Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

[bkrich83]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
PatsFan said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Badgun said:
Two guys that I have an incredible amount of respect for have weighed in on ESPN Baseball.

Dan Clarke, one of the guys who was involved in starting this very website and Bill Abner, a long time sports game reviewer for practically every major gaming site on the net have given their initial opinions of the game.

Both of their comments are a good read and let me tell you fellows, when these guys speak, E.F. Hutton listens.

http://sportsgamer.blogspot.com/

I've been reading both of these guys' stuff for a long time and I don't think I've ever seen them say anything that wasn't right on the money.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

You respect these guys? Why, because it says what you want to hear?

Gotta be honest, their writing style is limp, their reasoning, flawed, and their taste in games is speaks to someone with little to no real sports experience. Most likely coach potatoes that have never played a sport in their lives.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Patsfan settle down. I feel the same way on a lot of things they say also. Please tell me how I have never played a sport in my life.

[Bill_Abner]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
PatsFan said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Badgun said:
Two guys that I have an incredible amount of respect for have weighed in on ESPN Baseball.

Dan Clarke, one of the guys who was involved in starting this very website and Bill Abner, a long time sports game reviewer for practically every major gaming site on the net have given their initial opinions of the game.

Both of their comments are a good read and let me tell you fellows, when these guys speak, E.F. Hutton listens.

http://sportsgamer.blogspot.com/

I've been reading both of these guys' stuff for a long time and I don't think I've ever seen them say anything that wasn't right on the money.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

You respect these guys? Why, because it says what you want to hear?

Gotta be honest, their writing style is limp, their reasoning, flawed, and their taste in games is speaks to someone with little to no real sports experience. Most likely coach potatoes that have never played a sport in their lives.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

My writing may be limp but my...well...nevermind.

I'd love to know how my reasoning is, flawed, or how that my "taste in games is speaks to someone with little to no real sports experience", whatever that means; but I feel a thread lock about to happen at any moment.

If you'd like to debate this stuff like a semi-literate adult, I'm all for it. Differing opinions make the world go 'round. Throwing ignorant insults around without at least backing up what you say makes you look a little childish, though.

[Bill_Abner]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
PatsFan said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Badgun said:
Two guys that I have an incredible amount of respect for have weighed in on ESPN Baseball.

Dan Clarke, one of the guys who was involved in starting this very website and Bill Abner, a long time sports game reviewer for practically every major gaming site on the net have given their initial opinions of the game.

Both of their comments are a good read and let me tell you fellows, when these guys speak, E.F. Hutton listens.

http://sportsgamer.blogspot.com/

I've been reading both of these guys' stuff for a long time and I don't think I've ever seen them say anything that wasn't right on the money.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

You respect these guys? Why, because it says what you want to hear?

Gotta be honest, their writing style is limp, their reasoning, flawed, and their taste in games is speaks to someone with little to no real sports experience. Most likely coach potatoes that have never played a sport in their lives.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

My writing may be limp but my...well...nevermind.

I'd love to know how my reasoning is, flawed, or how that my "taste in games is speaks to someone with little to no real sports experience", whatever that means; but I feel a thread lock about to happen at any moment.

If you'd like to debate this stuff like a semi-literate adult, I'm all for it. Differing opinions make the world go 'round. Throwing ignorant insults around without at least backing up what you say makes you look a little childish, though.

[Bill_Abner]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
PatsFan said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Badgun said:
Two guys that I have an incredible amount of respect for have weighed in on ESPN Baseball.

Dan Clarke, one of the guys who was involved in starting this very website and Bill Abner, a long time sports game reviewer for practically every major gaming site on the net have given their initial opinions of the game.

Both of their comments are a good read and let me tell you fellows, when these guys speak, E.F. Hutton listens.

http://sportsgamer.blogspot.com/

I've been reading both of these guys' stuff for a long time and I don't think I've ever seen them say anything that wasn't right on the money.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

You respect these guys? Why, because it says what you want to hear?

Gotta be honest, their writing style is limp, their reasoning, flawed, and their taste in games is speaks to someone with little to no real sports experience. Most likely coach potatoes that have never played a sport in their lives.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

My writing may be limp but my...well...nevermind.

I'd love to know how my reasoning is, flawed, or how that my "taste in games is speaks to someone with little to no real sports experience", whatever that means; but I feel a thread lock about to happen at any moment.

If you'd like to debate this stuff like a semi-literate adult, I'm all for it. Differing opinions make the world go 'round. Throwing ignorant insults around without at least backing up what you say makes you look a little childish, though.

[fossen]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Badgun said:
Well hopefully the mods will take care of him.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Done.

PatsFan is taking a break.

[fossen]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Badgun said:
Well hopefully the mods will take care of him.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Done.

PatsFan is taking a break.

[fossen]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Badgun said:
Well hopefully the mods will take care of him.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Done.

PatsFan is taking a break.

[wwharton]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

Wow, and I was just about to suggest it was time for that. I respect anyone's opinions, even when some are more harsh but that guy is just an ***.

Speaking of which, mvandor, two things you should know. 1. you don't speak for me or anyone else. If you don't like something, that's fine but the world does not revolve around you. 2. since i don't know you and don't know what you do for a living, i can't accurately access your project management ability, however i'm pretty sure you aren't on the team that made this game so i find it curious that you speak with such certainty that any time was "wasted" creating a mode and that's the reason something else wasn't done or done properly. such certainty that you would even call the management team boneheads. can i have a copy of your memo about their limited resources?

[wwharton]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

Wow, and I was just about to suggest it was time for that. I respect anyone's opinions, even when some are more harsh but that guy is just an ***.

Speaking of which, mvandor, two things you should know. 1. you don't speak for me or anyone else. If you don't like something, that's fine but the world does not revolve around you. 2. since i don't know you and don't know what you do for a living, i can't accurately access your project management ability, however i'm pretty sure you aren't on the team that made this game so i find it curious that you speak with such certainty that any time was "wasted" creating a mode and that's the reason something else wasn't done or done properly. such certainty that you would even call the management team boneheads. can i have a copy of your memo about their limited resources?

[wwharton]

Re: Two long time reviewers give their take on ESPN

Wow, and I was just about to suggest it was time for that. I respect anyone's opinions, even when some are more harsh but that guy is just an ***.

Speaking of which, mvandor, two things you should know. 1. you don't speak for me or anyone else. If you don't like something, that's fine but the world does not revolve around you. 2. since i don't know you and don't know what you do for a living, i can't accurately access your project management ability, however i'm pretty sure you aren't on the team that made this game so i find it curious that you speak with such certainty that any time was "wasted" creating a mode and that's the reason something else wasn't done or done properly. such certainty that you would even call the management team boneheads. can i have a copy of your memo about their limited resources?