this incomplete? If anything their roster track record is a cause for optimism.

Bingo. EA has been very good about getting the roster right in the past. They've never had a mess like this before that I can remember.

Rosters were the last thing people ever complained about out of the box.

[GigemAGGIES13]

These rosters are quite a conundrum. I don't know what to think.

QB/WR Ryan Tannehill for Texas A&M set the school's freshman receiving records last season, however he is projected to be the backup QB this upcoming year due to lack-of-depth. His ratings reflect the new situation with decent QB attributes and solid receiving numbers.

Then there are players, according to height and weight, that don't exist. I wonder how the roster naming guys are going to react if these are in the final product. Last year Pasta got some kind of hook up...we shall see.

[Blueblood53]

Quote: Originally Posted by ReservoirDog76

When did I say the rosters are funny? I don't know everything, but I do know EA's track record, which everyone else seems to be neglecting. But get pissed at me go 'head I don't care.

I'm not mad at you, you were just acting like it was funny when everyone was mad at these rosters.

Everyone here had valid points as to why these might not be the final rosters, but yet you neglected those ideas and posted .

So, lets just drop it and see if the rosters are final or not.