2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #5581
    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by clarsen4
    Is this a fair deal?
    I don't see too much wrong with it.
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • bwoodring9
      Pro
      • May 2012
      • 683

      #5582
      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by CameRoN0407
      Yes, you make valid points. But Bogaerts would most likely be a fall call-up. So a month and maybe a half of Rollins, then that's it. He also has a contract that lasts until 2014. So a year of him either on the bench, or in Pawtucket.

      But this is all from a realism standpoint. If the OP isn't strong on realism, it's not bad.
      I'm strong on realism haha.

      Comment

      • clarsen4
        Rookie
        • Mar 2013
        • 22

        #5583
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by ACMilan99
        I don't see too much wrong with it.
        I thought so to just wanted to get an opinion, very much appreciated

        Comment

        • CameRoN0407
          It's a New England Thing
          • Oct 2012
          • 3328

          #5584
          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by ACMilan99
          I don't see too much wrong with it.
          Same here, it also gives room for Puig.
          Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
          Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

          Team USA
          Red Sox
          Patriots
          Celtics
          Bruins

          Comment

          • AC
            Win the East
            • Sep 2010
            • 14951

            #5585
            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by bwoodring9
            I'm strong on realism haha.
            Still no worries.
            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

            Comment

            • bwoodring9
              Pro
              • May 2012
              • 683

              #5586
              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by ACMilan99
              Still no worries.
              Only 3 days left before the deadline haha.

              Comment

              • bwoodring9
                Pro
                • May 2012
                • 683

                #5587
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Still contemplating if I should just have a complete overhaul of the team... Lee and Rollins could be guys to go I suppose.

                Comment

                • AC
                  Win the East
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 14951

                  #5588
                  Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by bwoodring9
                  Still contemplating if I should just have a complete overhaul of the team... Lee and Rollins could be guys to go I suppose.
                  Lee is going to get you something really, really nice.
                  "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                  Comment

                  • bwoodring9
                    Pro
                    • May 2012
                    • 683

                    #5589
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by ACMilan99
                    Lee is going to get you something really, really nice.
                    Yeah he just threw a complete game too. I'm torn because he's been so great this year, but I could get a solid package for him.

                    Comment

                    • AC
                      Win the East
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 14951

                      #5590
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by bwoodring9
                      Yeah he just threw a complete game too. I'm torn because he's been so great this year, but I could get a solid package for him.
                      Unless you want to compete in a stacked (kinda) NLE, I wouldn't do it. Go for a nice package to replenish your farm.
                      "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                      Comment

                      • bwoodring9
                        Pro
                        • May 2012
                        • 683

                        #5591
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by ACMilan99
                        Unless you want to compete in a stacked (kinda) NLE, I wouldn't do it. Go for a nice package to replenish your farm.
                        Yeah, I'm already 10 games back and lost Ruiz and young for a few months. I'd just have no pitching depth haha

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #5592
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by bwoodring9
                          Yeah, I'm already 10 games back and lost Ruiz and young for a few months. I'd just have no pitching depth haha
                          Well you don't need to worry about that if you rebuild, which you should. I think so, anyways.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • RoughRiders9
                            Rookie
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 141

                            #5593
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            I'm in the 1st season of my Cubs franchise and I'm looking to unload some players as they're last in their division and it's already July.

                            The players that I have on the block are the following: Alfonso Soriano, Carlos Marmol, Nate Schierholtz, David DeJesus and possibly Matt Garza.

                            I just proposed a trade to the Rangers and it seems like I'm totally ripping off the Rangers (i swear the game logic "accepts" this trade):

                            Carlos Marmol for Luke Jackson, Cody Buckel and Martin Perez. The three are amongst the Rangers' top pitching prospect. Do you think I'm just being a jackass and am ripping them off, or is it a trade that I should go ahead and make?

                            ALSO, for the love of my life, I CANNOT trade Soriano, DeJesus or Schierholtz. I tried to click on every possible players on several teams and nobody would budge.

                            Any suggestions about these players?

                            Thanks in advance!

                            Comment

                            • Deuce2223
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Dec 2007
                              • 12571

                              #5594
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by RoughRiders9
                              I'm in the 1st season of my Cubs franchise and I'm looking to unload some players as they're last in their division and it's already July.

                              The players that I have on the block are the following: Alfonso Soriano, Carlos Marmol, Nate Schierholtz, David DeJesus and possibly Matt Garza.

                              I just proposed a trade to the Rangers and it seems like I'm totally ripping off the Rangers (i swear the game logic "accepts" this trade):

                              Carlos Marmol for Luke Jackson, Cody Buckel and Martin Perez. The three are amongst the Rangers' top pitching prospect. Do you think I'm just being a jackass and am ripping them off, or is it a trade that I should go ahead and make?

                              ALSO, for the love of my life, I CANNOT trade Soriano, DeJesus or Schierholtz. I tried to click on every possible players on several teams and nobody would budge.

                              Any suggestions about these players?

                              Thanks in advance!

                              CPU trade logic is broke, thus why it's best to turn off CPU trading, turn on forced trades, use 30 team control and make the moves via coming here and asking for help.

                              So yes, you are ripping them off, there is no team that would give up 3 of their top prospects for Marmol. You could/should be able to maybe land 1, last year they had a deal to send him to the Angeles for D. Haren.

                              As far as Soriano and the rest your best bet is the Mets. They need MLB OF's and all 3 are rated higher then their LF,CF, and RF. Don't expect to get much, probably a couple C prospects, but that is the only team I know off without forced trades on.

                              If you can force deals, then Soriano is a good fit to go back to the Yankees or maybe the Giants. I would even be willing to take him in a Mariner uni if we were in the playoff hunt. DeJesus or Schierholtz to playoff contenders that maybe have a starting OF on the DL. I believe in my Franchise when playing with the Cubs, I sent Dejesus to the Nat's as their #4 OF an Schierholtz to the Mets or Redsox's.

                              Comment

                              • RoughRiders9
                                Rookie
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 141

                                #5595
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by Deuce2223
                                CPU trade logic is broke, thus why it's best to turn off CPU trading, turn on forced trades, use 30 team control and make the moves via coming here and asking for help.

                                So yes, you are ripping them off, there is no team that would give up 3 of their top prospects for Marmol. You could/should be able to maybe land 1, last year they had a deal to send him to the Angeles for D. Haren.

                                As far as Soriano and the rest your best bet is the Mets. They need MLB OF's and all 3 are rated higher then their LF,CF, and RF. Don't expect to get much, probably a couple C prospects, but that is the only team I know off without forced trades on.

                                If you can force deals, then Soriano is a good fit to go back to the Yankees or maybe the Giants. I would even be willing to take him in a Mariner uni if we were in the playoff hunt. DeJesus or Schierholtz to playoff contenders that maybe have a starting OF on the DL. I believe in my Franchise when playing with the Cubs, I sent Dejesus to the Nat's as their #4 OF an Schierholtz to the Mets or Redsox's.
                                Yes, I definitely agree with the CPU Trade logic being broken. That's why I kept it off until the "trade season" that way there won't be any stupid trades here and there.

                                So, here's the "chart" of what kind of players they might be able to bring in:

                                Alfonso Soriano to a Playoff Contender for 1 B and 1 C, or 3 C's or what?

                                Carlos Marmol to a Playoff Contender in need of bullpen, 1 B or 2 C's?

                                DeJesus/Schierholtz to a Playoff Contender in need of 4th OF for _____________?

                                Thanks!

                                Comment

                                Working...