Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Crown42Royal
    Undisputed King Of Sports
    • Apr 2003
    • 775

    #61
    Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    Birdsonbat said:
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    Crown42Royal said:
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    cub said:
    Barrett's got a world of potential.

    He was an all-star with Montreal two years ago, then got injured in the second half. When he recovered from his injury, the Expos made him a platoon player.

    Explain that one.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">I hope this post wasn't directed at me. Cause if it was you need to re-read what I wrote.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    Umm, I think he was just shedding some light on who Michael Barrett is and questioning why the Expos made him a platoon player. That is how I read it anyway.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">If that's what he meant then it's all cool. It's just how I read it.
    Life is a sport, so play hard!

    Comment

    • rsox
      All Star
      • Feb 2003
      • 6309

      #62
      Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      nkhera1 said:
      he is going to be their starting catcher.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      C'mon if healthy Barrett could be a very good Catcher, something this team has not had in a long while(Rick Wilkins), so give him a chance, at the very least if he plays the whole season he should put up better numbers than Damion Miller.

      Comment

      • rsox
        All Star
        • Feb 2003
        • 6309

        #63
        Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        nkhera1 said:
        he is going to be their starting catcher.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        C'mon if healthy Barrett could be a very good Catcher, something this team has not had in a long while(Rick Wilkins), so give him a chance, at the very least if he plays the whole season he should put up better numbers than Damion Miller.

        Comment

        • rsox
          All Star
          • Feb 2003
          • 6309

          #64
          Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          nkhera1 said:
          he is going to be their starting catcher.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          C'mon if healthy Barrett could be a very good Catcher, something this team has not had in a long while(Rick Wilkins), so give him a chance, at the very least if he plays the whole season he should put up better numbers than Damion Miller.

          Comment

          • cub
            MVP
            • Mar 2003
            • 1126

            #65
            Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

            Damian Miller couldn't hit his weight. Defensively, he was OK. He was great at handling the pitching staff, but I don't know if that's enough for a .200 hitting catcher.

            Comment

            • cub
              MVP
              • Mar 2003
              • 1126

              #66
              Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

              Damian Miller couldn't hit his weight. Defensively, he was OK. He was great at handling the pitching staff, but I don't know if that's enough for a .200 hitting catcher.

              Comment

              • cub
                MVP
                • Mar 2003
                • 1126

                #67
                Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                Damian Miller couldn't hit his weight. Defensively, he was OK. He was great at handling the pitching staff, but I don't know if that's enough for a .200 hitting catcher.

                Comment

                • jLp_vAkEr0
                  MVP
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 1506

                  #68
                  Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                  Shouldn't you guys include Todd Walker on that lineup??

                  Comment

                  • jLp_vAkEr0
                    MVP
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 1506

                    #69
                    Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                    Shouldn't you guys include Todd Walker on that lineup??

                    Comment

                    • jLp_vAkEr0
                      MVP
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 1506

                      #70
                      Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                      Shouldn't you guys include Todd Walker on that lineup??

                      Comment

                      • rsox
                        All Star
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 6309

                        #71
                        Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        jLp_vAkEr0 said:
                        Shouldn't you guys include Todd Walker on that lineup??

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        Walker is not going to be a starter for the Cubs, more of a Utility player, but when he does play, if plays 2B he would bat leadoff, if he plays 3B then he'll hit either 6th or 7th.

                        Comment

                        • rsox
                          All Star
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 6309

                          #72
                          Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          jLp_vAkEr0 said:
                          Shouldn't you guys include Todd Walker on that lineup??

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          Walker is not going to be a starter for the Cubs, more of a Utility player, but when he does play, if plays 2B he would bat leadoff, if he plays 3B then he'll hit either 6th or 7th.

                          Comment

                          • rsox
                            All Star
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 6309

                            #73
                            Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            jLp_vAkEr0 said:
                            Shouldn't you guys include Todd Walker on that lineup??

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            Walker is not going to be a starter for the Cubs, more of a Utility player, but when he does play, if plays 2B he would bat leadoff, if he plays 3B then he'll hit either 6th or 7th.

                            Comment

                            • jLp_vAkEr0
                              MVP
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 1506

                              #74
                              Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                              Damn.. that's a PRETTY good "utility" man.

                              Comment

                              • jLp_vAkEr0
                                MVP
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 1506

                                #75
                                Re: Care to take a stab at the Cubs probable batting order?

                                Damn.. that's a PRETTY good "utility" man.

                                Comment

                                Working...