IGN Review---8.4

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • captaink
    Pro
    • Jul 2002
    • 593

    #136
    Re: IGN Review---8.4

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    Leaper said:
    The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:

    "I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."

    To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!

    Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    Yeah, I picked up on that too. The review reaffirmed my decision to purchase the game. The gameplay is slightly improved which is a good thing since the gameplay did not need an overhaul like some other products on the market and online play added is a bonus, although baseball online does not interest me as much as the other sports. In the end the game appears to be pretty much bug free, at least the CPU controlled teams won't have 15 pitchers and 10 positional players on their 25 man roster and it also appears that the player progression works fine in ESPN too.

    Comment

    • rock85
      MVP
      • Jul 2002
      • 3146

      #137
      Re: IGN Review---8.4

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      Leaper said:
      The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:

      "I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."

      To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!

      Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
      Yeah i actually picked that up too and took it as a good thing .One other thing that does bother me is that in the GM mode he simmed 5 seasons and the CPU didn't offer him one trade .I do not like the sound of that hopefully its different in the franchise mode, but i was looking foward to playing it on the GM mode

      Comment

      • rock85
        MVP
        • Jul 2002
        • 3146

        #138
        Re: IGN Review---8.4

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        Leaper said:
        The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:

        "I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."

        To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!

        Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
        Yeah i actually picked that up too and took it as a good thing .One other thing that does bother me is that in the GM mode he simmed 5 seasons and the CPU didn't offer him one trade .I do not like the sound of that hopefully its different in the franchise mode, but i was looking foward to playing it on the GM mode

        Comment

        • rock85
          MVP
          • Jul 2002
          • 3146

          #139
          Re: IGN Review---8.4

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          Leaper said:
          The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:

          "I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."

          To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!

          Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
          Yeah i actually picked that up too and took it as a good thing .One other thing that does bother me is that in the GM mode he simmed 5 seasons and the CPU didn't offer him one trade .I do not like the sound of that hopefully its different in the franchise mode, but i was looking foward to playing it on the GM mode

          Comment

          • scamden311
            Banned
            • Feb 2003
            • 907

            #140
            Re: IGN Review---8.4

            Yeah, like saying a guy that batted .240 and hit 10 hr a year ago but improved this year to .260 and 20 homers is better than a guy that bats .360 and hits 46 homers consistantly.

            I think a better comparison is a player who last year batted 250 with 15 Hrs(Mvp), comes out and hits 340 with 50 homers and nearly wins the triple crown.Meanwhile the guys who hit 285 with 25 hrs last year(ESPN), hits 285 with 25 hrs again this year.Nothing to be ashamed of. Good season for both players.

            Comment

            • scamden311
              Banned
              • Feb 2003
              • 907

              #141
              Re: IGN Review---8.4

              Yeah, like saying a guy that batted .240 and hit 10 hr a year ago but improved this year to .260 and 20 homers is better than a guy that bats .360 and hits 46 homers consistantly.

              I think a better comparison is a player who last year batted 250 with 15 Hrs(Mvp), comes out and hits 340 with 50 homers and nearly wins the triple crown.Meanwhile the guys who hit 285 with 25 hrs last year(ESPN), hits 285 with 25 hrs again this year.Nothing to be ashamed of. Good season for both players.

              Comment

              • scamden311
                Banned
                • Feb 2003
                • 907

                #142
                Re: IGN Review---8.4

                Yeah, like saying a guy that batted .240 and hit 10 hr a year ago but improved this year to .260 and 20 homers is better than a guy that bats .360 and hits 46 homers consistantly.

                I think a better comparison is a player who last year batted 250 with 15 Hrs(Mvp), comes out and hits 340 with 50 homers and nearly wins the triple crown.Meanwhile the guys who hit 285 with 25 hrs last year(ESPN), hits 285 with 25 hrs again this year.Nothing to be ashamed of. Good season for both players.

                Comment

                • captaink
                  Pro
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 593

                  #143
                  Re: IGN Review---8.4

                  I'm actually not too interested in the GM mode, all I want to do is run a franchise with the Mets, I don't really want to worry about being fired and then have to manage a team I don't like.

                  Comment

                  • captaink
                    Pro
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 593

                    #144
                    Re: IGN Review---8.4

                    I'm actually not too interested in the GM mode, all I want to do is run a franchise with the Mets, I don't really want to worry about being fired and then have to manage a team I don't like.

                    Comment

                    • captaink
                      Pro
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 593

                      #145
                      Re: IGN Review---8.4

                      I'm actually not too interested in the GM mode, all I want to do is run a franchise with the Mets, I don't really want to worry about being fired and then have to manage a team I don't like.

                      Comment

                      • Badgun
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 2638

                        #146
                        Re: IGN Review---8.4

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Leaper said:
                        The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:

                        "I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."

                        To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!

                        Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        I agree with you 100%. I was going to post the same thing, but you beat me to it.
                        No, I didn't draft Grossman on my fantasy team, what do you think I am an idiot?

                        Comment

                        • Badgun
                          MVP
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 2638

                          #147
                          Re: IGN Review---8.4

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Leaper said:
                          The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:

                          "I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."

                          To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!

                          Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          I agree with you 100%. I was going to post the same thing, but you beat me to it.
                          No, I didn't draft Grossman on my fantasy team, what do you think I am an idiot?

                          Comment

                          • Badgun
                            MVP
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 2638

                            #148
                            Re: IGN Review---8.4

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Leaper said:
                            The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:

                            "I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."

                            To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!

                            Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            I agree with you 100%. I was going to post the same thing, but you beat me to it.
                            No, I didn't draft Grossman on my fantasy team, what do you think I am an idiot?

                            Comment

                            • fossen
                              Bl*bfl*th z*p!
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 7098

                              #149
                              Re: IGN Review---8.4

                              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                              jordan0386 said:
                              from the man himself

                              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
                              To be perfectly clear, "the man" being referred to here is not God, Stan "The Man" Musial, Stan "The Man" Lee, The Man With The Golden Gun, The Man With The Golden Gun, or even The Man of oppression fame.

                              These comments are a cut-and-paste of FatPitcher's comments made on the ESPNVideogames message boards.

                              Comment

                              • fossen
                                Bl*bfl*th z*p!
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 7098

                                #150
                                Re: IGN Review---8.4

                                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                                jordan0386 said:
                                from the man himself

                                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
                                To be perfectly clear, "the man" being referred to here is not God, Stan "The Man" Musial, Stan "The Man" Lee, The Man With The Golden Gun, The Man With The Golden Gun, or even The Man of oppression fame.

                                These comments are a cut-and-paste of FatPitcher's comments made on the ESPNVideogames message boards.

                                Comment

                                Working...