2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Force trades can be looked at both ways depending on the type of trader u are....One can easily trade Skip Schumaker for Garza and not find it distastefulSteelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | LiverpoolComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
But people who post here for approval shouldn't be found 'distasteful' for using force trades... I use force trades and get OS' approval because OS is smarter than MLB 12's trade AI"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
shall we revisit the past with some of the trades that have been presented to us?....gotta look at both sides of the coin here is all im sayinSteelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | LiverpoolComment
-
Would 2 mid-B's be good enough to get Mark Trumbo???
Does it really matter where I sent this from???Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Meh, most people here are either smart or highly advanced in terms of baseball knowledge."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
a monkey is more advanced then The Show's trade logicSteelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | LiverpoolComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
What about:
Angels get:
Max Scherzer
Victor Martinez
Danny Perales
Blue Jays get:
Mark TrumboComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Just because you bring Scherzer and V-Mart up so freaking often (without taking into consideration that V-Mart is less than useless to LAA), I'm saying no. There's obviously something wrong with them that you're leaving out."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
Comment