2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #10366
    Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by G3no_11
    I guess... but why would the Blue Jays do that? Trade a very good player (ace?) for a struggling/over-paid pitcher? Verlander still has a lot of upside at age 30 and with him struggling the Tigers could sign him for a decent price next off-season.
    It's a do-able trade but I don't see why it would happen. I think it would be more realistic if you waited until early-mid season to make the trade instead of the Tigers giving up on a former MVP that's only 30-31 years old... just my opinion.
    31 on opening day.

    We'd do it as taking a chance on someone's potential, like we love to do, all the freaking time.
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • Totte
      MVP
      • Mar 2005
      • 2919

      #10367
      Originally posted by ACMilan99
      31 on opening day.

      We'd do it as taking a chance on someone's potential, like we love to do, all the freaking time.
      31 years old and a lot of mileage on his arm by that point. Agree that Dombrowski would be selling for that package.

      And yes, the Crow deal seems to be working out nicely as well. They do love them some Crow out there in Kansas though so make sure it's quality that fits a need going back in return
      Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

      Comment

      • G3no_11
        MVP
        • Oct 2012
        • 1110

        #10368
        Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by ACMilan99
        31 on opening day.

        We'd do it as taking a chance on someone's potential, like we love to do, all the freaking time.
        31's right in his prime. I feel like the Tigers would give Verlander a shot for the first half of the season... he could break out and have another MVP season and with them in contention anyway there's no reason to force a trade to get rid of someone that's shown signs of being the best in the league.
        It's a fair trade... I just don't see the Tigers doing that. They could wait for a few months into the season and see if he turns things around for a possible World Series run, or to get more value out of him.
        Even if Verlander had a poor season, I would bet they would still re-sign him just because they could do it for a good price.

        Bottom line for me is: they are trading a former MVP, in his prime, at his lowest value... it just doesn't seem like a move they would pull in the off-season.
        Denver Broncos
        Colorado Rockies
        Denver Nuggets

        Comment

        • AC
          Win the East
          • Sep 2010
          • 14951

          #10369
          Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by Totte
          31 years old and a lot of mileage on his arm by that point. Agree that Dombrowski would be selling for that package.

          And yes, the Crow deal seems to be working out nicely as well. They do love them some Crow out there in Kansas though so make sure it's quality that fits a need going back in return
          I have a soft spot for KC, I'll give 'em something nice.

          Originally posted by G3no_11
          31's right in his prime. I feel like the Tigers would give Verlander a shot for the first half of the season... he could break out and have another MVP season and with them in contention anyway there's no reason to force a trade to get rid of someone that's shown signs of being the best in the league.
          It's a fair trade... I just don't see the Tigers doing that. They could wait for a few months into the season and see if he turns things around for a possible World Series run, or to get more value out of him.
          Even if Verlander had a poor season, I would bet they would still re-sign him just because they could do it for a good price.

          Bottom line for me is: they are trading a former MVP, in his prime, at his lowest value... it just doesn't seem like a move they would pull in the off-season.
          Colby Rasmus also showed signs of being the best in the league... point is he had one good season. He'd be an FA after the year and they'd want to max his value.

          The former MVP thing is EXTREMELY SUBJECTIVE (Bitter about JB not winning ).
          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

          Comment

          • survo
            Banned
            • Nov 2012
            • 1

            #10370
            Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            I'm new to this whole thing. I just created my account and I've been a fan of the rosters for the whole season. I'm courious to as you discuss realistic or fair? I go towards more fare and I've heard rumors the Rangers are trying to get Felix Hernandez.

            Felix Hernandez
            for
            Andrus/ Profar
            Moreland
            2 mid level prospects.

            What all do you think I would have to include to make this fair?

            Comment

            • AC
              Win the East
              • Sep 2010
              • 14951

              #10371
              Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by survo
              I'm new to this whole thing. I just created my account and I've been a fan of the rosters for the whole season. I'm courious to as you discuss realistic or fair? I go towards more fare and I've heard rumors the Rangers are trying to get Felix Hernandez.

              Felix Hernandez
              for
              Andrus/ Profar
              Moreland
              2 mid level prospects.

              What all do you think I would have to include to make this fair?
              Felix Hernandez will not be traded. Jack Z has literally said, on quote, "I may have to carry around a tape recorder that will play, 'Felix Hernandez isn't available.'"

              If you want to be unrealistic, then....

              Olt, Andrus, A SP prospect, Hamilton, Holland
              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

              Comment

              • CameRoN0407
                It's a New England Thing
                • Oct 2012
                • 3328

                #10372
                Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by ACMilan99
                Felix Hernandez will not be traded. Jack Z has literally said, on quote, "I may have to carry around a tape recorder that will play, 'Felix Hernandez isn't available.'"

                If you want to be unrealistic, then....

                Olt, Andrus, A SP prospect, Hamilton, Holland
                Sad, what a waste of talent...
                Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
                Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

                Team USA
                Red Sox
                Patriots
                Celtics
                Bruins

                Comment

                • fanofikedavis
                  Rookie
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 270

                  #10373
                  Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  What do you guys feel is a fair deal for Dickey.

                  In my franchise, Texas has really had some bad starting pitching, so I signed Dickey to a deal in the off season (So it's like his option year IRL) and I'm between these two deals.

                  Texas Gets:

                  R.A Dickey

                  Mets Receive:

                  Mike Olt
                  Martin Perez

                  OR--------------------------------------------------------

                  Texas Receives:

                  R.A Dickey
                  Reese Havens

                  Mets Receive:

                  Martin Perez
                  Elvis Andrus

                  I wanted to add Havens to the second deal because I feel Andrus has more trade value in that he's had major league success and is still developing. Havens has had a lot of injury problems but could still be a solid player, if he ever makes it. I also want Andrus because a middle infield of Ruben Tejada/Elvis Andrus could be very productive for my Mets.

                  I retained Wright, so I feel that Mike Olt wouldn't be as valuable in that he'd have to play the outfield, which obviously isn't his natural position, but he could still be very good wiht the bat.

                  Dickey is making 3 years, 31 million by the way. His stats in my franchise were:

                  18-7, 2.88 ERA, 212 K's, 1.079 WHIP

                  Comment

                  • AC
                    Win the East
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 14951

                    #10374
                    Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Texas won't trade Olt, Andrus, or Profar. You *could* go for an A prospect (straight up), but not more than 1 A and 1 C.
                    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                    Comment

                    • mpbaseball22
                      MVP
                      • May 2011
                      • 1029

                      #10375
                      Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by ACMilan99
                      Texas won't trade Olt, Andrus, or Profar. You *could* go for an A prospect (straight up), but not more than 1 A and 1 C.
                      Texas wont trade Profar, but I could see them trading Olt and Andrus pretty easily

                      Comment

                      • AC
                        Win the East
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 14951

                        #10376
                        Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by mpbaseball22
                        Texas wont trade Profar, but I could see them trading Olt and Andrus pretty easily
                        They weren't even willing to trade Olt for Dempster, and Texas has actually tried to acquire Andrelton Simmonds and flip him for Justin Upton rather than trade Andrus.
                        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                        Comment

                        • mpbaseball22
                          MVP
                          • May 2011
                          • 1029

                          #10377
                          Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by ACMilan99
                          They weren't even willing to trade Olt for Dempster, and Texas has actually tried to acquire Andrelton Simmonds and flip him for Justin Upton rather than trade Andrus.
                          Where'd you hear that? I heard they were actually considering trading Andrus because of there IF being too crowded. And then I heard they were going to move Kinsler to OF. I really wouldn't say Olt and Andrus are untradeable, just really hard to get

                          Comment

                          • Scott
                            Your Go-to TV Expert
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 20032

                            #10378
                            Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by mpbaseball22
                            Where'd you hear that? I heard they were actually considering trading Andrus because of there IF being too crowded. And then I heard they were going to move Kinsler to OF. I really wouldn't say Olt and Andrus are untradeable, just really hard to get
                            MLBTradeRumors.
                            PSN-Shugarooo
                            Steam-ScottM.816
                            Twitch.tv/Shugarooo
                            Want to follow my Franchises? Join my discord: https://discord.gg/nHbNCWmmGs

                            Comment

                            • AC
                              Win the East
                              • Sep 2010
                              • 14951

                              #10379
                              Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by mpbaseball22
                              Where'd you hear that? I heard they were actually considering trading Andrus because of there IF being too crowded. And then I heard they were going to move Kinsler to OF. I really wouldn't say Olt and Andrus are untradeable, just really hard to get
                              If they won't trade Andrus/Profar for UPTON, they're not trading him for Dickey.

                              Loath is a pretty strong word.

                              This is old but pretty clear.
                              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #10380
                                Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by Scott
                                MLBTradeRumors.
                                I'd be listening to the resident Rangers fan of OS on this.
                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...