2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #4006
    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by hradekbr
    Smoral maybe
    I know you like Smoral but..

    Originally posted by Bluejaysfan65
    Isn't Matt Smoral for Dan Straily straight up a little bit too little to give?
    Yes.

    Stroman + Pillar? Lugo + Smoral?
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • Bluejaysfan65
      MVP
      • Jun 2011
      • 4784

      #4007
      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by ACMilan99
      I know you like Smoral but..



      Yes.

      Stroman + Pillar? Lugo + Smoral?
      Lugo and Smoral for Dan Straily seems ok...
      A New Era | Toronto Blue Jays (MLB The Show)
      The Time Is Now | Toronto Maple Leafs (NHL 20)
      We The North | Toronto Raptors (NBA 2K20)

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #4008
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by Bluejaysfan65
        Lugo and Smoral for Dan Straily seems ok...
        It's on the more conservative side of fairness, but it's not world ending.
        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • Bluejaysfan65
          MVP
          • Jun 2011
          • 4784

          #4009
          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by ACMilan99
          It's on the more conservative side of fairness, but it's not world ending.
          Would it be more fair if I added someone like Adam Loewen or Andy LaRoche?
          A New Era | Toronto Blue Jays (MLB The Show)
          The Time Is Now | Toronto Maple Leafs (NHL 20)
          We The North | Toronto Raptors (NBA 2K20)

          Comment

          • AC
            Win the East
            • Sep 2010
            • 14951

            #4010
            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by Bluejaysfan65
            Would it be more fair if I added someone like Adam Loewen or Andy LaRoche?
            Before this goes any further, no, these guys have literally no value.
            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

            Comment

            • Totte
              MVP
              • Mar 2005
              • 2919

              #4011
              Originally posted by bartone33
              I'm a few days away from the trade deadline in my Yankees franchise and am looking to trade Kevin Youkilis. I don't really have any use for him besides pinch hitting every now and then. I would like to bring in a young relief pitcher or two if possible. Any suggestions on who I should try and get?
              To the Pirates for Jeff Locke?

              Basically you can send him to any contender in need of a 1B/3B/DH
              Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

              Comment

              • TheKT
                Rookie
                • Jul 2010
                • 171

                #4012
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                How much would Avery and/or Hoes (both 23 B pot) of Baltimore cost me? I looked on the spreadsheet but couldn't find either of them, guess they're not on the 40 man roster. What is a postition of need for the Orioles?
                Last edited by TheKT; 05-10-2013, 06:03 PM.

                Comment

                • LifeOfAHooper27792
                  Rookie
                  • Apr 2013
                  • 162

                  #4013
                  Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by TheKT
                  How much would Avery and/or Hoes (both 23 B pot) of Baltimore cost me? I looked on the spreadsheet but couldn't find either of them, guess they're not on the 40 man roster. What is a postition of need for the Orioles?
                  Low B, Mid B, or High B? Look at your team's roster and find a player with at least a B in the "value 1" column on the spreadsheet. What team are you?

                  To your last question, I would say pitching.

                  The values tell you whether you can get a A, B, C, or D potential prospect.
                  Mavericks
                  Cowboys
                  Rangers
                  Stars
                  FC Dallas
                  Texas Longhorns

                  Comment

                  • TheKT
                    Rookie
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 171

                    #4014
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by LifeOfAHooper27792
                    Low B, Mid B, or High B? Look at your team's roster and find a player with at least a B in the "value 1" column on the spreadsheet. What team are you?

                    To your last question, I would say pitching.

                    The values tell you whether you can get a A, B, C, or D potential prospect.
                    I'm the Astros. So I probably won't be able to help them much in the pitching department.

                    And thanks, that makes too much sense for me to have figured out on my own. Lol

                    Comment

                    • AC
                      Win the East
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 14951

                      #4015
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Brad Glenn for Kyle Blanks.

                      Chad Jankins for Jesus Guzman.

                      Moises Sierra for Jake Arrieta.

                      Are these good?

                      Also, can someone help me decide on a spreadsheet value for Andrew Cashner?
                      Last edited by AC; 05-10-2013, 10:07 PM.
                      "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                      Comment

                      • WaitTilNextYear
                        Go Cubs Go
                        • Mar 2013
                        • 16830

                        #4016
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by ACMilan99
                        Brad Glenn for Kyle Blanks.

                        Chad Jankins for Jesus Guzman.

                        Moises Sierra for Jake Arrieta.

                        Are these good?

                        Also, can someone help me decide on a spreadsheet value for Andrew Cashner?
                        I think the 1st 2 are fine--Blanks and Guzman are slightly above "bag of balls territory." Sierra for Arrieta is an underpay imo, and the spreadsheet says Arrieta is 2 high C's, and Sierra is only 1 low C.

                        What you don't think Cashner is only 1 high C? I'd love to help with Cashner, him being a former 1st Rd pick of the Cubs. I'd use Rizzo as my base value since they were traded for each other, but obviously due to injuries and whatnot, Cashner has not progressed as much. So, I'd drop the low A, and keep high B + low B + mid C for Cashner.

                        That would put Cashner in the range of guys like Lance Lynn, Neftali Feliz, Jon Niese, Clay Buchholz, Julio Teheran, Trevor Cahill. I think that's fair.

                        but behind more established guys like Lincecum, Hellickson, Zimmermann, Garza...also fair.

                        For a guy who has no hit stuff but will likely never put it all together as a starter for any length of time and probably ends up a top closer, I think this is reasonable. I can actually see a Kerry Wood-like career path for him.

                        While discussing this, some other starters I saw that need value increases are Brett Anderson, Max Scherzer, and Jeff Samardzija. I'd say Brett Anderson and Samardzija should be worth a low A and then a bit more. Scherzer is probably 2-3 B's and a C.
                        Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 05-10-2013, 11:26 PM.
                        Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #4017
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                          I think the 1st 2 are fine--Blanks and Guzman are slightly above "bag of balls territory." Sierra for Arrieta is an underpay imo, and the spreadsheet says Arrieta is 2 high C's, and Sierra is only 1 low C.
                          Sierra is a low B, actually.

                          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                          What you don't think Cashner is only 1 high C? I'd love to help with Cashner, him being a former 1st Rd pick of the Cubs. I'd use Rizzo as my base value since they were traded for each other, but obviously due to injuries and whatnot, Cashner has not progressed as much. So, I'd drop the low A, and keep high B + low B + mid C for Cashner.
                          Well, that's what his value WAS, but he's been injury plagued as hell and hasn't pitched 50 innings yet, he's a huge injury risk and he's 27.

                          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                          That would put Cashner in the range of guys like Lance Lynn, Neftali Feliz, Jon Niese, Clay Buchholz, Julio Teheran, Trevor Cahill. I think that's fair.
                          He should be near guys like Niese or Buch, yeah, but not TEHERAN. Or Cahill. Not sure on Lynn, but Feliz is a good comp while being a bad comp at the same time.

                          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                          but behind more established guys like Lincecum, Hellickson, Zimmermann, Garza...also fair.
                          No duh he's behind th- wait, Lincecum and Hellickson? How the HELL are these guys considered established?

                          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                          For a guy who has no hit stuff but will likely never put it all together as a starter for any length of time and probably ends up a top closer, I think this is reasonable. I can actually see a Kerry Wood-like career path for him.
                          That's somewhat fair, but Woods was never AMAZING, he just struck out a lot of guys. Walks ain't good for your FIP.

                          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                          While discussing this, some other starters I saw that need value increases are Brett Anderson, Max Scherzer, and Jeff Samardzija. I'd say Brett Anderson and Samardzija should be worth a low A and then a bit more. Scherzer is probably 2-3 B's and a C.
                          I disagree on Anderson and Samardzija. Scherzer has indeed proved he's legit, though, I'm gonna go High B + Low B.

                          I'll go Mid B + low B on Cashner, fair? Similar-ish value to Niese but with the injuries factored in.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • Jcrome
                            Rookie
                            • May 2013
                            • 135

                            #4018
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Could i get Olt, Profar, Feliz for Giancarlo Stanton? maybe a B player to?

                            Comment

                            • WaitTilNextYear
                              Go Cubs Go
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 16830

                              #4019
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              @AC

                              I think mid B + low B is pretty fair for Cashner. I can agree with that. Nothing I have real issues with there. BR says he's 26 though? Turns 27 on 9/11.

                              I don't see why you like Teheran so much...he's not that good actually. He's the worst of that bunch I listed. Feliz I think is my fave comp for Cashner just based on nastiness of their stuff + velo + injuries + age + ambivalence about roles.

                              Please tell me you're joking about Lincecum not being established? Back-to-back Cy Youngs and being on the cover of a video game kinda has the affect of establishing a pitcher. Sure, he's fallen some since then..but...

                              Hellickson isn't quite there, I agree. But he was ROY.

                              I disagree VEHEMENTLY on K-Wood. He gets that rap from a lot of people who didn't really pay close attention to him (and White Sox fans). Sure I'm biased since he's my favorite pitcher ever. But, take his rookie 1998 (3.9 WAR), and then 2001-2003 (3.3, 4.3, 6.2 WAR) as a starter and he did a John Smoltz and reinvented himself as an ace closer (2008) I'd take that. Sure, the longevity isn't there because he lost lots of time to injury, but he had some incredible high points (it wasn't just 1 20 K game and a bunch of crap). Some of his H/9 and K/9 numbers were sick. And a career 3.67 ERA and 1.27 WHIP despite his command during the height of the 'roids era is impressive. Wood is not a HoFer, but he was amazing to watch (his stats don't even do it justice...his pitches were absolutely filthy), albeit frustrating too when he had his bad command. He came closer after 1945 than anyone not named Rick Sutcliffe at pitching the Cubs into the World Series, and that's a tall task.

                              EDIT: Compare Wood's BAA and Swinging Strike % to guys like Randy Johnson and Pedro Martinez. You may find it enlightening. As far as pure stuff few, if any, have matched Wood in this era.

                              Yeah, Samardzija and Anderson are both more valuable than what it says on the sheet, but as I don't plan on trading for them it doesn't affect me at all. Just know it's gonna take more than high B to get Anderson or high B + mid B to get Samardzija...much more. Nothing below a low-mid A would nab Samardzija realistically.
                              Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 05-11-2013, 12:42 AM.
                              Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                              Comment

                              • G3no_11
                                MVP
                                • Oct 2012
                                • 1110

                                #4020
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Mid B + Low B is pretty fair in my opinion. He just hasn't stayed healthy long enough to ask for more. His stuff is nasty from what I've seen from him (being a Rockies fan), but injury problems hurt his value a lot... more than they would a position player.

                                Sierra for Arrieta is a little bit of an under pay in my opinion. I would throw in a mid-lowish C.
                                Denver Broncos
                                Colorado Rockies
                                Denver Nuggets

                                Comment

                                Working...