And you equate demanding/asking for an explanation—which insinuates that the asker thinks the value is wrong, something VT explained he does not want to do—with simply debating?
This is not a thread for "debating/discussing CPU AI GMs," (which is a by-product and not a cause) which you seem to want to swing it to, as was mentioned specifically by Ronyell. Which was before you came back for one more back and forth, which also completely disregards his request not to sully this thread and take the debate to PMs.
As for your graphs, you're comparing NBA (obviously the model) to your default 2k roster MyGM (an attempted emulation with high ratings—and yes, they are high, as are the draft class ratings. LeBron was an 80 overall in his first 2k season. He's the best player in the world. 2k shouldn't have 2-5 guys nearing 80 in their first year with sky-high potentials. High ratings/potential ratings mask the issue, not least because players go into their age-28 season with a much higher overall.) which isn't the regression-affected problem. Your graphs are fine. Your conclusions are based off a different model, which is not where the issue is present. Therefore, please stop or take it to PMs. I'd be happy to go to PMs, but since you don't I might as well post here.

Comment