The official 2011 progression thread

[dan_457]

Quote: Originally Posted by White Out

great news from year 2... Year 2010 2011 2012 99 0 9 4 98 1 8 3 95 -97 40 32 34 91-94 70+ 70+ 87-90 70+ 70+ a drop off! wonderful to see. the next question for me... how many players ranked in the high 80s and low 90s are there exactly? not sure if it matters cuz the progression appears to be working well so far. if there isnt a cluster **** of 99's and 98's... we should be good. lets see how 2013 shapes up

The progression this year doesn't worry to much, i believe the only 99 ovr guys you're bound to see are the guys who were previously rated in the high mid to high 90's out of the box. What I'm curios to see is the number of the high 90's players at around year 6, because those are all CPU generated recruits. If you can sim that far, that'd be awesome.

[White Out]

ill include some high ranked freshman next season. i dont want another drop off necessarily, just the numbers NOT to balloon like last yera. so far? so good

[coachchris]

Good stuff. I am also interested in how the recruits are progressing, hopefully things still look good in 2015 - 2016

[White Out]

very interesting results....

Year	2010	2011	2012	2013
99	0	9	4	1
98	1	8	3	1
95 -97	40	32	34	9
91-94		70+	70+	37
87-90		70+	70+	70+

it looks like its trending to a lower rated future...

Freshmen:
HB 87
RT 86
C 86
QB 86
p 85
p 85 again..
k 84
wr 84
WR 83
there are your top 10 freshmen.
For overall school ratings:

Year	2010	2013
A	12	1
B	55	23
C	35	49

those numbers are very very very rough, but show a clear trend of teams gravitating towards C, with some schools getting b's and b +'s.. and very few schools trending to the A's. Lets see what a couple more yeras do to to this

[NDNathan]

Looks like great news. How many truly elite teams are there each year? Not many. Most teams fall into the C range where any team can be any other on any particular day.

Hopefully the recruiting is difficult enough so that the user team is not always in the A range as well.

[ACardAttack]

I like what Im seeing!

[Michgantown]

Quote: Originally Posted by White Out

very interesting results.... Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 99 0 9 4 1 98 1 8 3 1 95 -97 40 32 34 9 91-94 70+ 70+ 37 87-90 70+ 70+ 70+ it looks like its trending to a lower rated future... Freshmen: HB 87 RT 86 C 86 QB 86 p 85 p 85 again.. k 84 wr 84 WR 83 there are your top 10 freshmen. For overall school ratings: Year 2010 2013 A 12 1 B 55 23 C 35 49 those numbers are very very very rough, but show a clear trend of teams gravitating towards C, with some schools getting b's and b +'s.. and very few schools trending to the A's. Lets see what a couple more yeras do to to this

can you also check if teams are recruiting like they would in real life Like GT having a 75 spd or higher QB

[DJACK]

NICE! I love the overall of the players in 2013 it should be like that from the start. The freshman overalls still look a little high but 3 of them are K/P so i guess its not too bad