LOL: The BCS is screwed up in the game also

[Ruffy]

Quote: Originally Posted by fistofrage

There is no tie-breaker in the B10. You are co-champions. The BCS Championship can take whomever they want based on their criteria.

[oGFeRNie]

If its in the game..Its in the GAME !!

[CKW11]

Quote: Originally Posted by jlfarris

What was FSU ranked when you lost to them? BTW, if the BCS is screwy here, then to me that's more realism for the screwed up system.

FSU had to have been 20th cause im pretty sure thats what they start off at and they are each others first game.

[edreedpicksix]

sounds like they dont want another lopsided big 10 sec championship game

[sfc415]

LOL it happens in real life also just part of how wacky the polls work

[jeeve]

Rankings are still out of whack.

I went 12-1 with Texas A&M with a beefed-up schedule, my only loss being in the regular season to ranked OK State... I finished ranked #7.

Meanwhile, Virginia Tech went 10-3 with an at-best marginally tougher schedule, and finished either #2 or #3 in the country.

[JAYMO76]

Quote: Originally Posted by dickdalewood

Lol, sounds like the BCS is working perfectly in the game.

Wanting logic from an illogical formula... the BCS is a riddle wrapped in an enigma... it's not meant to be understood!

[FunkDockta27]

doesnt seem any different to me than last year when Oklahoma lost to Texas, Texas lost to Tex Tech, and Oklahoma beat Tex Tech...Oklahoma goes to get kicked in the nads by Florida...doesnt seem to me too unbelievable that PSU coulda got by your Wolverines esp if their non-conference sched was tougher? (idk i havent finished the entire thread yet to see if you said if that was the case)