NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

[spankdatazz22]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

I'm not complaining about 2K7. I'm setting up a wish list for 2K8. When I'm pointing out something is incorrect, I'm getting hate for "complaining"

I can see where that could be perceived as complaining. 2K7 isn't even out yet and you're already looking past it. A 2K8 wishlist be more appropriate after the game comes out

[dschifftyy]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

This is sort of off topic from the conversation that's currently going on but it's relevant to the general thing...
Anyway, in these videos, I can see what people are talking about in terms of how it looks better on the 360 when compared to the ps3, but it seems like the recording quality on the 360 clips are off screen in these interviews.
There's just something about the way they look, so it seems like the ps3 clips were direct feeds, but not the 360 clips
Is it just me?

[aholbert32]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

dude im not trying to cause conflict here, i dont get it. did i say stadiums suck? or that they werent good? no I said they didnt appear to be "redone" from last years version and i showed some proof. i mean the basic root of my prob w/this is that shea is untouched which angers me but im not going to not point out what ppl say if i feel they are wrong. nor am i going to turn away from someone who offers up evidence that i am wrong. if theres anything out there showing ppl that stadiums are re done, id like to see it, i will tell you im wrong. im not debating for the sake of it or to be a jerk or to hurt anyones feelings.

2 posters have presented changes to Wrigley and one other park. Also, from what I've seen the Giants park looks different so please stop saying that k did not improve or add on to any of the parks. You are just mad that Shea looks the same to you.

[aholbert32]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

I'm not complaining about 2K7. I'm pointing out issues in 2K7 (that I'm damn near positive that they didn't have time for) that I'd like to see addressed for 2K8. Again, I'm not complaining about 2K7. I'm setting up a wish list for 2K8. When I'm pointing out something is incorrect, I'm getting hate for "complaining".

Again, I'm not complaining. As people may know, I don't have a next-gen system, so the odds of me buying this title that I'm pleasing myself over on this side of the connection is remote. That's why I'm jack-happy for 2K8, and I'm just hoping that they go all the way with 2K8 in these regards.

If you want to make a wishlist thread, create it. Do not make every thread into your own personal complaint thread, especially when you dont even plan to buy the game.

[Flawless]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

This is sort of off topic from the conversation that's currently going on but it's relevant to the general thing...
Anyway, in these videos, I can see what people are talking about in terms of how it looks better on the 360 when compared to the ps3, but it seems like the recording quality on the 360 clips are off screen in these interviews.
There's just something about the way they look, so it seems like the ps3 clips were direct feeds, but not the 360 clips
Is it just me?

No, you're right. PS3 footage is direct-feed, while the 360 footage is off-screen.

[dschifftyy]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

k, thanks man
Just makin sure i'm not crazy

[diamondw23]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

BLZER, not everyone is taking offense to your criticism of this game. (Im not choosing sides or hoping this thread becomes a forum for it either) After KUSH's 2K6 offering, I think it's fair for you/us to hold people accountable, too. I DO think that we ALL want this game to excell, however?

Last season was horrible for baseball gaming. I'd jump back & forth between 2K6 (360) & "The Show" all the time. I'd be enjoying one game for it's look, the other for it's substance... It really made it hard for me to complete a full season on either platform.

I know how much time you've put in playing, critiquing, & in most cases DEFENDING the 2K series... Keep it up! All of you... keep it up! Kush is getting closer baseball nirvana I think? But W/O some game play reassurances, I'll reserve judgement...

-GW-

[triplej96]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

WOW, looks like a vast improvement over 2k6. Can'w wait and they gave my cards some love finally.

[onetonmartin]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

I'm amazed at the degree people can nitpick. Stadiums look amazing to me.

[SageInfinite]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

I'm amazed at the degree people can nitpick. Stadiums look amazing to me.

Co-Sign

[Blzer]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

I'm amazed at the degree people can nitpick. Stadiums look amazing to me.

Oh, no doubt. Stadiums look damn right gorgeous! But, you know... it's things like when Busch Stadium looks like this in real life:









But in the game looks like this:











The stadium can look beautiful... but when there's that whole "authenticity" feel of the stadium that people crave... sometimes it's just not there like other games have it.

(If anybody decides to say these two stadiums look the same, then I've lost all hope)

[elicoleman]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

Looks absolutely beautiful.

I love how they show the outside of the stadiums. It takes me back to when Triple Play (I think 98) used to the helecoptor fly into the stadium. I loved that.

[elicoleman]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

Dang Blzer, those pics looking completely different.

[ericjwm]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

But in the game looks like this:

But wasn't that one of the 1st screenshots released of MLB 2K7?
I remember seeing that posted a long time go, so maybe they've improved it since.

[inkcil]

Re: NEW GAMETRAILERS IN DEPTH INTERVIEW...not real realism...in depth jus posted

I agree. There are things that I've seen that still don't look right or that do concern me, but overall, it's night and day from last year. The game looks better to me and I can finally see the direction that MLB2K is heading. Still keeping my fingers crossed that the gameplay is good!

That's exactly how I feel. I don't like the "crouch" of the outfielders when another outfeilder is fielding the ball or the robotic running motions b/c it reminds me too much of the past 2 games...but can I live with them if the controls are tighter and the gameplay better? The answer is yes. I got my fingers AND my toes crossed.

This game IS night and day (in appearance) from last year, but last year was beyond the pit of darkness...so now it is making its way into the twilight. The graphics are prettier this year for sure, but many of those creepy animations (and speedy ball physics) remain and I hope that doesn't impact gameplay the way it has in years past.

The way it plays - no matter how engrossed some of us are with the graphics - the way it plays is what will matter to 3/4 of us.

Even though I'm not falling for 2k7 as hard as others are right now, I don't mind seeing people go "ga ga" for the graphics b/c

1. it's nothing wrong with getting excited about a game before it comes out or before anyone has been able to prove that it's good or bad (what's the worse than can happen) and

2. I beleive that most people will be sensible about this thing, and in spite of the graphics, will call the game garbage if the gameplay is garbage or call the game good if the gameplay is good.