NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

[CBAT]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

As a timberwovles fan, if you offered Oladipo, Gordon, Harkless, Harris, and a first for wiggins, martin, and Budinger, I would accept that and laugh at you for years to come.

Lol, thank you.

[Rondodontleave]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

I'm looking for an upgrade defensively or rebounding-wise at the power forward and have a few ideas. http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ppg3d4x With the thunder sending the raptors a first and a second to the celtics, this straight http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=l8pmfl6, this http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ndyjq4x with the celtics giving the clippers first to the nuggets and a second to each of the others, or this http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ora6ezj with the Raptors giving up a first. I'm the raptors btw

[SergentSandwich]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

I'm looking for an upgrade defensively or rebounding-wise at the power forward and have a few ideas. http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ppg3d4x With the thunder sending the raptors a first and a second to the celtics, this straight http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=l8pmfl6, this http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ndyjq4x with the celtics giving the clippers first to the nuggets and a second to each of the others, or this with the Raptors giving up a first. I'm the raptors btw

Ill break this down trade by trade:
Raptors give up: Fields, Hansbrough, Johnson, Patterson, Nogueira
Raptors get: McGee, Faried, 1st
You rob everyone else in this trade. You gave up a back up bigman in Patterson and a prospect in Nogueira for Kenneth Faried and a 1st? No thanks if your going for fairness.


Trade 2:
Raptors give: Vasquez, Patterson
Raptors get: Gibson
While this one was more fair, you don't help the bulls by giving them another pf and the nuggets don't really need Vasquez to back up Lawson.


Trade 3:
Raptors give: Vasquez, Fields, Patterson, 1st
Raptors get: Ibalka, Jerret
Still not fair trade value, I could see Vasquez possibly taking on a 6th man role with a team, Fields is worth nothing, and I don't see Patterson starting for any contending teams. Sorry but you win all these trades but if you really want to do one of them, the second one is your best bet.

[Raider131]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

As a timberwovles fan, if you offered Oladipo, Gordon, Harkless, Harris, and a first for wiggins, martin, and Budinger, I would accept that and laugh at you for years to come.

This in 2K this is a steal
IRL Minnesota laughs and hangs up

[UNDERTAKER1215]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

Would the Nuggets take Avery Bradley and a 2nd for Lawson, or would it have to be a 1st? Or wouldn't they do the deal to begin with?

[redsox4evur]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

Would the Nuggets take Avery Bradley and a 2nd for Lawson, or would it have to be a 1st? Or wouldn't they do the deal to begin with?

It would have to be Bradley, Smart and late first IMO.

[Cf3411]

NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

It would have to be Bradley, Smart and late first IMO.

The Celtics would never trade smart for Lawson. Also the Nuggets want to trade Lawson so his value is down a bit, but multiple people have said that Smart is only untouchable on celtics.

And if they did trade smart it would be smart a filler for Lawson straight up no way would celtics trade 2 guards under 23 and a first for a 27 yr old pg.

Edit: Also look at what Rondo was traded for it would be that type of deal or less. Rondo is a 4 time all star and still just as good if not better than Lawson who has never been to one.

[Rondodontleave]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

Ill break this down trade by trade:
Raptors give up: Fields, Hansbrough, Johnson, Patterson, Nogueira
Raptors get: McGee, Faried, 1st
You rob everyone else in this trade. You gave up a back up bigman in Patterson and a prospect in Nogueira for Kenneth Faried and a 1st? No thanks if your going for fairness.


Trade 2:
Raptors give: Vasquez, Patterson
Raptors get: Gibson
While this one was more fair, you don't help the bulls by giving them another pf and the nuggets don't really need Vasquez to back up Lawson.


Trade 3:
Raptors give: Vasquez, Fields, Patterson, 1st
Raptors get: Ibalka, Jerret
Still not fair trade value, I could see Vasquez possibly taking on a 6th man role with a team, Fields is worth nothing, and I don't see Patterson starting for any contending teams. Sorry but you win all these trades but if you really want to do one of them, the second one is your best bet.

first of all, sorry, I forgot a link, you can check that out. But for the first one, what if I got rid of the first,
would it work? A figured I deserved according to the trade machine saying I would lose 4 extra games, and the thunder are gaining three wins. The pick will be pretty late anyway, since this is starting from the beginning of the season with no injuries. Also, I give up more than just Paterson and noiguera, but also a large expiring in fields, another back up big, and a great wing defender to come off the bench in James Johnson. For the second, I see what you're saying, but with Vasquez, he can guard shooting guards and jameer Nelson and Vasquez can both set each other up for a spot up three. For Paterson, I do see your point, but at least he won't take up as many minutes as Gibson. Also, with Wilson chandler instead of the rookie McDermott and good but not amazing dunleavy. For the last, Vasquez is a solid back up playmaker that compliments waiters better than Jackson. Again, fields is a large expiring contract. However, I think he is going to the wrong team and as such thought about this trade http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=kudwyqs this way fields goes to a rebuilding team in the celtics while chuck Hayes goes to another rebuilding squad. I get a better backup center that can be boneheaded irl and as such the nuggets want him out. They also get a replacement backup center that's young in noiguera. The thunder get two solid power forwards and a first from the raptors for ibaka. If that isn't fair, do you have something else to suggest?

[DoubleZ_3]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

This in 2K this is a steal
IRL Minnesota laughs and hangs up

in 2k this deal is far better for the wolves. Lay of the Crack. A pick and those rookies ? Way better than just wiggans

[DoubleZ_3]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

It would have to be Bradley, Smart and late first IMO.

Just curious...why would you want to do that?

[redsox4evur]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

Just curious...why would you want to do that?

I don't want to do it. It's what I would think Denver wants for Lawson.

[OldHossRadbourn]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

As a timberwovles fan, if you offered Oladipo, Gordon, Harkless, Harris, and a first for wiggins, martin, and Budinger, I would accept that and laugh at you for years to come.

Insane people laugh quite a bit.

[10]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

Lol no they don't. It boils down to this

Oladipo--> all star potential
Gordon--> all star potential
Harris----> Potential to be top 10-15 NBA scorer
Harkless--> potential to be lockdown defender

For

Wiggins--> potential to be superstar
Martin--> overpaid shooter
By dinger-->scrub

That gets accepted all day

Yes, they definitely hang up on this deal. Wiggins untouchable and would not be traded for other guys who have a much lower potential than him.
1. Oladipo is a good player but doesn't have anywhere near the potential Wiggins has.
2. I don't think Gordon will ever be an all star but will end up being a good player.
3. Harris can definitely score on a bad team when he gets his shots but doesn't do anything else really.
4. Harkless is ,kind of a throwaway in this deal as they probably wouldn't resign him. He also hasn't developed at all
I know they are still young but they really haven't developed like most thought they would in Orlando. You also used the best case scenario for all of the Orlando guys but aren't doing the same for Wiggins. Best case scenario for Wiggins is he becomes a top 3 player which they would never trade.

[DoubleZ_3]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

Yes, they definitely hang up on this deal. Wiggins untouchable and would not be traded for other guys who have a much lower potential than him.
1. Oladipo is a good player but doesn't have anywhere near the potential Wiggins has.
2. I don't think Gordon will ever be an all star but will end up being a good player.
3. Harris can definitely score on a bad team when he gets his shots but doesn't do anything else really.
4. Harkless is ,kind of a throwaway in this deal as they probably wouldn't resign him. He also hasn't developed at all
I know they are still young but they really haven't developed like most thought they would in Orlando. You also used the best case scenario for all of the Orlando guys but aren't doing the same for Wiggins. Best case scenario for Wiggins is he becomes a top 3 player which they would never trade.

Nah, wolves accept any day of the week man. No way all those players and 1st rounder (top 3 pick) gets passed up. Not a chance

[10]

Re: NBA 2K15 Trade Discussion Thread

Well, to be a superstar you'd have to be top 5-7 in my book at least so I gave him a lot of credit.

Regardless, my view is this.

If i can have a single superstar with the rest of the team being average/below (real life knicks)

Or have a committee of above average players with no superstar (real life Hawks)

I'll take situation two.

Again you're assuming best case scenario for the Magic and worst case for the Wolves. The Wolves have a few nice pieces in Dieng and Muhammad and maybe LaVine (Rubio, Martin and Pek are debatable in their worth) and will have another top pick this year. If you're saying you would take 1 above average player (Harris), 1 solid player with possible all star potential (Oladipo) and 1 guy with potential (Gordon) over 1 superstar I will have to strongly disagree with you on that. Other than Oladipo you can easily find players that fill the roles of the other guys. You never trade a superstar in the NBA unless its for another superstar and the Wolves aren't getting one back. I won't say anything about comparing the Hawks to the Magic or Melo and the Knicks to Wiggins and the Wolves other than its incredible inaccurate. Like a few guys said, in 2k its definitely a better deal for the Wolves but in real life I don't think its even close.