MLB Off-Topic
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
I watched game 7 of the 86 World Series last night. It was 35 years ago and we all know the game has changed but wow it is so much different watching a full game. No graphics on the screen showing the score or inning and there wasn’t really anyone in the crowd wearing fan gear except hats. Leading off the bottom of the second inning Gary Carter, the cleanup hitter drops down a bunt. No overshift, he just tries to drop one down because the 3b was playing back. I know the batters stepping out and pitchers taking forever is currently an issue but I couldn’t believe how fast they were playing. No pitchers constantly shaking off the catcher, it moved at a pace like when I play the show and skip all the cut scenes. It’s a shame than Vin Scully didn’t continue calling the World Series until he retired. That guy is a treasure
Cant believe it took so long before they became the norm.
And I wonder what the backlash might have been like when it first was introduced. Were people complaining that they had some graphic popping up on their screen and blocking the camera shot? Because for years, networks did have scorebugs that would only show up during a break in play or before/after commercials.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Just read on The Athletic's website that former #1 overall pick Mark Appel is attempting a comeback with the Phillies. He's reporting to Phillies minor league campComment
-
Milwaukee Brewers | Green Bay Packers | North Carolina Tar Heels | Wisconsin BadgersComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Despite that, I'm surprised the MLB hasn't implemented a rule where you cant have a top pick in consecutive years or a 3 year span. Since 07, we've had 3 instances of teams getting back to back 1st picks (Astros with three years of a top pick, thankfully only 1 panned out), and in Tigers case, 2 in a 3 year span.
In MLB, no guarantee that guy ends up on your roster, even like in Appels case, he went #1 overall and was considered a top 20-30 prospect in baseball. He was even drafted 8th overall the year prior and didnt sign, so he was a multi time top 10 pick.Last edited by Majingir; 03-28-2021, 09:29 AM.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Baseball is the worst sport for drafts. At least in basketball, hockey and at times football the guy going #1 is a franchise changing player.
Despite that, I'm surprised the MLB hasn't implemented a rule where you cant have a top pick in consecutive years or a 3 year span. Since 07, we've had 3 instances of teams getting back to back 1st picks (Astros with three years of a top pick, thankfully only 1 panned out), and in Tigers case, 2 in a 3 year span.
In MLB, no guarantee that guy ends up on your roster, even like in Appels case, he went #1 overall and was considered a top 20-30 prospect in baseball. He was even drafted 8th overall the year prior and didnt sign, so he was a multi time top 10 pick.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Baseball is the worst sport for drafts. At least in basketball, hockey and at times football the guy going #1 is a franchise changing player.
Despite that, I'm surprised the MLB hasn't implemented a rule where you cant have a top pick in consecutive years or a 3 year span. Since 07, we've had 3 instances of teams getting back to back 1st picks (Astros with three years of a top pick, thankfully only 1 panned out), and in Tigers case, 2 in a 3 year span.
In MLB, no guarantee that guy ends up on your roster, even like in Appels case, he went #1 overall and was considered a top 20-30 prospect in baseball. He was even drafted 8th overall the year prior and didnt sign, so he was a multi time top 10 pick.
MLB is already on the right track by cutting this years draft in half down to 20 rounds but I'm hoping they pare it down even further.
IMO in this case (MLB's draft), less is moreOSFM23 - Building Better Baseball - OSFM23
A Work in ProgressComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
I'd like to see MLB reduce the draft to 10 rounds, force teams to really tighten up the way their draft strategy. then after 300 players are drafted, it's a anything goes free-for-all free agent bonanza
MLB is already on the right track by cutting this years draft in half down to 20 rounds but I'm hoping they pare it down even further.
IMO in this case (MLB's draft), less is more
Especially with the changes in the minor leagues, do they really need so many rounds when many guys taken later don't even sign?Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Not a baseball guy but have a free subscription for a free season of mlb.tv, any Oser feel free to use
Email: [email protected]
Password: Joshua22
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsHorseshoes & HollyWoodComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Deleted.......Originally posted by Gibson88Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
This link contains a list of Opening Day capacity crowds for each team's home ballpark. The fan numbers are essentially estimates for all but Coors Field.
Which MLB teams will have fans in the stands? A ballpark-by-ballpark guide to Opening Day and beyondHere's the latest on each team's COVID-19 return plans as baseball prepares to reopen for fans.
I consolidated the list below, but you might want to read up on some of the information they have on each team's. For example, we know that the Rangers will limit capacity after Opening Day, and in Pittsburgh the 20% also includes employees.
Arizona Diamondbacks: 12,000 (25%)
Atlanta Braves: 13,500 (33%)
Baltimore Orioles: 11,000 (25%)
Boston Red Sox: 4,500 (12%)
Chicago Cubs: 8,300 (20%)
Chicago White Sox: 8,100 (20%)
Cincinnati Reds: 12,700 (30%)
Cleveland Indians: 10,500 (30%)
Colorado Rockies: 21,363 (42.6%)
Detroit Tigers: 8,200 (20%)
Houston Astros: 20,500 (50%)
Kansas City Royals: 10,000 (30%)
Los Angeles Angels: 8,650 (20%)
Los Angeles Dodgers: 11,200 (20%)
Miami Marlins: 9,200 (25%)
Milwaukee Brewers: 10,475 (25%)
Minnesota Twins: 10,000 (25%)
New York Mets: 8,400 (20%)
New York Yankees: 10,850 (20%)
Oakland Athletics: 9,400 (20%)
Philadelphia Phillies: 8,600 (20%)
Pittsburgh Pirates: 7,600 (20%)
San Diego Padres: 8,000 (20%)
San Francisco Giants: 8,250 (20%)
Seattle Mariners: 9,000 (20%)
St. Louis Cardinals: 14,600 (32%)
Tampa Bay Rays: 9,000 (20%)
Texas Rangers: 40,518 (100%)
Toronto Blue Jays: 1,275 (15%)
Washington Nationals: 5,000 (12%)
Anyone know if any teams are still leaving cutouts in between real fans?Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
This is about the same as the Buccos would've brought in this year without COVID
God I hope not. Those things are creepy and actually draw more attention to the weird emptiness than the empty stands themselves would, IMO.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
This link contains a list of Opening Day capacity crowds for each team's home ballpark. The fan numbers are essentially estimates for all but Coors Field.
Which MLB teams will have fans in the stands? A ballpark-by-ballpark guide to Opening Day and beyondHere's the latest on each team's COVID-19 return plans as baseball prepares to reopen for fans.
I consolidated the list below, but you might want to read up on some of the information they have on each team's. For example, we know that the Rangers will limit capacity after Opening Day, and in Pittsburgh the 20% also includes employees.
Arizona Diamondbacks: 12,000 (25%)
Atlanta Braves: 13,500 (33%)
Baltimore Orioles: 11,000 (25%)
Boston Red Sox: 4,500 (12%)
Chicago Cubs: 8,300 (20%)
Chicago White Sox: 8,100 (20%)
Cincinnati Reds: 12,700 (30%)
Cleveland Indians: 10,500 (30%)
Colorado Rockies: 21,363 (42.6%)
Detroit Tigers: 8,200 (20%)
Houston Astros: 20,500 (50%)
Kansas City Royals: 10,000 (30%)
Los Angeles Angels: 8,650 (20%)
Los Angeles Dodgers: 11,200 (20%)
Miami Marlins: 9,200 (25%)
Milwaukee Brewers: 10,475 (25%)
Minnesota Twins: 10,000 (25%)
New York Mets: 8,400 (20%)
New York Yankees: 10,850 (20%)
Oakland Athletics: 9,400 (20%)
Philadelphia Phillies: 8,600 (20%)
Pittsburgh Pirates: 7,600 (20%)
San Diego Padres: 8,000 (20%)
San Francisco Giants: 8,250 (20%)
Seattle Mariners: 9,000 (20%)
St. Louis Cardinals: 14,600 (32%)
Tampa Bay Rays: 9,000 (20%)
Texas Rangers: 40,518 (100%)
Toronto Blue Jays: 1,275 (15%)
Washington Nationals: 5,000 (12%)
Anyone know if any teams are still leaving cutouts in between real fans?
But I'm surprised they have the lowest percentage of all teams. Given they're in Florida, thought they would've had a higher number, like 25% or more.Comment
Comment