2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Eh you're a Cubs fan... of course he sucks to you. The point of my last 3 posts was just saying that Colvin is better than Wallace. That's not hard to do... which is why as a Rockies fan, I would rather just not have Wallace at all and move Pacheco to 1B.Denver Broncos
Colorado Rockies
Denver NuggetsComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I'm a Blue Jays fan, and a fairly big Cubs fan, and I think I can objectively state that Colvin was pretty freaking great last year. 117 wRC+. Huge wOBA. He had a high BABIP (which I can regress if you want) but he really shouldn't be in AAA, and if there's any way he can get playing time, it should be looked into."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Fun fact: Tyler Colvin lead the league in getting on base by catcher interference last year, lol.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/tyler...league-leader/"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I'm a Blue Jays fan, and a fairly big Cubs fan, and I think I can objectively state that Colvin was pretty freaking great last year. 117 wRC+. Huge wOBA. He had a high BABIP (which I can regress if you want) but he really shouldn't be in AAA, and if there's any way he can get playing time, it should be looked into.
Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
what would the value of Ellsbury be? if it's not that high who could I include to get more back in returnComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Relievers just don't hold much value unless they're an all-star closer.
McPherson holds some potential to be a solid starter and the only OF that the Cubs have worth a B is Soriano and you already traded him.
And is Hairston/Schierholtz really that much better than Marte? More
relievers really don't add that much. Quality, not quantityComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Denver Broncos
Colorado Rockies
Denver NuggetsComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
There are some Cubs fans who are bitter, but they don't know how to read stats properly. Me personally, how could I be bitter if we didn't give up anything? That trade was basically garbage for garbage as far as I'm considered.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Last edited by AC; 05-30-2013, 04:50 PM."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
So I guess you could say the Cubs got garbage, the Rockies at least gained depth and as of right now they got a starting 2B out of the deal who has a career .995 fielding% at 2B.Denver Broncos
Colorado Rockies
Denver NuggetsComment
-
Comment
Comment