2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #5311
    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by CKW11
    Yes Hosmer is extremely unrealistic IMO. They just traded one of the best prospects in baseball to get an established starting pitcher in order to win now, and Hosmer is a key part of their future.
    Alright, thanks, I figured as much but that he was on WTNY's list was enough for me to at least ask.

    Originally posted by G3no_11
    If you want me to say why I think they are built for a run in the next year or 2 I can, but I already troll the thread with my Rockies talk too much haha.
    No, please tell me more about CarGo's superstar talent level and how Tyler Colvin is the next coming.
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • KingFry
      Pro
      • May 2013
      • 704

      #5312
      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by ACMilan99
      Kingfry, take a look at some of these packages and tell me how you like them.



      That's the advice (most of it) I gave k_mac, so take that how you will.

      I like the (players name shall not be mentioned) one, and the Dodgers one, but I'm trying to keep a spot open for Baez at 3B in the future... I may take the Braves second one though... I really like it. But before I do that, if I do take the Texas or Dodgers one, what should I do with Baez? Trading Barney is unrealistic plus he is a great fielder, so I don't know if I'd move him to 2B, or trade him or what...
      White Sox Franchise

      Jaguars Franchise

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #5313
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by KingFry
        I like the (players name shall not be mentioned) one, and the Dodgers one, but I'm trying to keep a spot open for Baez at 3B in the future... I may take the Braves second one though... I really like it. But before I do that, if I do take the Texas or Dodgers one, what should I do with Baez? Trading Barney is unrealistic plus he is a great fielder, so I don't know if I'd move him to 2B, or trade him or what...
        If you like Barney that much, then don't bother with a 3B trade. If I were you, I'd take the first Jays one or either of the Red Sox ones. Maybe the second Jays one.
        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • KingFry
          Pro
          • May 2013
          • 704

          #5314
          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by ACMilan99
          If you like Barney that much, then don't bother with a 3B trade. If I were you, I'd take the first Jays one or either of the Red Sox ones. Maybe the second Jays one.
          Well I like the Dodgers one but I'm trying to be realistic-- so do you think it would be realistic to move Barney? I didn't think it was very realistic, but if other people do I can move him.
          White Sox Franchise

          Jaguars Franchise

          Comment

          • DaBull_33
            I Just Shipped My Bed!
            • Mar 2013
            • 601

            #5315
            I would say that, realistically, Brothers would probably be the toughest arm to acquire out of the Rockies 'pen. His youth, stuff, and left-handedness make him a highly coveted prize for Mr. O'Dowd. Not saying he's untouchable (I don't think anyone in Colorado is untouchable for the right price), but if you're going for realism, he would definitely demand the highest price of any reliever. Just my two cents.

            Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
            MLB 13 The Show Dynasty -- Mile High Magic Returns: A Colorado Rockies Dynasty Is Born

            Comment

            • AC
              Win the East
              • Sep 2010
              • 14951

              #5316
              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by KingFry
              Well I like the Dodgers one but I'm trying to be realistic-- so do you think it would be realistic to move Barney? I didn't think it was very realistic, but if other people do I can move him.
              I don't think it would be super realistic.

              Why do you want to move Barney now?
              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

              Comment

              • WaitTilNextYear
                Go Cubs Go
                • Mar 2013
                • 16830

                #5317
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Too lazy to multi-quote...

                Yes, Hosmer is currently unreaslitic. That was kind of my point. I think the Royals bank on him much like the Mets bank on Ike Davis. I don't think Hosmer is SUPER unrealistic though, especially if the Royals' season goes like I think it will...Not guaranteeing they trade him, but just saying he's a rung or two down from the untouchability of Jason Heyward or something.

                A mid A is FAR too much for Garza no matter how he's pitching. I thought AC meant to knock his value down a peg?

                Even at the height of his value last year (before injuries and with another year of team control) Garza could not get a mid A. I realize the young 3B for Texas is an A in the game, and was rumored to be in a deal, but he's not seen that way by most prospect people anymore.

                Barney, untouchable? LOL. Cubs were talking to Detroit about him last year.

                By the way, thanks for explaining what people see about Lawrie. I hope he reaches his potential--would be good for the game.
                Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                Comment

                • KingFry
                  Pro
                  • May 2013
                  • 704

                  #5318
                  Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by ACMilan99
                  I don't think it would be super realistic.

                  Why do you want to move Barney now?
                  Maybe not now but overall in any season...(obviously not including when he is 34-35-36).

                  But I was just mentioning it. I think I'm gonna go with the Dodgers... I thought Lee was a B POT for a second then I realized he is an A, so that makes me more willing--haha.
                  White Sox Franchise

                  Jaguars Franchise

                  Comment

                  • WaitTilNextYear
                    Go Cubs Go
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 16830

                    #5319
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    With all due respect, and I know a few people like that Dodgers trade, the Dodgers would never trade that much for Garza (he's a rental and not as good as you'd think he is anyway). Seager and Lee are too coveted by the Dodgers. I know money isn't an issue, but I assume they still have people with some baseball knowledge working there.

                    Seager and Lee would be Christmas in July for Cubs fans.
                    Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                    Comment

                    • AC
                      Win the East
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 14951

                      #5320
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                      Too lazy to multi-quote...

                      So am I so I'm putting these in bold haha.

                      Yes, Hosmer is currently unreaslitic. That was kind of my point. I think the Royals bank on him much like the Mets bank on Ike Davis. I don't think Hosmer is SUPER unrealistic though, especially if the Royals' season goes like I think it will...Not guaranteeing they trade him, but just saying he's a rung or two down from the untouchability of Jason Heyward or something.

                      Okay, thanks for clarifying. He's off to a .341 start with 3 dingers so far so I think I'm gonna stay away from that ridiculous price haha.

                      A mid A is FAR too much for Garza no matter how he's pitching. I thought AC meant to knock his value down a peg?

                      I'm trying to steer him to some of the lower packages that I suggested. I only suggested mid A's for k_mac because of how he was pitching.

                      Even at the height of his value last year (before injuries and with another year of team control) Garza could not get a mid A. I realize the young 3B for Texas is an A in the game, and was rumored to be in a deal, but he's not seen that way by most prospect people anymore.

                      k_mac was really pitching well with him and not touching that last sentence lol.

                      Barney, untouchable? LOL. Cubs were talking to Detroit about him last year.

                      Unrealistic, not untouchable lol.

                      By the way, thanks for explaining what people see about Lawrie. I hope he reaches his potential--would be good for the game.

                      And for the Blue Jays, which I think we can agree they need haha.
                      babababold.

                      Originally posted by KingFry
                      Maybe not now but overall in any season...(obviously not including when he is 34-35-36).

                      But I was just mentioning it. I think I'm gonna go with the Dodgers... I thought Lee was a B POT for a second then I realized he is an A, so that makes me more willing--haha.
                      Oh, yeah, then that'd be realistic.

                      Lee is an A in your chise? Okay that changes things, he's a B in mine.
                      "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                      Comment

                      • KingFry
                        Pro
                        • May 2013
                        • 704

                        #5321
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by ACMilan99
                        babababold.



                        Oh, yeah, then that'd be realistic.

                        Lee is an A in your chise? Okay that changes things, he's a B in mine.
                        Oh no.... ahh, hahahaha, even after I literally just pitched a 1 hitter with him? Woosh... Although Lee basically is just a Low A, so it is a Low A, and a Mid B for Garza who is pitching great + dodgers on a playoff run.
                        Last edited by KingFry; 05-31-2013, 07:37 PM.
                        White Sox Franchise

                        Jaguars Franchise

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #5322
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Okay guys, I need some help. Here are some trades I'm planning to do (with stats for once!). I'm around 15 games in or something like that so nothing major here.

                          Texas trade
                          Spoiler


                          Seattle Trade 1
                          Spoiler


                          Seattle Trade 2
                          Spoiler


                          Seattle Trade 3
                          Spoiler


                          Any advice from anyone? Obviously fairness and realism are 100% necessary.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • AC
                            Win the East
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 14951

                            #5323
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by KingFry
                            Oh no.... ahh, hahahaha, even after I literally just pitched a 1 hitter with him? Woosh... Although Lee basically is just a Low A, so it is a Low A, and a Mid B for Garza who is pitching great + dodgers on a playoff run.
                            Seager isn't a mid B.

                            I would just go with the first Red Sox or first Blue Jays one if I were you, maybe the Braves one with Teheran.
                            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                            Comment

                            • G3no_11
                              MVP
                              • Oct 2012
                              • 1110

                              #5324
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by ACMilan99
                              No, please tell me more about CarGo's superstar talent level and how Tyler Colvin is the next coming.
                              Ok here is why I think the Rockies are not going to be sellers this year:

                              First of all, Tyler Colvin is going to return to form around the all-star break and probably carry the team on his back to the World Series. (I'm really not super high on Colvin, I just think he is better than what WTNY is giving him credit for.)

                              But for real, Chacin, Nicasio, and De La Rosa are all starting to become solid starters. (They are all coming off of fairly serious injuries, Chacin with a pectoral issue that really effected his stats and performance last year. Nicasio with a knee injury that kept him out for half of last year and getting hit by a line drive that knocked him out for a year before that. And JDLR with the Tommy John surgery.)

                              I'm not as high on Nicasio because of his inconsistency but I think next year he could solidify himself as a 3-4 starter. What I AM excited about is Chatwood. He's shown that he could be a very solid starter after his play in AAA and his few starts this year in the bigs. I think Pomeranz is finally starting to figure things out in AAA as well which could be huge.

                              That gives the Rockies a fairly solid rotation: Chacin (assuming he gets even better with more seasoning), De La Rosa, Chatwood, Nicasio (assuming he is more consistent by next year, he has shown a lot of improvement his last couple of starts after adding a new pitch), and Pomeranz.

                              Their offense really isn't a concern, especially with Nolan Arenado coming into the mix at 3B which has been the Rockies hole in their lineup for years. Give him the rest of this year in the bigs and he could have a huge year next year.

                              Wilin Rosario has shown a lot of improvement behind the dish. Rutledge was a little bit of a let down, but he could be a very solid player if he can figure things out this year. (I think he was just called up too soon and having him switch positions didn't help much with his development either.)

                              Throw all of that together with Tulo, CarGo, Fowler, Cuddyer and a bullpen that has been impressive, and you will have a team that is built for a run for the division.

                              The reason I don't think they are sellers THIS year is because I think they are going to let this group play it out for a year or two to see if they can make a run with Arenado in the mix. If they don't show any promising signs in a year or two than I would fully expect CarGo and possibly Tulo dealt to get value while they are still under contract.

                              But I really just can't see any major deals being made this year.

                              So there's that. Let the bashing begin.
                              Denver Broncos
                              Colorado Rockies
                              Denver Nuggets

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #5325
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by G3no_11
                                So there's that. Let the bashing begin.
                                obligatory:

                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...