Who should win the AL MVP?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NYJets
    Hall Of Fame
    • Jul 2002
    • 18637

    #151
    Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    dce1228 said:
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    NYJets37 said:
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    dce1228 said:
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    NYJets37 said:
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    dce1228 said:

    As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense.


    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    So if Bonds was putting up his current numbers, but on the Yankees, you wouldn't have him the MVP? I know people consider the strength of the team, but I just hate the argument.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    I keep attempting to answer this but the very notion give me indegestion so bad I can barely sit here at the computer...


    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    Thank you for that great contribution to this discussion.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    Okay fine, are you saying in place of Giambi or in addition to him? Because it would all be a matter of how many games this Bonds + Yankees team won... if they won 25 more games, which is plausible, yeah I could see him winning it... it's all about the ammount of games a team wins and how responsible that player is to that success, that's the formula in my mind.




    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    I'm saying, hypothetically speaking, if the Yankees had started this season, with the same team they have now, plus Bonds, and you have no idea what their record is in the real situation, would you be willing to give Bonds the mvp. My point is, you can't always tell how a team would be, without a certain player. How can you tell how many games the Yankees would win without Giambi? Is it safe to say they would be a good team, yea. But no one has any idea whether we would have won the same amount, 5 less, 10 less, or 20 less.

    I'm not really arguing who the mvp should be with this post, I'm arguing the idea that you can base the mvp soley on how good the team would be without him. You just can't tell.
    Originally posted by Jay Bilas
    The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

    Comment

    • NYJets
      Hall Of Fame
      • Jul 2002
      • 18637

      #152
      Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      nivek said:
      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      NYJets37 said:
      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      dce1228 said:

      As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense.


      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      So if Bonds was putting up his current numbers, but on the Yankees, you wouldn't have him the MVP? I know people consider the strength of the team, but I just hate the argument.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      Like I said before, number don't mean anything. It's all about value, so if you put Bonds in Yankee pinstrips his value drops.

      For example: BOTTOM of the Ninth...your team is up one.

      Bonds is up to bat, men on the corners, one out.

      Do you walk bonds to get to Giambi or do you pitch to him?

      Now put Bonds in that same situation as a Giant...will your strategy change or not?



      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      Well, I'd rather face anyone in the league than Bonds, so yes, I'd walk him to get to Giambi. But that isn't really the point I don't think.

      I think you have to use numbers for the most part, because those are the only facts you have. Everything else is just speculation.
      Originally posted by Jay Bilas
      The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

      Comment

      • NYJets
        Hall Of Fame
        • Jul 2002
        • 18637

        #153
        Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        nivek said:
        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        NYJets37 said:
        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        dce1228 said:

        As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense.


        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        So if Bonds was putting up his current numbers, but on the Yankees, you wouldn't have him the MVP? I know people consider the strength of the team, but I just hate the argument.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        Like I said before, number don't mean anything. It's all about value, so if you put Bonds in Yankee pinstrips his value drops.

        For example: BOTTOM of the Ninth...your team is up one.

        Bonds is up to bat, men on the corners, one out.

        Do you walk bonds to get to Giambi or do you pitch to him?

        Now put Bonds in that same situation as a Giant...will your strategy change or not?



        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        Well, I'd rather face anyone in the league than Bonds, so yes, I'd walk him to get to Giambi. But that isn't really the point I don't think.

        I think you have to use numbers for the most part, because those are the only facts you have. Everything else is just speculation.
        Originally posted by Jay Bilas
        The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

        Comment

        • NYJets
          Hall Of Fame
          • Jul 2002
          • 18637

          #154
          Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          nivek said:
          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          NYJets37 said:
          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          dce1228 said:

          As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense.


          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          So if Bonds was putting up his current numbers, but on the Yankees, you wouldn't have him the MVP? I know people consider the strength of the team, but I just hate the argument.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          Like I said before, number don't mean anything. It's all about value, so if you put Bonds in Yankee pinstrips his value drops.

          For example: BOTTOM of the Ninth...your team is up one.

          Bonds is up to bat, men on the corners, one out.

          Do you walk bonds to get to Giambi or do you pitch to him?

          Now put Bonds in that same situation as a Giant...will your strategy change or not?



          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          Well, I'd rather face anyone in the league than Bonds, so yes, I'd walk him to get to Giambi. But that isn't really the point I don't think.

          I think you have to use numbers for the most part, because those are the only facts you have. Everything else is just speculation.
          Originally posted by Jay Bilas
          The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

          Comment

          • dce1228
            MVP
            • Mar 2003
            • 1016

            #155
            Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

            Does anyone know Bill James' formula for win shares? Basically he broke it down into tangible statistics to measure how much credit a player deserves for the success of his team. I think he then measured how that team would fare with the league average run production instead of that player, essentially adding or subtracting them... very interesting stuff... so, yeah, it might be possible to see and make an accurate depiction of the MVP.

            If it's numbers you're looking for this is up your alley.

            Comment

            • dce1228
              MVP
              • Mar 2003
              • 1016

              #156
              Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

              Does anyone know Bill James' formula for win shares? Basically he broke it down into tangible statistics to measure how much credit a player deserves for the success of his team. I think he then measured how that team would fare with the league average run production instead of that player, essentially adding or subtracting them... very interesting stuff... so, yeah, it might be possible to see and make an accurate depiction of the MVP.

              If it's numbers you're looking for this is up your alley.

              Comment

              • dce1228
                MVP
                • Mar 2003
                • 1016

                #157
                Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                Does anyone know Bill James' formula for win shares? Basically he broke it down into tangible statistics to measure how much credit a player deserves for the success of his team. I think he then measured how that team would fare with the league average run production instead of that player, essentially adding or subtracting them... very interesting stuff... so, yeah, it might be possible to see and make an accurate depiction of the MVP.

                If it's numbers you're looking for this is up your alley.

                Comment

                • Nivek
                  H*ll *f F*m*
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 7999

                  #158
                  Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  NYJets37 said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  nivek said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  NYJets37 said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  dce1228 said:

                  As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense.


                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  So if Bonds was putting up his current numbers, but on the Yankees, you wouldn't have him the MVP? I know people consider the strength of the team, but I just hate the argument.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  Like I said before, number don't mean anything. It's all about value, so if you put Bonds in Yankee pinstrips his value drops.

                  For example: BOTTOM of the Ninth...your team is up one.

                  Bonds is up to bat, men on the corners, one out.

                  Do you walk bonds to get to Giambi or do you pitch to him?

                  Now put Bonds in that same situation as a Giant...will your strategy change or not?



                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  Well, I'd rather face anyone in the league than Bonds, so yes, I'd walk him to get to Giambi. But that isn't really the point I don't think.

                  I think you have to use numbers for the most part, because those are the only facts you have. Everything else is just speculation.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  Me personally, I'd pitch to Barry. I wouldn't want to bases loaded with the all that Yankee lineup. Numbers don't tell the whole story, but I understand what your trying to say in regards of it being the only TRUE method of determining the MVP. If that were the case, A-rod would have 2 MVP throphies in his mansion. I think it's 65% value to the team, 35% stats.
                  Cameras or guns, one of them is gonna shoot me to death.

                  Comment

                  • Nivek
                    H*ll *f F*m*
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 7999

                    #159
                    Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    NYJets37 said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    nivek said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    NYJets37 said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    dce1228 said:

                    As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense.


                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    So if Bonds was putting up his current numbers, but on the Yankees, you wouldn't have him the MVP? I know people consider the strength of the team, but I just hate the argument.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    Like I said before, number don't mean anything. It's all about value, so if you put Bonds in Yankee pinstrips his value drops.

                    For example: BOTTOM of the Ninth...your team is up one.

                    Bonds is up to bat, men on the corners, one out.

                    Do you walk bonds to get to Giambi or do you pitch to him?

                    Now put Bonds in that same situation as a Giant...will your strategy change or not?



                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    Well, I'd rather face anyone in the league than Bonds, so yes, I'd walk him to get to Giambi. But that isn't really the point I don't think.

                    I think you have to use numbers for the most part, because those are the only facts you have. Everything else is just speculation.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    Me personally, I'd pitch to Barry. I wouldn't want to bases loaded with the all that Yankee lineup. Numbers don't tell the whole story, but I understand what your trying to say in regards of it being the only TRUE method of determining the MVP. If that were the case, A-rod would have 2 MVP throphies in his mansion. I think it's 65% value to the team, 35% stats.
                    Cameras or guns, one of them is gonna shoot me to death.

                    Comment

                    • Nivek
                      H*ll *f F*m*
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 7999

                      #160
                      Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      NYJets37 said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      nivek said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      NYJets37 said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      dce1228 said:

                      As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense.


                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      So if Bonds was putting up his current numbers, but on the Yankees, you wouldn't have him the MVP? I know people consider the strength of the team, but I just hate the argument.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      Like I said before, number don't mean anything. It's all about value, so if you put Bonds in Yankee pinstrips his value drops.

                      For example: BOTTOM of the Ninth...your team is up one.

                      Bonds is up to bat, men on the corners, one out.

                      Do you walk bonds to get to Giambi or do you pitch to him?

                      Now put Bonds in that same situation as a Giant...will your strategy change or not?



                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      Well, I'd rather face anyone in the league than Bonds, so yes, I'd walk him to get to Giambi. But that isn't really the point I don't think.

                      I think you have to use numbers for the most part, because those are the only facts you have. Everything else is just speculation.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      Me personally, I'd pitch to Barry. I wouldn't want to bases loaded with the all that Yankee lineup. Numbers don't tell the whole story, but I understand what your trying to say in regards of it being the only TRUE method of determining the MVP. If that were the case, A-rod would have 2 MVP throphies in his mansion. I think it's 65% value to the team, 35% stats.
                      Cameras or guns, one of them is gonna shoot me to death.

                      Comment

                      • AI_Franchise03
                        MVP
                        • Dec 2002
                        • 2168

                        #161
                        Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        dce1228 said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        AI_Franchise03 said:

                        You didn't need to make the point for me. I was just waiting for you to comment if you do think it's funny and perhaps why, so that I could respond how you're wrong, but I guess you want me to thank you?

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        Giambi being relegated to the DH slot in favor of the better fielding Nick Johnson makes Giambi as versatile as Jeff Weaver is versatile, pitching middle relief while Jose Contreras goes into the starting rotation. There's a giant difference between that 'versatility' and what Aaron Boone did for the Reds the last year and a half (i.e. playing SS when Larkin was hurt, 2b to start the season to accomodate Brandon Larson, then switching back to 3rd when Larson bit the big one). In other words... IT ISN'T VERSATILITY. End of story. Find a new word to illuminate the underappreciated brilliance of Jason Giambi.

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

                        The last thing, I don't think I made the point I wanted to, concerning Bonds. You sayed you can't give the MVP to a DH,
                        Barry Bonds helps his team more with his bat than his glove. He plays LF regularly, but that doesn't mean he's helping the team very much with his defense.


                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense. And he isn't a DH, like Giambi. He plays the field. I believe with all my soul that Ichiro is more important to the M's than Giambi is to the Yankees-- as do most people... 3 out of the 4 ESPN analysists agreed, with Joe Morgan calling them even.

                        You believe Giambi is the most important because you think the Yankees are the most important. You haven't so much as said anything virtuous about Giambi's competition in this thread-- I think that pretty much makes clear that you lack the groundedness to make any opinions worth a damn.

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        The only guys who you brought up and much of this tread is Ichiro. I bet he does great things for Seattle to help that team win, Giambi does the same with his bat. I'm making a case for my guy, you're making a case for Ichiro. Want me to help?

                        Joe Morgan believes MVP goes to Ichiro, good for him. Though he feels like it's a tight race but he gives his notch to Ichiro thanks to his all-around game.

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        ..and what he had to overcome this season for the sake of the team.

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        What I was talking about.

                        Bonds should thank his team's pitching staff, that's the only thing separating him and Pujols.



                        " I look at him and it's getting to the point where it's just scaring me. He looks younger but he doesn't carry himself in a younger manner. He's impressive, and I'm glad we drafted him. "
                        - Lavar Arrington on his new Redskins teammate Sean Taylor.

                        The World Is At Your Feet.

                        Comment

                        • AI_Franchise03
                          MVP
                          • Dec 2002
                          • 2168

                          #162
                          Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          dce1228 said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          AI_Franchise03 said:

                          You didn't need to make the point for me. I was just waiting for you to comment if you do think it's funny and perhaps why, so that I could respond how you're wrong, but I guess you want me to thank you?

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          Giambi being relegated to the DH slot in favor of the better fielding Nick Johnson makes Giambi as versatile as Jeff Weaver is versatile, pitching middle relief while Jose Contreras goes into the starting rotation. There's a giant difference between that 'versatility' and what Aaron Boone did for the Reds the last year and a half (i.e. playing SS when Larkin was hurt, 2b to start the season to accomodate Brandon Larson, then switching back to 3rd when Larson bit the big one). In other words... IT ISN'T VERSATILITY. End of story. Find a new word to illuminate the underappreciated brilliance of Jason Giambi.

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

                          The last thing, I don't think I made the point I wanted to, concerning Bonds. You sayed you can't give the MVP to a DH,
                          Barry Bonds helps his team more with his bat than his glove. He plays LF regularly, but that doesn't mean he's helping the team very much with his defense.


                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense. And he isn't a DH, like Giambi. He plays the field. I believe with all my soul that Ichiro is more important to the M's than Giambi is to the Yankees-- as do most people... 3 out of the 4 ESPN analysists agreed, with Joe Morgan calling them even.

                          You believe Giambi is the most important because you think the Yankees are the most important. You haven't so much as said anything virtuous about Giambi's competition in this thread-- I think that pretty much makes clear that you lack the groundedness to make any opinions worth a damn.

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          The only guys who you brought up and much of this tread is Ichiro. I bet he does great things for Seattle to help that team win, Giambi does the same with his bat. I'm making a case for my guy, you're making a case for Ichiro. Want me to help?

                          Joe Morgan believes MVP goes to Ichiro, good for him. Though he feels like it's a tight race but he gives his notch to Ichiro thanks to his all-around game.

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          ..and what he had to overcome this season for the sake of the team.

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          What I was talking about.

                          Bonds should thank his team's pitching staff, that's the only thing separating him and Pujols.



                          " I look at him and it's getting to the point where it's just scaring me. He looks younger but he doesn't carry himself in a younger manner. He's impressive, and I'm glad we drafted him. "
                          - Lavar Arrington on his new Redskins teammate Sean Taylor.

                          The World Is At Your Feet.

                          Comment

                          • AI_Franchise03
                            MVP
                            • Dec 2002
                            • 2168

                            #163
                            Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            dce1228 said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            AI_Franchise03 said:

                            You didn't need to make the point for me. I was just waiting for you to comment if you do think it's funny and perhaps why, so that I could respond how you're wrong, but I guess you want me to thank you?

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            Giambi being relegated to the DH slot in favor of the better fielding Nick Johnson makes Giambi as versatile as Jeff Weaver is versatile, pitching middle relief while Jose Contreras goes into the starting rotation. There's a giant difference between that 'versatility' and what Aaron Boone did for the Reds the last year and a half (i.e. playing SS when Larkin was hurt, 2b to start the season to accomodate Brandon Larson, then switching back to 3rd when Larson bit the big one). In other words... IT ISN'T VERSATILITY. End of story. Find a new word to illuminate the underappreciated brilliance of Jason Giambi.

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

                            The last thing, I don't think I made the point I wanted to, concerning Bonds. You sayed you can't give the MVP to a DH,
                            Barry Bonds helps his team more with his bat than his glove. He plays LF regularly, but that doesn't mean he's helping the team very much with his defense.


                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            As Nivek pointed out, and I've spoken of in other posts, Bonds is the definition of MVP because he is irreplaceable in the Giants offense. And he isn't a DH, like Giambi. He plays the field. I believe with all my soul that Ichiro is more important to the M's than Giambi is to the Yankees-- as do most people... 3 out of the 4 ESPN analysists agreed, with Joe Morgan calling them even.

                            You believe Giambi is the most important because you think the Yankees are the most important. You haven't so much as said anything virtuous about Giambi's competition in this thread-- I think that pretty much makes clear that you lack the groundedness to make any opinions worth a damn.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            The only guys who you brought up and much of this tread is Ichiro. I bet he does great things for Seattle to help that team win, Giambi does the same with his bat. I'm making a case for my guy, you're making a case for Ichiro. Want me to help?

                            Joe Morgan believes MVP goes to Ichiro, good for him. Though he feels like it's a tight race but he gives his notch to Ichiro thanks to his all-around game.

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            ..and what he had to overcome this season for the sake of the team.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            What I was talking about.

                            Bonds should thank his team's pitching staff, that's the only thing separating him and Pujols.



                            " I look at him and it's getting to the point where it's just scaring me. He looks younger but he doesn't carry himself in a younger manner. He's impressive, and I'm glad we drafted him. "
                            - Lavar Arrington on his new Redskins teammate Sean Taylor.

                            The World Is At Your Feet.

                            Comment

                            • Nokona
                              Rookie
                              • May 2003
                              • 99

                              #164
                              Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                              I'd walk Barry to make the double play more available. Then I'd bring in a lefty to pitch to Giambi and cross my fingers.

                              Comment

                              • Nokona
                                Rookie
                                • May 2003
                                • 99

                                #165
                                Re: Who should win the AL MVP?

                                I'd walk Barry to make the double play more available. Then I'd bring in a lefty to pitch to Giambi and cross my fingers.

                                Comment

                                Working...