Bonds Indicted!

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scottdau
    Banned
    • Feb 2003
    • 32580

    #91
    Re: Bonds Indicted!

    Originally posted by TheMatrix31
    Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't Bonds facing the jail time for perjury and not the steroid use itself?
    Yes, that is why it is bad, the Feds don't like people lying to them.

    Comment

    • stewaat

      #92
      Re: Bonds Indicted!

      Originally posted by The C
      McGuire, Sosa and Palmerio didn't lie in the court of law.

      It is now alleged that Bonds did.
      Palmiero did. Remember the whole finger wagging scene? Then he got the suspension after failing a test.

      I don't remember what Sosa said, if he said anything. What I do know is that Mark McGwire pleaded the 5th. He probably took steroids, BUT HE DIDN'T LIE ABOUT IT. Bonds did to the worst people possible. If he wasn't so arrogant and cocky he wouldn't be in this trouble. Instead he thought he was invincible and he's finding out he's not special because he's a superstar athlete.

      Comment

      • ohyeahbaby123
        Pro
        • Apr 2007
        • 920

        #93
        Re: Bonds Indicted!

        Originally posted by stewaat
        Palmiero did. Remember the whole finger wagging scene? Then he got the suspension after failing a test.

        I don't remember what Sosa said, if he said anything. What I do know is that Mark McGwire pleaded the 5th. He probably took steroids, BUT HE DIDN'T LIE ABOUT IT. Bonds did to the worst people possible. If he wasn't so arrogant and cocky he wouldn't be in this trouble. Instead he thought he was invincible and he's finding out he's not special because he's a superstar athlete.
        Remember, Sosa can't speak English
        Originally posted by iBlievN5
        there... are... people in australia?
        Originally posted by LoCo-LINEBACKER-
        Yes, theyre are, healthy people to, not the obese kind.

        Comment

        • Scottdau
          Banned
          • Feb 2003
          • 32580

          #94
          Re: Bonds Indicted!

          Originally posted by stewaat
          Palmiero did. Remember the whole finger wagging scene? Then he got the suspension after failing a test.

          I don't remember what Sosa said, if he said anything. What I do know is that Mark McGwire pleaded the 5th. He probably took steroids, BUT HE DIDN'T LIE ABOUT IT. Bonds did to the worst people possible. If he wasn't so arrogant and cocky he wouldn't be in this trouble. Instead he thought he was invincible and he's finding out he's not special because he's a superstar athlete.

          Not really, lying is the bad thing about this. The Feds can't let it go unpunished. Or else this will be bad for the feds. Others were lie under oath, that is what the Feds fear. I don't blame them. I say go after anybody that lies under oath.

          Comment

          • snepp
            We'll waste him too.
            • Apr 2003
            • 10007

            #95
            Re: Bonds Indicted!

            Originally posted by stewaat
            Palmiero did. Remember the whole finger wagging scene? Then he got the suspension after failing a test.

            I don't remember what Sosa said, if he said anything. What I do know is that Mark McGwire pleaded the 5th. He probably took steroids, BUT HE DIDN'T LIE ABOUT IT. Bonds did to the worst people possible. If he wasn't so arrogant and cocky he wouldn't be in this trouble. Instead he thought he was invincible and he's finding out he's not special because he's a superstar athlete.
            No, he didn't. Palmiero lied during that Senate commission hearing, not in a court of law, and definately not in front of a federal grand jury.
            Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

            Comment

            • elprez98
              MVP
              • Dec 2003
              • 4237

              #96
              Re: Bonds Indicted!

              30 years for lying about taking steroids? GTF outta here. That's insanity. Give him some community service and call it a gotdamn day. Everybody in the MLB was already doing it so.......

              All of a sudden its time to crackdown. That's pretty darn hypocritical of baseball and its fans.
              Originally posted by My Wife
              "The Celtics only won because they have a magical elf playing for their team...."

              Comment

              • Psyblast
                2023 National Champions
                • Jun 2003
                • 42584

                #97
                Re: Bonds Indicted!

                Originally posted by elprez98
                30 years for lying about taking steroids? GTF outta here. That's insanity. Give him some community service and call it a gotdamn day. Everybody in the MLB was already doing it so.......

                All of a sudden its time to crackdown. That's pretty darn hypocritical of baseball and its fans.



                The fact that he lied about steroids is irrelevant. If he lied about what he had for breakfast under oath, he'd still be in trouble.

                Comment

                • TheMatrix31
                  RF
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 52927

                  #98
                  Re: Bonds Indicted!

                  Yeah, I'm far from a Bonds ***** but when you lie under oath no matter what it's about, you deserve to be punished.

                  Comment

                  • J0nnD0ugh
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 16602

                    #99
                    Re: Bonds Indicted!

                    Originally posted by Lintyfresh85
                    You really couldn't be more wrong... but it's pretty obvious that no matter how many people tell you that you're wrong, you just won't listen.
                    If its obvious I'm wrong about the prosecution lying, why don't you offer proof for me to listen to? It should be easy to do since I'm so obviously incorrect. Instead, you & your sidekicks just make a blanket statement, & have no intelligence to back it up. That's proof enough for me.
                    Originally posted by VP Richard M. Nixon
                    I always remember that whatever I have done in the past, or may do in the future, Duke University is responsible one way or the other.
                    -August 17, 1960
                    Thanks, dookies!

                    Comment

                    • Stu
                      All Star
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 7924

                      #100
                      Re: Bonds Indicted!

                      Originally posted by J0nnD0ugh
                      1. deception - they said they couldn't proceed when they had every intention to.

                      2. untruthful - they said he has essential information when he evidently didn't.

                      3. How could they not know that claim wasn't correct when they are the ones doing the investigating?
                      1. Where/when did they say they couldn't proceed without Anderson? He was found in contempt by the Judge, not the prosecution.

                      2. Just because they were still able to build a case without the information doesn't mean it wasn't and still could be essential.
                      Sim Gaming Network

                      Comment

                      • asrabbit91
                        Banned
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 1242

                        #101
                        Re: Bonds Indicted!

                        If Big Mac would of said he never took steriods, he would still be getting the same problem, there was no right answer. He was smart to not answer, and I admire him for it.

                        Comment

                        • imapotato
                          Banned
                          • Jun 2005
                          • 824

                          #102
                          Re: Bonds Indicted!

                          1) Bonds never lied about taking Steroids...he admitted he might have, he said he never "knowingly" took steroids. Bonds is not a chemist...if I were in the same boat 15 years ago and thought Steroids was injection and not something you could rub on...I could see where he wouldn't know.

                          2) They have the same evidence they had 2 years ago...why now?

                          3) If the ex mistress is the prosecutor's main witness, good luck with that. I have ex's that said I hit them, was a jerk etc. None of it is true...but a woman scorned ya know...

                          Comment

                          • imapotato
                            Banned
                            • Jun 2005
                            • 824

                            #103
                            Re: Bonds Indicted!

                            Originally posted by pinnacleguy2
                            Apparently we are talking about years here, not months. This according to ESPN's legal analysts.
                            ESPN also said 5 years minimum for Vick

                            Extravagant
                            Sensationalism and
                            Patronizing
                            Network

                            I hope THEY broke a law and are indicted with the coverage they are running

                            Comment

                            • AI03
                              Rookie
                              • May 2003
                              • 262

                              #104
                              Re: Bonds Indicted!

                              Sorry if I offend anyone writing this, but:

                              Barry Bonds = Cheater. The writing was always on the wall.

                              See ya, off in the sunset you go...

                              Comment

                              • AI03
                                Rookie
                                • May 2003
                                • 262

                                #105
                                Re: Bonds Indicted!

                                Originally posted by imapotato
                                1) Bonds never lied about taking Steroids...he admitted he might have, he said he never "knowingly" took steroids. Bonds is not a chemist...if I were in the same boat 15 years ago and thought Steroids was injection and not something you could rub on...I could see where he wouldn't know.

                                2) They have the same evidence they had 2 years ago...why now?

                                3) If the ex mistress is the prosecutor's main witness, good luck with that. I have ex's that said I hit them, was a jerk etc. None of it is true...but a woman scorned ya know...
                                Are you defending Bonds?

                                Comment

                                Working...