2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Kind of. Seth Smith is nothing great, but what about their other OF depth? If Chris Young is playing along with Cespedes and Reddick, it's probably ok. Brandon Moss can DH.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
a) traded for/signed another MLB level OF
b) they're getting an OF back
c) called up one of their OF prospects
Their OF depth isn't great, but Smith isn't a star either. He can be replaced, but they don't have much depth at the position. If they added another OF, it's fine.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
If he's unrealistic I really need a lefty with some pop to come off my bench as the Braves.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I'm just past the all star break in my 'chise and looking to make some deals for the other contending teams and was wondering how far out a team would have to be out to be considered sellers? Also if the Cards and Braves are completely out of it would McCann and Beltran be guys they would try to move?Comment
-
I'm just past the all star break in my 'chise and looking to make some deals for the other contending teams and was wondering how far out a team would have to be out to be considered sellers? Also if the Cards and Braves are completely out of it would McCann and Beltran be guys they would try to move?
It's been established that both guys would be realistically available if both teams are well out of contention.
Stats and team needs may play a roll in overall value.
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2MLB 13 The Show Dynasty -- Mile High Magic Returns: A Colorado Rockies Dynasty Is BornComment
-
At the beginning of the season, trying to get rid of Albert Pujols as the Angels. What could I get for him and which teams would be interested in acquiring him?Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
This has been covered before. I'd suggest looking him up. This is not possible with any speck of realism though. His contract is way too big (why you want to get rid of him is why no one else would have him).Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I would call it your spreadsheet much sooner than I would call it mine, my friend
Can someone PM me a full write up, in depth, on how to tell if someone is a high/low potential? I'm completely wiped, ridiculous day, so I'm too tired, but I want to put it in the OP. Thanks in advance, sorry for the laziness."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Sort by potential, then look at the OVR rankings. For example, you'll have a list like this:
Player A - Pot B - 72 OVR
Player B - Pot B - 68 OVR
Player C - Pot B - 59 OVR
Player D - Pot B - 80 OVR
Player E - Pot B - 76 OVR
Player F - Pot B - 66 OVR
Player G - Pot B - 68 OVR
Player H - Pot B - 65 OVR
Player I - Pot B - 61 OVR
Player J - Pot B - 74 OVR
Player K - Pot B - 70 OVR
Player L - Pot B - 79 OVR
Player M - Pot B - 55 OVR
The OVR is ranked by each subset of potential. For example, Players A-C are the highest B potential players on this list. Then D-F, and so on until you come to the lowest B potential players, L&M. Hope that helps.
This is what sink put for you guys earlier.PSN Name - xboxxerx
You can call it being a "Homer". But as Tupac said, its California Love.
My Teams
NFL- San Francisco 49ers
NBA- Los Angeles Lakers
NHL- Anaheim Ducks
MLB - Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
NCAA - USCComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Jedd Gyorko....Padres....2B/3B.....B/T R/R....high B + low B (??)
Jose Iglesias....Sawx....SS/3B....B/T R/R.....high B + mid C (??)
Thanks Totte.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I like Gyorko's value but Iglesias is much too high. Low B at the most but I'd be more inclined for a high CComment
Comment