If anyone wants to see a tiny clip of gameplay

[GameplayDevUFC]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yaari

Wonderboy's stance looks pretty difficult for a game, is that possible at all?

His might be the best one in the game.

[Trillz]

Quote: Originally Posted by GameplayDevUFC

His might be the best one in the game.

do styles affect how certain strikes land or is it just a stance that looks different but everyone has a default frame (if that makes sense).

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by TGOne

So by principle knowing EA is a multi-billion dollar company, larger than any of it competition with far more experience which publishes this game doesn't grant them by probability of more resources and assets/budget? Is this your logic LMAO?!? So you basically believe by inconsistantly visiting EA in the last 2 years where each visit sums up to 2 days of game testing and free pizza and having some direct and indirect conversations with the devs somehow grant you some sort of decisive insights behind the curtain regarding their projects? Especially their numbers? Hell even MartialMind, in his his latest video asserted that most of the things coming out in the trailer was unheard of and a surprise to him. So what makes you think that you know all the details here? Especially their project numbers? Most importantly, what makes you think that every bit of info through direct/indirect conversations with the devs somehow are factual or based on reality/truth? You actually think the devs or EA as publisher are incapable of lying in order to sell their product considering how gaming industry has went these days? You actually think EA are fair with their consumers despite the fact that they have been voted as the worst publisher on several occasions and the worst company in America which i already mentioned? Now all this quite frankly sums up what kind of naive person you really are LOL. It's like regulary visiting an electronic store and having conversations with the salesman and believing every bit of info regarding the company and the product his trying to sell you. Or accepting everything that has been told by an investigative journalist about specific events, or every bit of gibberish an politician trying to spew out regarding an national project. Dude you need to come back to reality and the only thing here that resembles stupidity is your post i'm afraid. So you're basically saying the past two iterations of EA UFC games wasn't an glitchfest? Are you serious?!? It also doesn't change the fact that WWE games are better and more fun games than EA UFC with faaar more content from movesets, creation suite, mode wise and gamplay wise. The first two iterations of THQ UFC games was still better than EAs first two, if we are looking from an complete standpoint by even the majority, so i'm not quite sure what your on about? Not to mention they had far less resources, manpower and that these games are nearly a decade old with restricted tech. Look dude, iv'e never searched for your approval and acceptance in the first place at all? "Feel free to complain"? Yeah that's what i and others have been doing all along in case you haven't noticed because we "feel free" just that about the clinch and grappling so i don't need your lecture about my position and rights regarding criticism. The irony is every bit of criticism that is thrown by myself or others, you're first in line to debunk it like we are attacking your family business or something? So much for not protecting their position. I'm telling you, you are free to agree with me or not. You're also free to believe EA is an fair company and everything you've been told to by the devs...I could care less. I've also never insisted that they should use less mo-cap in regards to the striking and don't feel the necessity to repeat myself to you...Pay attention next time. Well neither do you! Are you a EA employee? No? Well then you have no clue on what's going on behind the curtain aswell. It seems in some context that you really are an employee of EA the way you react to every criticism. Take it easy, you are the one that exaggerates here.

I'll keep this as quick as I can because most of what you wrote is nonsense. Its simple:

- I have spoken to a dev team member almost every day for the past 2 yrs about the game. I have spent over 100 hours at EA headquarters discussing and playing the game. Whats funny is I spent almost half of the time I was at EA in August not playing the game but sitting with a dev discussing the AI or testing the things that we made changes to. Do I know everything about the game? Hell no. I actually dont care to know everything. But I know much more than the average person and much more than you. You have trouble accepting that and thats OK but no matter what thats true.

- I dont need to protect my position. In fact, I've gotten in more trouble by saying things positive about the game that werent ready to be announced than anything. The role I play on the team isnt really taken by anyone else but if EA wanted to replace me, I had a great 2 yrs and would move on.

- What I dont like is when people are wrong and are adamant that they arent when the evidence is right in front of you. You made a dumb statement. You act as if you know EA UFC's budget. You dont. You have no clue. That's OK.

A proper response to my original question wouldve been "I dont know their budget but I feel like their resources shouldve been used for more grappling". Now I disagree with that but that statement is completely fair. Instead you got all defensive and try to attack me and other GCs. Thats fine though. I'll continue to do what I do and call people out who make dumb statements without any knowledge and I guess you'll continue to make those statements.

[TheJamesKraus]

I love the new vulnerability thing, my worry is that alot of players will complain if they are on the receiving end of it thus leading to it being nerfed/removed in the future.

[Trillz]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheJamesKraus

I love the new vulnerability thing, my worry is that alot of players will complain if they are on the receiving end of it thus leading to it being nerfed/removed in the future.

As long as its realistic i dont think people will complain, but im sure people will be dominating fights then get clipped then started complaining about the system but that can happen in real life.

[GameplayDevUFC]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheJamesKraus

I love the new vulnerability thing, my worry is that alot of players will complain if they are on the receiving end of it thus leading to it being nerfed/removed in the future.

Yeah I'm interested to see what the reaction is.

The good thing is when you get hurt you know exactly why and what you did wrong.

I find this helps people accept it a lot more than random events out of your control.

[Yaari]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheJamesKraus

I love the new vulnerability thing, my worry is that alot of players will complain if they are on the receiving end of it thus leading to it being nerfed/removed in the future.

Good thing about that is that they only need to watch the replay to see the knockout was justified.

[HereticGabriel]

GPD, with the new control scheme for striking, is it possible to fight like GSP last night? Well, what I mean is, currently GSP has both lead and rear supermans, but he was throwing some overhands as well. Laat game both were tied to the same modifier. Is it possible to have a superman and overhand in UFC 3?