</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Anaxamander said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Leaper said:
The following is a quote from the review that was presented by Hilary as a potential problem, that I look at as a HUGE positive:
"I must admit that I've had a bit more of a problem pitching this year than last year, as the pitching effort sometimes too greatly affects location or ball movement, making it a bit more difficult to hit the spots. I'm not really sure if it's intentional or not, but I'm a seasoned veteran of the series and it took me a few games to get accustomed to the sensitivity of this year's pitching system."
To me, this is beyond excellent (assuming he is correct of course). If this is a true statement, pitchers with a better control rating will become even more important. It won't be all about the fireballers!
Did anyone else pick up on this little comment and think it was actually a GOOD thing!?!
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Yes, sounds like a positive to me. Almost every game allows for pin-point pitcher accuracy. The result? You never walk anyone, which we hate.
At this point, after playing MVP, the "features" I'm looking most foward to are:
--player progression that works right
--correct hitting physics for lefties (what a novel concept!)
--ability to play/watch other teams' franchise games
--positional fatigue
--WALKS (although I hardly ever got any last year, I'm hoping to finally find a decent game where the CPU will walk you now and then).
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Count me amoung those that think inept pitching controls are *NOT* a good thing.
Comment