MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Thanks for the feedback on James Shields.
A couple of votes against a trade to Toronto. I guess I'll look past them.
No real problems with a deal to the Cubs (although on second look, I don't like the Cubs all that much as a destination for Shields...doesn't seem to fit them all that great simply for an upgrade on Hammel).
One opinion that I would have to eat some salary to trade to Houston. One opinion that I wouldn't. I may do something like take $$ back in the form of Scott Feldman's expiring deal to split the difference. Then Houston would be paying about 85% of Shields' money and I would be off the hook for everything after this season. I will let you guys know what I come up with.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
The second player on my trade agenda is Andrew Cashner.
Contract Info: Rental at $7.1MM for this season, then FA eligible for the first time in 2017.
Vitals: 29 y/o, 81 OVR, B POT [69 H/9 | 60 K/9 | 69 BB/9 | 66 HR/9 | 84 STAM] (about +1-2 points of across the board performance-based progresion so far this season have already been taken into account in these ratings)
Triple Crown Stats: 3-6, 3.15 ERA
Volume Stats: 111.1 IP, 100 K, 49 BB, 12 HR, 17 GS, 12 QS
Rate Stats (career norms): 8.08 K/9 (7.60) | 3.96 BB/9 (3.11) | 0.97 HR/9 (0.82), 1.27 WHIP (1.27)
Nutshell Stats: 1.53 WAR (2.7 WAR pace), 3.96 FIP (3.56 career FIP)
Potentially Interested Teams: Toronto (56-36, 1st place), Kansas City (52-38, 1st place), Houston (53-38, t-1st), Boston (51-39, 2nd place).
The teams that make the most sense here, assuming that I send Shields to Houston, are the Blue Jays (really, their rotation is in shambles) and the Royals. The Cubs could use a starter, but a reunion with Cashner is about as realistic as Shields going back to KC.
What I hope to accomplish here: Cashner's salary isn't the main issue here as it was for Shields. Along with Cashner being healthy and chugging along with respectable, near career-avg stats for him, I could see him getting a decent return for a rental.
I'm looking for any intriguing prospect here that fits a longer term plan. Not necessarily an 18-year-old, but open to most anything. But, bonus points for someone who I can use right away in the bigs. Dealing Pomeranz, Shields, and Cashner will have me throwing the kitchen sink at trying to fill out the rotation for the rest of the year.
Prospects I have interest in (in this price range)...not married to these exact guys:
TOR
Spoiler
RHP Sean Reid-Foley (66 OVR/C POT)
RHP John Stilson (68 OVR/C POT)
OF D.J. Davis (58 OVR/C POT)
C Max Pentecost (54 OVR/C POT)
RHP Drew Hutchison (77 OVR/C POT)
BOS
Spoiler
1B Sam Travis (68 OVR/C POT)
LHP Henry Owens (74 OVR/B POT)
C Blake Swihart, lol (73 OVR/B POT)
2B Sean Coyle (70 OVR/C POT)
SS Deven Marrero (74 OVR/C POT)
LHP Brian Johnson (72 OVR/C POT)
RHP Matt Barnes (70 OVR/C POT)
3B Jantzen Witte (67 OVR/C POT)
KC
Spoiler
RHP Josh Staumont (60 OVR/C POT)
1B Ryan O'Hearn (54 OVR/C POT)
CF Bubba Starling (67 OVR/C POT)
LHP Matthew Strahm (73 OVR/C POT)
1B Balbino Fuenmayor (69 OVR/C POT)
HOU
Spoiler
RHP Joe Musgrove (77 OVR/78 POT)
RHP Kyle Smith (72 OVR/73 POT)
RHP Chris Devenski (72 OVR/73 POT)
RHP Michael Feliz (72 OVR/77 POT)
RHP Jandel Gustave (63 OVR/74 POT)
3B J.D. Davis (59 OVR/74 POT)
I am mainly looking for feedback on (1) how much value is fair for a rental Cashner with decent stats? (2) which team/prospect(s) looks like the best fit?Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 07-24-2016, 04:22 PM.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Blue Jays deal one of the pitchers (how old are the guys with the 60's OVR and what's their skill profile like...I never like judging on OVR in sports games) and OF Davis maybe?
Especially if the POT might be "high" C (like 77 or something) on those 60's guys. That combined with a profile that would develop the most important ratings could lead to an interesting pitcher playing "over his head" that could help you out in return for someone getting it done now."Some people call it butterflies, but to him, it probably feels like pterodactyls in his stomach." --Plesac in MLB18Comment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Blue Jays deal one of the pitchers (how old are the guys with the 60's OVR and what's their skill profile like...I never like judging on OVR in sports games) and OF Davis maybe?
Especially if the POT might be "high" C (like 77 or something) on those 60's guys. That combined with a profile that would develop the most important ratings could lead to an interesting pitcher playing "over his head" that could help you out in return for someone getting it done now.
More info on John Stilson: 25 y/o, 68 OVR, 74 POT, 34 STAM (is RP), 68 H/9, 58 HR/9, 69 K/9, 57 BB/9, 97 Velo, 83 Break, 50 Control. [He's not a prospect at this stage.]
I think D.J. Davis + John Stilson would be a pretty good deal for the Jays. As for me, I'd get a lottery ticket (Davis) and a guy who could figure into the bullpen mix going forward (Stilson). I certainly wouldn't feel guilty about this deal; if anything I may be selling Cashner a bit short given the scarcity of decent starting pitching on the trade market. I could see a 1-for-1 involving Reid-Foley, but AC noted that he didn't think Reid-Foley would be dealt. AC = Blue Jays fan so it's a weighty opinion.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
More info on Sean Reid-Foley: 20 y/o, 66 OVR, 77 POT, 80 STAM, 68 H/9, 55 HR/9, 53 K/9, 36 BB/9, 76 Velo, 70 Break, 42 Control. [Reid-Foley is the Blue Jays' 3rd best prospect according to MLB dot com/5th best according to BA so he may be a bit much.]
More info on John Stilson: 25 y/o, 68 OVR, 74 POT, 34 STAM (is RP), 68 H/9, 58 HR/9, 69 K/9, 57 BB/9, 97 Velo, 83 Break, 50 Control. [He's not a prospect at this stage.]
I think D.J. Davis + John Stilson would be a pretty good deal for the Jays. As for me, I'd get a lottery ticket (Davis) and a guy who could figure into the bullpen mix going forward (Stilson). I certainly wouldn't feel guilty about this deal; if anything I may be selling Cashner a bit short given the scarcity of decent starting pitching on the trade market. I could see a 1-for-1 involving Reid-Foley, but AC noted that he didn't think Reid-Foley would be dealt. AC = Blue Jays fan so it's a weighty opinion.
From just the game perspective, I think Foley + Davis would be good. Foley could be good, but he could be also be too wild to make the most of his potentially solid H/9 rating (pitches miss location too often), and that's counting on most of his "OVR increasing points" going to /9 and not to things like fielding or clutch and hopefully not HR/9, since that doesn't matter (in live play). He reminds me of a guy who induces softer contact and IFFB...if he locates...which he might not consistently enough to use those skills.
I know I'm basically the only one here who thinks of prospects and their development like that so Foley might not be in the cards. So looking at the Stilson + Davis option, maybe throw on Pentecost or a more raw-but-younger version of Foley? You get the same skill profile in general, but take a little more risk with less foundational development?"Some people call it butterflies, but to him, it probably feels like pterodactyls in his stomach." --Plesac in MLB18Comment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Chapman to Cubs for Torres+ being finalized. Sticking point is a Chapman extension.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using TapatalkComment
-
"Some people call it butterflies, but to him, it probably feels like pterodactyls in his stomach." --Plesac in MLB18Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
What's your opinion on the extension. I saw Keith Law debating a guy and he was of the opinion you aren't trading for the extension just this year. I'm inclined to disagree with that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
I agree with Law on this. Yankees are trading away 2016 Chapman. I'll only agree if the extension is on a discount as in less than $15 million per year. If it's 15 or higher it's fair market and they could have just paid it in December and kept TorresComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
The rumored extension is 4yrs/$60 million.Comment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
I think D.J. Davis + John Stilson would be a pretty good deal for the Jays. As for me, I'd get a lottery ticket (Davis) and a guy who could figure into the bullpen mix going forward (Stilson). I certainly wouldn't feel guilty about this deal; if anything I may be selling Cashner a bit short given the scarcity of decent starting pitching on the trade market. I could see a 1-for-1 involving Reid-Foley, but AC noted that he didn't think Reid-Foley would be dealt. AC = Blue Jays fan so it's a weighty opinion.Check out my dynasty: Rise to the Top: The Coaching Career of Joshua Morgan (NCAA 14)Comment
Comment