The official 2011 progression thread

[Michgantown]

What are some team Offense defense and special teams rating i hope SPT is not bring the ovl rating down to make it seem like there are no As

Also you have to take into account the roster makers on the site.

You might see different results when makers go through teams and change attributes. You might see teams in the D range instead of all in the C range

[angels28]

Quote: Originally Posted by dan_457

I just felt sinking feeling in my chest... I knew this was going to happen, People complained about progression too much, and now EA overcompensated by nerfing player progression and incoming recruits, creating a homogenized mess of B and C teams, ugh. Maybe this is just my opinion, but this just kills dynasty for me, at least anything over 3-4 years. Maybe this is an overreaction, but my enthusiasm for this game cut has just been cut in half.

Some people are never satisfied. Then I noticed a Cleveland FAN. Then I understood. Sorry about Lebron, I will love him in Miami

[Pass_The_Cows]

This thread has increased my hype for this game exponentially. It's actually going to be special to have a 94+ guy!

[dan_457]

lol, i see I'm definitely the minority here, that's cool i guess, at least you guys are happy with it.

See my issue is that progression and recruit ratings were never the problem, it's the jacked up default ratings players had, and rather than fixing that by creating reasonable ratings out of the box, they compensated by lower everything else, to take away the impact of their overrated default players. Oh well, I'm just venting here guys.

[White Out]

Year	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
99	0	9	4	1	0	2
98	1	8	3	1	0	1
95 -97	40	32	34	9	6	13
91-94		70+	70+	37	47	50
87-90		70+	70+	70+	70+	70+

ok so 2 9's... 1 98, double the 95-97s... same 91-94's and the 87 to 90 is strong as usual. this was very nice to see.

Year	2010	2013	2014	2015
A	12	1	0	0
B	55	23	22	19
C	35	49	56	44

Another year with no a rated team. this i find a bit disappointing but... i can live with it.

1 more year and I'm going to call it quits for this... overall... am I happy? Yeah I guess. Compared to last year. Would I make a change? Not if it was up to EA frankly. One previous poster is right, they did over compensate... but not to the point where it makes the game and dynasty broken. its all relative, which we didnt have last year. if there was 50 99 rated players, and a bunch of A rated teams... everyone is
amazing. with this... the new A is B+. there is parity, but NOT extreme parity like last year.

Quote:

See my issue is that progression and recruit ratings were never the problem, it's the jacked up default ratings players had, and rather than fixing that by creating reasonable ratings out of the box, they compensated by lower everything else, to take away the impact of their overrated default players. Oh well, I'm just venting here guys.

that's not correct. the 2016 rosters and beyond had ridiculous levels of teams and players rated too high.

[Michgantown]

before you call it quits can you make sure teams are recruiting right

[dan_457]

Quote: Originally Posted by angels28

Some people are never satisfied. Then I noticed a Cleveland FAN. Then I understood. Sorry about Lebron, I will love him in Miami

Seriously!? Let me guess, you've just been waiting to try and troll a Cleveland fan haven't you.

Honestly this is the only downside I've seen so far for NCAA 11, but i like i said it just my opinion, so for many it's an upside, and it's great that you guys are happy, but i just wish we had more control over this.