Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
No one to add right now, but I know Beltre was discussed a couple of pages back, and Grantland wrote a good article on him today worth sharing:
http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-tr...-adrian-beltreComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Roy Halladay. 203-105 I think lead the league in many categories for quite a few years. Low win total works against but I think he belongs.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Halladay also has the narrative for his 2010 season. I would put him in becuase he basically was the best pitcher in the league for a number of years but the post-season no-hitter might carry weight in the HoF process even though it kinda shouldn't.PSN: KMRBlue1027
PS4 Games:
Battlefield 4
MLB: The Show (Duh)
DestinyComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
While never the greatest or close to in any one year Mike Mussina belongs. Andy Pettitte no.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Only 5HOF pitchers have a better win% than Halladay(and only 1 pitcher has 15+ seasons,has a win% better than Halladay and not in the HOF(and that's Pedro,who I don't believe is even eligible yet)Last edited by Majingir; 12-10-2013, 11:00 PM.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I think Halladay may be on the leading edge of pitchers where the "milestone numbers" may not apply as much and you have to look at the total body of work + some of the more esoteric stats. One thing that Halladay has going for him is that IIRC 17% of his starts have been complete games. That's a mind boggling stat in this day and age of babying SP.
I say he'll probably get in but it won't be first ballot.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Tough call. He had nine tremendous years in his 16-year career and was one of the best pitchers of his generation. But I'd be shocked if he made it on the first ballot. There were just so many years when he was on the Jays (and I'm a Jays fan) that he pitched in meaningless games.
It's why I'm surprised he retired when he did. A couple more good years and he'd be a lock but I guess his back couldn't do it.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Tough call. He had nine tremendous years in his 16-year career and was one of the best pitchers of his generation. But I'd be shocked if he made it on the first ballot. There were just so many years when he was on the Jays (and I'm a Jays fan) that he pitched in meaningless games.
It's why I'm surprised he retired when he did. A couple more good years and he'd be a lock but I guess his back couldn't do it.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Roy Halladay deserves to be the HOF. 2 Cy Young Awards (one in each league) while competing with the likes of Johan Santana for it in the AL. 8 All-Star Selections. Led the league 4 times in IPs and has pitched well above 200 innings in 8 of his 16 seasons. Led the league in complete games in seven seasons and in the modern era, his 67 career CGs is far more than the next active pitcher (67 to C.C. Sabathia's 37). His career K/BB ratio is good for 16th all time.
Yeah, maybe not first ballot, but he should get in easily.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Jim Thome. Not too many guys have hit over 600 HR. One dimensional player but OBP is over .400 I believe. Probably clean I think he gets in. Obviously not a first ballot guy but should squeak in down the road.Comment
Comment