More Links

rdfowler · 06-13-2010, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sting


	I'm glad Clemson is in. I was hoping for them or UNC.

I wanted Georgia Tech in.... i mean i just thought that was a big offense style that they left out

tteeebooooow · 06-13-2010, 11:16 AM

i would say the match ups were to show off the offense styles but teams like texas tech and georgia tech would be in the match ups. it makes more sense that the match ups are advertisements for the pro combat jerseys seeing as every team in the demo has one and tim tebow is wearing a pro combat jersey on the cover of the game and apparently with all these posts about the pro combat jerseys the advertising is working.

Okstatepokes · 06-13-2010, 12:07 PM

They want to show off Clemson's pre-game intro where they touch Howard's rock.......as well as Clemson and Mizzou's pro combat unis.

BadAssHskr · 06-13-2010, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patriotsk1d


	120 ways to win.

missouri doesn't win anything ever. for proof, no one wants them, period, in the conference realignment.

RamblinWreck21 · 06-13-2010, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdfowler


	I wanted Georgia Tech in.... i mean i just thought that was a big offense style that they left out

We don't have pro combat Jerseys

canes21 · 06-13-2010, 12:58 PM

To show off two types of spread. You have Missouri who was one of the originals with the spread and runs an up tempo no huddle spread while Clemson runs a one back spread system.

acreyman · 06-13-2010, 12:59 PM

Dont forget TCU also has that wierd 5 DB's defense on the field all the time.

So I guess its Fresno and Nevada as the best teams in the WAC now? Ehck! I say add the best teams left over from the Big 12 and WAC, say Fresno, Nevada, Kansas State, and Mizz, to the the Mountain West and have a two division conference kinda like the PAC-16.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gofresno


	I'm surprised TCU didnt get in. I think they have the most popular pro combat unis, plus have a neat offensive scheme. It would have been nice to get a non-bcs team in there as well

jfsolo · 06-13-2010, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadAssHskr


	missouri doesn't win anything ever. for proof, no one wants them, period, in the conference realignment.

Stay Classy my man, we're better than that.

06-13-2010, 11:16 AM	#10
tteeebooooow Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: May 2009 Blog Entries: 4	Re: Why exactly are Clemson and Mizzou gonna be in this years demo and not other team i would say the match ups were to show off the offense styles but teams like texas tech and georgia tech would be in the match ups. it makes more sense that the match ups are advertisements for the pro combat jerseys seeing as every team in the demo has one and tim tebow is wearing a pro combat jersey on the cover of the game and apparently with all these posts about the pro combat jerseys the advertising is working.

06-13-2010, 12:07 PM	#11
Okstatepokes Banned OVR: 3 Join Date: May 2009 Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma	Re: Why exactly are Clemson and Mizzou gonna be in this years demo and not other team They want to show off Clemson's pre-game intro where they touch Howard's rock.......as well as Clemson and Mizzou's pro combat unis.

06-13-2010, 12:58 PM	#14
canes21 Hall Of Fame OVR: 41 Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Tennessee Blog Entries: 2	Re: Why exactly are Clemson and Mizzou gonna be in this years demo and not other team To show off two types of spread. You have Missouri who was one of the originals with the spread and runs an up tempo no huddle spread while Clemson runs a one back spread system. __________________ “No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.” ― Plato

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

More Links

Why exactly are Clemson and Mizzou gonna be in this years demo and not other teams?