So yea this is directed at me I assume, I understand usually though it takes me a while to finally find a franchise I'm having fun with but once I ge one going I usually play through, last year I played through 4 seasons with the giants after starting like 3 or 4 before it.
2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
So yea this is directed at me I assume, I understand usually though it takes me a while to finally find a franchise I'm having fun with but once I ge one going I usually play through, last year I played through 4 seasons with the giants after starting like 3 or 4 before it. -
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
lol he's on the IR for 3-4 months, but I think it's semi fair cause I'm taking 6.5M off their hands and Keppinger isnt that productive. he seems awful fielding tooGo Bucs!Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
So yea this is directed at me I assume, I understand usually though it takes me a while to finally find a franchise I'm having fun with but once I ge one going I usually play through, last year I played through 4 seasons with the giants after starting like 3 or 4 before it.
Good luck in finding a team to stick with, I know it can be tempting to try other teams!Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
If the Sox are in contention they likely wouldn't deal Peavy or Kepp.
If they're out of contention, they'd probably not have a need for Morales.
That's imo.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Also, I was more thinking about Twins 'spects like Buxton, Kepler, Arcia, and maybe Sano in LF eventually. It just seems they have more high impact OF prospects than most, and in the off chance that they were contending, I think Terry Ryan might deal from depth.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I just think Crisp carries sneaky value, a lot of it comes from speed and defense which is traditionally hard to measure (hence why the A's are a good fit).
Also, I was more thinking about Twins 'spects like Buxton, Kepler, Arcia, and maybe Sano in LF eventually. It just seems they have more high impact OF prospects than most, and in the off chance that they were contenting, I think Terry Ryan might deal from depth.
Sano in RF, Hicks in LF, Buxton in CF is the likely outcome, and since prospects - shocker lol - bust every so often, why trade anyone now?"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Where's Oswaldo? DHing? Sure they bust often, but you'd like to get MLB talent back before it happens if possible. If the Twins are contending, they might listen on Hicks is all I'm saying. I'm not saying Crisp by himself is worth Hicks. I was more to the point that people were 100% discounting Hicks getting dealt in any way shape or form.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Ya I play my on 1 Jays dynasty but I have had a sim dynasty with all 30 teams for fun to see what happened and I noticed the Twins need for a solid lead off OF ...Ill do Crisp/Doolittle for Hicks/Doumit...thanks guysComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Haha. TAKE A PICTURE of this deal! It might be the most fair and logical deal ever offered from video game AI! Rickie Weeks would fill a need for the Dodgers, and the Crew could use another long-term starter in Billingsley though he's toast in the short term. Tolleson is just gravy.
Where's Oswaldo? DHing? Sure they bust often, but you'd like to get MLB talent back before it happens if possible. If the Twins are contending, they might listen on Hicks is all I'm saying. I'm not saying Crisp by himself is worth Hicks. I was more to the point that people were 100% discounting Hicks getting dealt in any way shape or form."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Where's Oswaldo? DHing? Sure they bust often, but you'd like to get MLB talent back before it happens if possible. If the Twins are contending, they might listen on Hicks is all I'm saying. I'm not saying Crisp by himself is worth Hicks. I was more to the point that people were 100% discounting Hicks getting dealt in any way shape or form.Comment
Comment